I am highly critical of prof. Andrzej Nowak. And his multi-volume work, which is based on ideas, spirit and political actions, and mostly omitting economics and behind the scenes, alien influences which destroyed not only the Republic of Both Nations but besides a number of another states. Recollecting, for example, the Hungarians of the Jagillons, Tsaric Russia, the Austro-Hungarian Empire or the erstwhile Yugoslavia.
Therefore, his imagination of the resurrection of I Rzplitej and the fact that it supposedly ends present on Mariupol does not talk to me at all. And the Republic is gone and never again in (or at least in the immediate, nevertheless predictable) future. Equally sick and unrealistic is the imagination of the alleged Intermortal or Trimortal that can arise, be (and survive) only in conditions where it will be constantly and continuously supported by the United States. With any withdrawal of the protector there will be no stone left of it, due to the fact that it would be a problem for both Russia and Germany. And it would be easy to do so, with the scale of conflict between the interests of the states that would enter in the Intermortal (and the Trimorum).
The demolition of Russia is an unwise suggestion. We will stimulate even more opposition from the Russians...
But they happen to the prof. rare, due to the fact that uncommon flashes of common sense. In spite of numerous, unusual visions on the radio show, Wnet indicated that “the demolition of Russia is an unwise suggestion. We will stimulate even greater opposition of the Russians.” Who wants to hear the full conversation:
Especially worth paying attention to what he has said since 15 minutes 40 seconds. Of course, the aborted visions of Russia breaking up into a number of different state organisms – the weak and controlled by the West is not a fresh idea. On the contrary. Currently, this thought for Russia is promoted by British and American centres and, of course, Ukrainian (and besides secondary Polish). It is specifically about Alexander Motyl's suggestions of an American political scientist of Ukrainian origin from the American Rutgers University that the best and, in fact, the only way for Russia is to break it into districts is the aborted idea. And completely unreal.
The West alternately built and destroyed Russia
I don't compose that Russia is our friend and that we request strong Russia for anything. Personally, I think it's the opposite. But weak, broken Russia is for many reasons the same threat to us. Remember, it was thanks to the West that Russia won with Rzplita
(from 1 point, due to the fact that she had previously fought Lithuania supported by Poland) a 2 hundred-year conflict for primacy in Central and east Europe. It was besides thanks to the West that it came to its top power – after defeating Napoleon and after the legislature of Vienna, in the 1920s and 1930s erstwhile it threatened the planet leadership of Britain. And to later lose the industrial and technological race. With the sensitivity of the Russian state to the actions of abroad agents then began with the November uprising (although abroad inspiration especially British is simply a lot in the emergence of Decabrists), a burrowing chance to weaken Prussia and the displacement of Englishmen from Central Asia and India, and ended with the defeat of the Crimean war definitely cutting off the Tsars from the chances of winning Turkish straits and going to the Mediterranean. The power of russian Russia is besides due to the West – American banks and manufacture in the 1920s and Anglo-American aid during planet War II. He wasn't alone in Yalta either. There were 2 more leaders of Anglo-Saxon powers.
Russia is simply a different civilization.
Today, the same collective West (and specifically Anglo-Saxons, due to the fact that Germany, French and Italians have a different opinion) hopes to lead Russia to the same state as in 1856, 1905, 1917, or 1991. However, Russia is simply a different civilization than the West. And so Felix Koneczny wrote about a circumstantial mix of turanism and Byzantinism. In addition, I fishy that, after all these historical lessons, Russia has drawn appropriate conclusions from history. And that may mean that in case individual extends his hand to the Kings, the Kuryl Islands, or even the Crimea will end up utilizing atomic weapons. specified a solution is established by Russian atomic doctrine, and many Russian commanders and politicians are aware that the failure to usage this weapon in the situation of the entry of abroad powers into the Russian Federation is simply a manifestation of utmost weakness. This is strengthening the centrifugal forces that are blowing up the Russian Federation and speeding up the state's decay and decay process. And 1 thing the Russians never forgive their power—weakness. And Russia has fallen can be as dangerous to us as Imperial Russia. And remember, although Russia is besides weak to win a conventional war against the West, it has a powerful atomic bogeyman. Which in case of failure must usage if he wants to last his statehood!
Zdzisław Markowski
