Warufakis: The centrists blindly believe in 3 myths. For his (and our) destruction

krytykapolityczna.pl 1 year ago

Self-confidence in the elite shows the stableness of the system. And today, the elite on both sides of the Atlantic clearly deficiency confidence. Last year inactive They wipe their eyes with amazement How things are going.

In the United States, centrists are outraged that ungrateful masses do not appreciate president Biden's economical success – adequate to draw them to Donald Trump. In Europe, akin doubts consequence in the grand victories of various varieties of Trumpism over liberalism icons specified as French president Emmanuel Macron or German Greens.

Everywhere in the West, the fact that draconian sanctions did not even break out in the Russian economy, and Chinese technology companies stick despite economical restrictions, triggers a combination of nihilism and chauvinism. 3 myths stand behind the collective frustration of Western centrists who erstwhile took their hegemony for granted.

The first story is that by definition the top enemy of the far right is the political center. The second is that there is simply a typical social actor, any imaginary “average voter” who decides on the result of the election. Third, that sanctions and duties will halt China and Russia, as these countries depend on western technology, capital and payment systems.

The overthrow of these myths is simply a essential step, even if the present is insufficient.

I'm going to start with the story of the titanic clash between the center and the utmost right, and I'm going to ask: would Macron's uplift out of nowhere and his election as president of France have occurred if it weren't for the challenge of Marine Le Pen and its grouping, then under the name of the National Front? surely not. And would individual like Le Pen grow stronger if individual like Macron didn't run politics in favour of the richest, cutting taxes, and at the same time forcing at least half the society to tighten its belt? Here, too, I say no.

Although Macron and Le Pen no uncertainty hatred each another (like Democrats with Trump in the US), their power is symbiotic. The policy of state socialism led by centrists for fewer and savings for many feeds the neofascist right - whose triumphs in turn confirm the centrists' belief that they are the last line of defence against neofascism.

Let us now look at the story of the average, ungrateful electorate, carelessly ignoring the robust revival of Western economies after the pandemic. The only people who surprise the collapse of support for Macron or who blame the American masses for underestimating the Bidenian gift of a thriving economy live in a planet of spreadsheets with statistic per capita and another macroeconomic data. They think the fractional GDP growth here and the percent point of the fall in unemployment there makes a real difference to people.

In 1992, Bill Clinton's run mantra was “The Economy, you fool!” They're being repeated to this day. But now the question is: whose economy? erstwhile you ask the worse people why they walk so angry erstwhile GDP is rising, they say, “Maybe you are increasing due to the fact that I am not.” erstwhile you tell them that inflation is exhaling, they repost: “Perhaps prices do not emergence for you, for me they are sky high!” To put it plainly, it is rather logical that in our planet after the crisis of 2008, despite the illuminated macroeconomic statistics, the life prospects of most people are increasingly bleak.

Having overestimated their own hegemony in their societies, the western elite of centrists then overestimated power over external competitors, in peculiar China and Russia. In both cases, the effect of exercising that large power proved to be contrary to purpose.

In the case of Russia, unprecedented Western sanctions for her aggression against Ukraine even fell from the sky to president Vladimir Putin. His top weakness was the limited control over the oligarchs who secured themselves by holding most of their spoils in the West. However, sanctions gave Putin the chance to force them to choose between Russia and the West. The leader sweetened his ultimatum with the possible of taking over profitable businesses (such as McDonald’s or IKEA), abandoned by Western corporations.

Furthermore, the cut-off of Russia's war economy from western supply chains caused a immense decision towards reindustrialisation. This effort overcompensated the serious failure of imported intermediate goods and related price increases.

China's resilience further disappointed Washington's decision-makers who believed that the CHIPS and discipline Act Bidena, a bill prohibiting all (not only Americans) sales of advanced semiconductors to Chinese companies, would powerfully weaken Chinese advanced technology companies and aid States win the Second Cold War. Meanwhile, Huawei has developed better software that squeezes more computing power from smaller microchips and gives Chinese semiconductor manufacturers time to catch up with the West in the improvement of equipment. The American and European authorities have amazed the flood of comparatively inexpensive and technically superior electrical vehicles and equipment powered by green energy.

Perhaps the strongest impact on the assurance of the Western elite came after sanctions were imposed. They failed to convince their societies that there was to be reshoring, that industrial production would return to western countries. Only then did these elites yet realize that 30 years of neglecting and eliminating investments in both manufacturing and in the ability of the state to solve problems led the West to infirmities.

Wherever we look – whether it's the US, the United Kingdom or the European Union – we find countries with no erstwhile competence to build something themselves: from the British railways and the American atomic submarine program to green energy, public wellness and many another areas.

The contrast to the achievements of Russia and China weighs on Western decision-makers. After all, for decades they have allowed corporate lobbyists and allied think tanks to weaken the state's ability to do what needs to be done. We will see whether the bitter awakening will persuade them to reject the 3 myths they have long blindly believed.

**
Copyright: task Syndicate, 2024. www.project-syncicate.org. In English she translated Aleksandra Paszkowska.

Read Entire Article