Poland has found itself an highly dangerous situation. Ukraine, losing the war with Russia, must besides fight interior theft. Many centres in Europe and outside Europe depend on this war to become international. Many insist that Poland and another countries of the "east flank of NATO" should be involved. In order to internationalize the conflict, it is essential to provoke Poland to stand militaryly on the side of Ukraine. The diversion on the tracks is another, after the rocket in the wire and action with drones, which truly brings our country closer to war.
Each reasonably reasonable individual in specified a situation expects a balanced position of the authorities after the investigation is concluded. The rush is erstwhile you catch fleas, not play chess with atomic powers. In this case, mass-media and many politicians of both the Civic Coalition and the opposition did not keep appropriate abstinence. The surrounding of Prime Minister Donald Tusk had no uncertainty from the outset who made the act of diversion. associate of the civilian Coalition Marek Biernacki stated: “The Russians are behind it, and this is simply a clear matter.”
Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated after a twelve hours in his parliamentary speech that "the established persons are 2 Ukrainian citizens, active and cooperating for a long time in Russian services". He besides said that allied services helped identify the perpetrators. According to the Polish Prime Minister, the bomber was to be a Ukrainian convicted earlier in Ukraine for acts of diversion. It doesn't stick. So how did the Ukrainians get out of prison during the diversion war, and how did it get into our country? This is not the first time the Ukrainians have made acts of diversion in Poland. Practically always used, they add information that "Ukrainians acted on behalf of peculiar services of Russia".
In my opinion, Prime Minister's words are premature and not cautious. Accusing an atomic power of a terrorist act is what we can call a quasi-war state. This may have very serious consequences in the close future. Especially erstwhile it was not possible to analyse all the threads in specified a short time. Unfortunately, in my opinion, the words of Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk will dangerously bring us closer to war.
Hitting Belarus and indirectly US politics? The Prime Minister said that Ukrainians on Russian services after performing a diversion act in Mika left Poland through the border crossing in Terespol. This was just after the assassination. This information is utilized by the parties to the dispute between Poland and Belarus. It is worth noting that this happened just after the border crossings Bobrownik-Bierestowice and Kuźnica Białostock-Bruzgi were reopened. This besides complicates the long-standing and affirmative discussions between the US and Belarus.
The paradox is that NATO, which has limited our sovereignty, may be saving us present from an open war on the side of Ukraine. However, the North Atlantic Pact is mostly controlled by US president Donald Trump. With large probability it is the Americans who prevent war hawks in Europe – including Poland – from entering a full-scale war with the Russian Federation. This war is in the interests of the large 3 (Germany-UK-France) and the Ukrainian authorities. But it is simply a deadly trap for countries specified as Poland, Slovakia, Romania and Hungary.
In this respect, it is worth remembering the words of erstwhile Polish president Andrzej Duda, who stated: “They (Ukrainians – ed.) have been trying to draw everyone into war from the beginning. It's obvious, it's in their interest, and it's best if we can get the NATO countries into war. It is clear that they are seeking those who would fight actively against the Russians on their side. This has been happening since the first day.” I'm certain the president was telling the truth.
It could be concluded that is fecit, cui prodest – this has done whose benefit? Let's not be in the hot water of the company. Although the benefits of including NATO states, for example, Poland, Romania and the Baltic States in the war with Russia would be beneficial to Ukraine, it does not mean that Ukraine is behind it. That would be as premature as Mr. Mark Biernacki's opinion. We too, who approach very cautiously and even reluctantly to the policy pursued by Ukraine, must keep a cool head and calculate. I think we should reconsider our position a fewer times before we make it public. Let us remember that on this board plays not two, but at least a fewer dry players.
Information is besides a weapon. It is utilized by all parties to the conflict and the supporters of these parties. It is crucial to know that we are all willing-not wanting participants in the information and disfigurement war. Poland as a country of the Atlantic planet and at the same time a country bordering the war region is peculiarly delicate to everyone. It's not worth idealizing either side. Let us remember hard about the endecimal rule – first the Polish people and Poland.
We know that thanks to the submissions of the ruling Ukrainian side in Poland, the Ukrainian side recognizes our country as its natural resources. In this case, it is not Ukraine's fault, but the authorities in Poland. After all, it was Law and Justice, and later the Civic Coalition with appetizers served as a servant of the Ukrainian people. Kiev benefited from the submission and reluctance of the authorities in Poland towards Russia.
Let us avoid the function of a carp demanding an accelerated Christmas Eve. Let's do everything we can to avoid war and not push our countrymen into a abroad front. Forget the prometean bullshit, the Christs of the nations, the fighting for yours and ours. We request national selfishness. We cannot afford to lose hundreds of thousands of young Poles. Let us defend our national community. Let's defend our biological survival. Let's stay at peace due to the fact that he's the only 1 who guarantees the safety of us and our loved ones today. The Russian-Ukrainian War is not our war.
Adam Lubski
