In government spheres, intensive work is underway on the bill, which is already called "silent amnesty" for maintenance debtors. The proposal to respond to the dramatically low recovery of alimony and the expanding debt of the Alimentative Fund raises utmost opinions. On the 1 hand, there is simply a hope that even any of the money will be recovered and thousands of debtors will be professionally activated. On the another hand, single parents and relief organizations beat the alarm, talking about feeling harm and rewarding responsibility. According to the preliminary assumptions that our analysts have reached, the task is expected to enter into force in early 2025 and can completely change the scene of fighting over the money due to children. The problem is gigantic – debt to the Alimentative Fund has already exceeded PLN 15 billion, and the effectiveness of the bailout executions is inactive highly low. is simply a controversial bill the only way out of this stalemate?
Kulisy of the proposal – what does the fresh bill establish?
The task that the household department and social policy are working on is based on a conditional debt waiver mechanism. This is simply a revolutionary approach that departs from the so-far inefficient policy of penalties and sanctions. The main assumptions to be presented in 2025 are as follows:
- Conditional debt relief: The debtor, who will regularly and full repay the current alimony for 12 consecutive months, will be able to apply for a waiver up to 50% of its debt To the Alimentative Fund.
- Professional activation programme: The usage of ‘amnesty’ is to be linked to the mandatory participation in activation programmes. The government wants to pull the debtors out of the grey area and encourage them to take legal work, which is theoretically intended to guarantee a steady supply of funds to support their children.
- Simplified procedures: The application process is to be full deformed to encourage as many people as possible to benefit from the programme. The goal is to rapidly and massively recover money that has been virtually irrecoverable so far.
The government argues that the current strategy is inefficient. Debt Spiral makes many debtors never be able to repay their liabilities, prompting them to hide their income and work black. The fresh bill is about to break this vicious circle.
Two sides of the medal: Hope for debtors or a blow to single parents?
The proposed changes have sparked a stormy debate. Supporters of the bill emphasize its pragmatic dimension. They claim that it is better to recover any of the money than to stay with a zero impact on the child's account and increasing state debt. They indicate that the professional activation of debtors is simply a benefit for the full economy. They argue that the current restrictive rules are frequently counterproductive and alternatively of mobilizing to pay, they force debtors into even greater financial and life problems.
Adversaries, including many single parents associations, do not leave a dry thread on the project. In their view, it is simply a clear approval to avoid responsibility. They argue moral risk – debtors will receive a signal that not paying alimony for years can simply pay them. The single mothers who have fought for all gold for years feel cheated and hurt. "It's like you say: don't pay, wait, and we'll yet let you go," comments 1 of the mothers on the net forum. It is besides worrying that the waiver concerns debt to the State alternatively than straight to the child.
Alimony fund on the verge of productivity. Is that the only way?
There is no denying that the government's motivation is the disastrous financial situation of the Alimentative Fund. In 2025, the debt of debtors to the Treasury for the benefits paid from the fund is expected to scope record PLN 16 billion. The state adds billions to the strategy each year and recovers only a twelve percent of this amount. The strategy is on the verge of collapse and the cost of maintaining it is borne by all taxpayers.
Economic analysts indicate that from a purely financial point of view, specified a solution may make sense. The release of part of frozen funds and the inclusion of thousands of people in the legal economy could bring tangible benefits. However, social policy experts inform against the long-term consequences of this step. This can weaken the general paying morality and make a dangerous precedent that will be hard to reverse in the future.
What's next? Divided experts, uncertain future
The bill is presently in the interministerial consultation phase and is about to enter public consultation. The government is announcing a broad debate, but the determination to make changes seems large. It will be crucial to find a golden means that, on the 1 hand, will increase the recovery of alimony and, on the another hand, will not undermine the fundamental sense of social justice. The next months will show whether the "silent amnesty" will become a fact. 1 thing is certain: the destiny of hundreds of thousands of children and their parents depends on decisions that will be made at the heights of power in 2025. There is simply a immense stake and the result of this legislative conflict remains uncertain.
Continued here:
They're gonna quit the debts to the Allymen? Controversial government plan creates utmost emotions
