In the first episode of this communicative (Szczęsniak: The biggest plunder in the past of | Think Poland) I told you how the West utilized the global financial strategy to make the biggest looting in history. Today, I would like to tell you how Europe has been put into this nasty mess.
As the war in Ukraine began to extend, and the Russian economy did not collapse under the burden of the trade war, the White home increased the force to confiscate frozen enemy state assets. Russia's money was expected to finance the war with Russia, simultaneously enriching the Western industrial and arms complex.
Greatly conceived mechanism, but European countries have resisted these pressures for a long time. At the G-7 meetings, Washington kept raising the subject, forcing concessions. Brussels and Kiev worked with him, but the aggressive slogans of politicians were weakened by warnings from the financial world. The European Central Bank or Euroclear, a key safety institution for European and global financial transactions, warned that this would be a powerful blow to the euro. After specified plunder, the largest in history, investors would lose assurance in the currency in which the accumulated wealth irresponsible politicians could simply confiscate.
It is up to European countries to take the hazard that this war cannot be won. The Americans, who, against their smaller enemies (Afghanistan, Iran, Venezuela, etc.) are rather keen on their wealth, are cautious this time. For months, they urged Europe to enter this trap by refraining from taking steps that could incriminate them, or undermine the hegemony of the dollar. They know that the confiscation will come back boomerang, let Europe melt its currency. They shifted to a “younger partner” the full burden of the war in Ukraine, selling NATO arms to Kiev, who issues further bills for the war with Russia. And then we'll gotta return the money. Or... go to war alone. For having spent so much money it is hard to admit defeat, let alone return it. Europe is stepping into this war step-by-step.
Therefore, only after 2 years a rotten compromise was achieved – a defective version of the confiscation. The reason was obvious: the Union committed itself to financing this war, the yearly supply of EUR tens of billion to Ukraine. Notwithstanding the final step, the confiscation of state assets was agreed to something indirect. Blocked money brings income (Euroclear invests cash in the European Central Bank), so in Brussels it was considered that these profits could be taken distant due to the fact that they are not "state resources and are not available to the Bank of Russia". Having imprisoned these funds at her home, she imposed a taxation on the income from them. And he's utilizing it for the Ukrainian War. Clever, huh?
Although the legal justification for the taxation is necky. Imagine that the state forbids us to choose our money from a bank deposit and imposes a taxation on profits. He's breaking the deal that we put these funds into, utilizing coercion to do it. Clean robbery, right? A alleged "unrejectible proposal," as the gangsters utilized to say, holding a weapon to the victim's head. But Brussels felt that this was not a violation of the law and had the right to take these measures.
But what a lousy penny! What, like a lousy $1.5 billion twice a year? What this is about over a 100 billion allocated to this war by the United States and Europe from the beginning! Nothing! So the force to confiscate is increasing, the force is increasing. They call for the exhibition of large think-tanks from overseas and their local expositions, geared towards the screening of American soft power in Europe. This is made public by the media, where all the experts (those from climate as well) feverishly convince that Ukraine's money belongs. Brussels faces the neck-to-head task of pouring billions more into the accounts of American arms companies or Kiev administration. And there's no money in the register. So all we gotta do is break the opposition of a fewer politicians and... they will.
Andrzej Szczęsniak
Think Poland, No. 45-46 (9-16.11.2025)
