Constant profit trap

niepoprawni.pl 3 weeks ago

As you most likely know, the sense of the existence of the strategy in which we live ("subscriptionism") is simply a continuous gain.

Not enough. It's a continuous gain, but it should be fast and substantial.

I will not explain this in depth, if individual wants to research it, I mention to R. Ziemkiewicz's films.

In short, companies are governed by managers who pay dividends depending on how they increase the value of the company over the last fewer years they manage it.

Then the planet may even collapse, but the manager already has it in ðupa, due to the fact that he is already on a private island, and it does not concern him.

There are many problems in the world, but there is simply a way to solve them (almost) all.

I mean, travel into space.

Overcrowding? You can settle another planets into infinity. In the solar strategy alone there are dozens of celestial bodies capable of holding billions.

Are the natural materials moving out? They can always be mined on another planets.

These planets don't even request to be terraformed (and most likely shouldn't even be). There are adequate greenhouses for plant and animal husbandry, and systems for resupply of CO2 oxygen (what can be done).

So you might ask, why isn't anyone going in that direction? It would be countless profits for all mankind.

The answer is precisely the subject of this entry.

Space settlement would be very beneficial in all respect, but long-term (after several, possibly respective decades).

In the short term, it's all losses - you gotta spend money on rockets, fuel, suits, investigation on fresh technologies etc.

That's why no 1 (except extravagants like Elon) does. due to the fact that before these profits materialize, the manager would be out of tenure, and he wouldn't get a penny of a dividend.

Let's turn the wheel now.

The improvement of artificial intelligence brings immense profits (for a corporation, not for people), but in the short term.

For now, the morons are happy to have ChatLGBT compose their homework, and the morons in command are happy that the robot will replace them with a man.

But scientists inform that if you don't do something about it, by 2030 it could be over, and AI can either kill humanity or enslave it.

But that's after the end of the incumbent managers, so what do they care?

Similarly with elgiebetism. Short word can be earned from clinics of evil, or the sale of inclusive gadgets, but long-term deficiency of people to work, due to the fact that this ideology reduces natural growth.

And so is migration.

In conclusion, the current strategy aims to increase short-term profits, even if it deviates from it and long-term profits do not interest it.

The reason for this is the management option.

What do I do about it?

I am not an economist, so delight do not treat my words as any revealed truth.

By good reason, we'd gotta destruct the stock system. Without buying the excise, there will be no managers.

Through the introduction of the stock system, all corp was governed by an autocrat dictator who aimed at the long-term welfare of his company (and frequently besides average people), and this strategy worked.

We just gotta get back to him.

Only I'm not the 1 with the power, they are. And they like the system, so they won't let it move.

Read Entire Article