Donald Trump's 47th U.S. President's two-sex regulation and the halting of USID backing of all measures for genderism both within the United States and throughout the planet became the start of the fight against the 1968 cultural revolution.
This conflict is exacerbated by the negative message of the Head of the Government's Performance Department – Elona Muska – on the USAID, identifying this institution founded in 1961 by John F. Kennedy as a “criminal organization” requiring checking whether its billion-dollar aid to abroad countries is “in line with American interests”. This is the beginning of the American counter-revolution, a surprise for the collective West, which had already turned its face into a dictatorship of the revolutionary ideology of the 21st century globalists controlled by the US. The start of the counter-revolution is all the more amazing that these ideologies were financed by American taxpayers and imposed on the planet as aid from USID funds – the American Agency for global improvement – the world's largest "charitative" institution. The suspension of this aid has hit nearly 130 countries, which means putting a question mark on the further improvement of the cultural revolution in their area. Nothing in Trump's erstwhile word announced his current actions. On the another hand, the applicable slogan of his presidential election run of 2024 was perceived as a tactical component in the acquisition of as many conservative voters as possible.
Meanwhile alea iacta est – all grants awarded by USAID are reviewed, read their exact abstracts and keywords. All sex and related transgenderity and abortion, utmost feminism and ecology are rejected. In the United States alone, school programmes are being reviewed in the same way and education improvement work is being undertaken. Culture and the media besides see a change in the front of the ruthless fight against conservative values on the level of their consideration. Hollywood, whose demoralizing function the Trump administration does not tolerate, will besides gotta number with these values. Its fight against the negative effects of the cultural revolution in all spheres of social life, and so – besides individual – is simply a gigantic undertaking, which the current president may run out of time.
The beginning of the counter-revolution, however, will be hard to stop. It will be hard not to recognise its affirmative impact on Western civilization, on the return to its roots – conservative Christian values. A good sign is the fact that the United States, which promotes the current phase of the cultural revolution itself, has taken up the fight against it. The American conflict has all the attributes of counter-revolution, presented by Plinio Correa de Oliveira in the book Revolution and counter-revolution. It is simply a conflict to return to the sources of Western civilization, identified in the late 20th century with European, Christian/Latin civilization. It is simply a fight against anti-civilization that has become the essence of the cultural revolution.
Anti-civilisation
The past of civilization shows that as a consequence of wars, civilizations seldom change radically. Rather, wars open the way to the impact of stronger – at the axiological level – on the weaker one, which results in – according to Felix Koneczne – the formation of poisoned civilization mixtures. extremist changes in civilization appear as a consequence of revolutions, not all of which are directed at them. The concept of revolution, both in collegiate and technological terms – above all historical and sociological – is simply a ambiguous concept, having various connotations. In both shots, it means any fundamental transformation not only of social and political, but besides of civilization. The essence of the revolution was correct Alexis de Tocqueville Work Former Governments and the Revolution, paying attention to social awareness as the starting point of major coups. While treating the French Revolution as an archetype of specified modern upheavals, Tocqueville pointed out that they were always born out of the rebellion of any part of society, born of the belief that it would bring about social, political, cultural changes that it expected.
This approach is very crucial due to the fact that it displays its intellectual background, emphasizes the fact that the revolution is always born in the minds and designs a fresh order, presented not only as better, but above all as ideal. As the French revolution argues, and above all the Bolshevik, the underlying fresh social-political model could not be realized in the post-Revolutionary era, as it had the character of utopia. The Bolshevik Revolution resulted in a hecatomb of human beings and the largest in Russia's past of social-political failure, but besides cultural-civilization. However, it did not halt the opinion-making elites – this time Western – from temptation not only of another utopia, but besides radically different – purely anthropological. It proclaims the thought of a fresh man, devoid of identity not only personal, cultural, spiritual and national, but besides gender. The thought of a man more degraded than the infamous homo sovieticus, due to the fact that enslaved by the ideology of genderism, which transforms him into a cripple, a being incapable to pass on life.
Anthropological utopia
Such anthropological utopia became the foundation of the cultural revolution, initiated by philosophers of the neo-Marxist Frankfurt School during its American period, i.e. from 1939 to 1949. It was a period erstwhile her most crucial philosophers – among others. Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse – in escaping the powerful wave of anti-Semitism the 3rd Reich found shelter in the US and employment at American universities from Columbia University headed. any of them – Adorno and Max Horkheimer – engaged in Hollywood in group activities Aldous Huxley, Christopher Isherwood, Igor Stravinsky and Alexander Korda (Member of the Bolshevik government of Bela Kuna in Hungary, associate György Lukács) in promoting mass culture as an instrument of the cultural revolution and accompanying its "cultural pessimism". It is worth remembering erstwhile we have been following Hollywood's function in promoting sex ideology over the past decades and considering the blind imitation of this movie archetype in the West.
The philosophers of the Frankfurt School besides exerted a powerful influence on the improvement of American education, beginning it to Marxist-Freud ideas and intellectual experiments in head control. Their goal – both in culture and education and discipline – was to deconstruct the American mentality firmly embedded on the values of religion – various Christian confessions – the cult of a conventional family, a bourgeois-capitalist social system. The fresh phase of the cultural revolution in the form of the free and sexual revolution of the 1950s and 1960s was a continuation of the Western civilizational degeneration process, launched in the 1930s in the US. This phase reached the apogee in 1968, covering not only the United States, but besides Mexico, Japan and Western Europe.
As a freedom revolution, it besides included 2 states of the russian bloc – Poland and Czechoslovakia. In the case of Warsaw and Prague, it was a quasi-freedom revolution, as it was organized by revisionist environments, curious only in an effort to give communism a "human face", not to reject it. It is worth remembering, due to the fact that in the circles referring to the 1968 tradition – to Polish March and the Prague Spring – the free and anti-communist myths of these events are maintained. The main motto of the 1968 Revolution: “More Freedom!” sounded differently in the West, differently in the block of communist states. While students of Polish universities utilized by Marxist revisionists demanded respect for the most fundamental human rights – freedom of speech and convictions, they did not, however, encourage anti-communist slogans. In America and Europe, however, freedom has triumphed. From all authority and values that form it, from tradition and the model of life to date.
Its full character has made it into an ideology that has penetrated not only discipline and the most spectacular form of social life – politics – but besides all forms of culture and its means of transmission – from conventional to state-of-the-art. From literature, theatre, music and ballet, art, theatre and movie to state-of-the-art forms of electronic transmission, including the usage of the AI – Artificial Intelligence, an algorithm capable of self-correction and self-education, called artificial intelligence. sex ideology is not only anti-metaphysical and anti-religious, but besides anti-humanist, due to the fact that it creates a man who is flawed, incapable to specify himself. No war has hit so hard the foundations of Western civilization, built on the doctrine of the antiquity and medieval, Roman law and Christian values.
The cultural revolution in the sex phase has negated the foundation of our civilization, which is brilliantly included in the medieval expression of transcendentals of “axiological” – pictures referring to all being, inalienable, mutually complementary. These are: fact (verum) symbolizing cognitive values, good (bonum) – symbolizing moral norms and beauty (pulchrum) representing the aesthetic dimension of our existence. At this phase of the revolution, not only the unity of these constant data relating to human existence has been negated, but besides their metaphysical character, not subject to man's will. It was replaced by substitutes, delusions, mediocre ideas of the divinity of a self-created man – e.g. through sex change. These notions of sex utopia do not ingrain human beings in man himself, nor in any human community, nor, all the more so, in the divine origin of existence. They throw it – like the twentieth-century doctrine of existentialism – into the void of quasi-metaphysical.
The manifestations of Western/Christian civilization, carefully protected by conservative environments, inactive exist. However, they do not decide on the Western civilization face, on its standards of social life, politics and culture. They be on the basis of coexistence with opposing phenomena and processes which are the consequence of the cultural revolution. This is visible both in the private sphere – by choosing any form of LGBTQ+ – as well as social – at the level of the institution of matrimony and family. The conventional forms of the second were compared to sex “marriage” and “family” – acting as civilization bulldozers. Their essence and intent is the anti-civilization of the contemporary man in the void not only metaphysical and religious, but besides social and cultural. The exit from this anti-civilization forum can now take place through an American counter-revolution that gives the United States a chance to win the name of Western moral leadership as the vice president of this country says James David Vance. And this is what leadership could make real 2 projects of not only geopolitical importance promoted by Musk, but besides civilizational significance: MAGA – Make America large Again – and MEGA – Make Europe large Again. Unfortunately, neither America nor Europe are ready for a civilizational fight for their greatness.
Anti-American opposition
The opposition to the started counter-revolution is expressed not only by the American left-liberal elites and their media, but besides by Europeans. The opposition is bold and loud, as it is based in a grid of ties to the secret services of the American "deep state" – the deep state – to which Trump besides declared war. The uncertainty of conservative environments in both hemispheres is tremendous and growing. The American counter-revolution is accompanied by the "kowboy" actions of its initiator in the field of geopolitics. Their example is the controversial plans of the current U.S. president towards Panama, Greenland, Gaza Strip, Ukraine.
There is concern that the implementation of the second will undermine the importance of the counter-revolution or even hinder it. At this phase of action, the American and European Conservative communities must have adequate hope to win. It has no guarantees. And until they are there, a toxic mix of tradition and cultural revolution will keep the West in chains of civilization chaos. There is besides fear that this chaos will be controlled – possibly defeated by them deep state – and will proceed without time. Controlled chaos can besides lull the vigilance of defenders of tradition and Western/Christian civilization. This vigilance is now our task, from which the West – besides Catholic Poland – easy gave up at the time erstwhile Christianity was annihilated in the American wars in the mediate East, erstwhile the Treaty of Lisbon took them to the margins of Europe, putting above its values the usurped rights of all minorities.
Do the US copy Russia?
Trump's American counter-revolution is hard to compare to that counter-revolution that took place in Russia after the dissolution of the russian Union and saw full triumph at all crucial levels of social, political, cultural Federation of Russia. It is simply a worldwide event about which the West participating in the American anti-Russia task is persistently silent. The conservative Poland, most closely active in this project, is besides persistently silent. Before Donald Trump He began to aspire to Western moral leader, Vladimir Putin became a civilizational catechone. In addition, the Russian evenement is that neither Mikhail Gorbachev of the Periestroika company nor Boris Yeltsyn legalizing the dissolution of the russian Union were conservatives with conservative political background. The Russian counter-revolution was of a bottom-up and mostly organic nature in Koneczne terms, which, however, did not foresee specified an chance for Russia. Counter-revolutionary Russia had a tradition of spirituality and metaphysical culture, reigning for the Bolshevik Revolution. She had their archetypes reinforced by archetypes of spiritual philosophy: Fyodor Dostoevsky, Lion Tolstoy, Vladimir Solovyov, Nicholas Bierdiaev.
America does not have specified a cultural foundation, there are no archetypes indicating the metaphysical direction, heroism of humility, the intent of monastic spirituality. Her Christianity of many confessions was dominated by the antimetaphysical, "pragmatic" morality of Protestantism. All the more reason why the American counter-revolution started requires the American people themselves to be determined, patient and independent of the geopolitical goals of each White home administration.
Prof. Anna Raźny
photo of wikipedia
Think Poland, No. 9-10 (2-9.03.2025)
