Attack on Donald Trump It's an unquestionably disgraceful Secret Service (USSS). He besides placed a shadow on the professional image of the current manager of services, Kimberly Cheatle, the second female in that position since the establishment of the body in 1865.
Similar attacks on American politicians, including presidents and erstwhile presidents, have occurred respective times. The most loud defeat of American services so far was death John F. Kennedy 1963. James Joseph Rowley then served as director. Then the bomber besides fired a firearm from the roof of a tall building. Since then, checking specified buildings close the current or erstwhile president's residence is, at least according to the authoritative protocol, the Secret Service's priority.
Neither Rowley nor Kennedy’s task of protecting agents—although, for apparent reasons, being blamed for the President’s death—had to explain their gender. Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, and William McKinley died before the Secret Service came to the service to defend the most crucial politicians in the state (1902), but already in Ronald Reagan's case, agents – yes, male – failed. Reagan survived more through the bomber's mistake than through USSS effectiveness.
It is good that, despite the accident, men do not gotta face charges that their temporary failure is due to gender. Even professionals in utmost conditions make mistakes. In general terms, Secret Service is hard to deny effectiveness and has a advanced estim in the United States for good reason. Yet, the right and the different ointments of misogynists, non-constructive attacks on the agency come easy – provided there is an chance to hit women and equality policy.
USSS officer. photograph by Wikimedia CommonsThis is not just about women. Just callback the March of that year erstwhile the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsed in Baltimore, killing six men doing maintenance work on it. All victims were immigrants taking on a occupation that white U.S. citizens do not want. The right-wing storyteller happily linked the disaster with open borders, and the victims themselves – with incompetence and laziness, as with the Trump attack, blaming the DEI (Diversity, Equity and inclusion), that is, policies aimed at promoting fair treatment and full participation of all people, in peculiar groups that have been discriminated against and underrepresented in the past.
There's footage of 3 USSS agents on the network. Lower than his colleagues, with sunglasses, hair tied in a ponytail. On 1 of the most widely shared films, they stand around the car, nervously looking at the sides. This is to be 1 of the evidence that women are not fit to execute this kind of function. Matt Walsh, right-wing activist with nearly 3 million followers, wrote on X: “No women should be in the Secret Service. These are to be the best of the best, and no of the best of the best in this occupation is simply a woman." “They have released them from the kitchen and are already lost”, “But these idiots choose men’s competitions only to appreciate themselves”, “Strengthary ministries and women are the fall of civilization”, “Women are the birthing of children, the remainder is simply a farce” – I read in comments.
Listen to the podcast “Women's Education”:
Similar statements are not directed towards men who failed to defend Trump – who survived due to the fact that the bomber, Thomas Matthew Crooks, simply missed. Yes, they are besides criticized, but no 1 connects their mistakes with their gender. By the way, if it were an assassin, her failure to usage weapons would be widely ridiculed.
Experts besides pay attention to the behaviour of an agent who – as you can see on another available on the recording network She couldn't hide her weapon in her holster for a fewer seconds. Like the 2 women standing next to her, Trump's cover was left to larger and taller colleagues, and she was nervously scanning the surroundings. It looked not very professional, but erstwhile she was recruited to the USSS she had to meet precisely the same, highly excruciating requirements as her colleagues – so there is no reason to recognise that the temporary failure was decided by the sex.
Of course, pointing out mistakes or not adapting to agents doesn't should be sexism. Will Geddes, global safety expert, On Alex Phillips' show, he correctly notedthat the women protecting Trump in Butler were “half the size of his body” so that they were not an effective shield.
This is not a charge against themselves, and Phillips assures that he has collaborated with incredibly professional, mixed troops – but possibly the USSS should establish a minimal increase of people physically protecting the most crucial politicians in the country. specified a solution could be considered discriminatory (mostly women but besides tiny men), but this would not be unjustified discrimination. erstwhile it comes to protecting life and health, effectiveness should be a priority. However, there are no reasons for a certain increase to be a condition for admission to the agency, as there is no connection with most of the tasks it deals with. These include White House, Treasury Department building, Vice President's residence, planning and coordinating various types of authoritative events, conducting investigations into counterfeiting, financial fraud, identity theft or cybercrime.
USSS agents during training. photograph by Wikimedia CommonsThose who do not direct sexist prejudice, although criticizing the behaviour of agents, pay at least as much attention to the mistakes of agents and male police officers as well as those liable for safety planning.
Whoever did this, Kimberly Cheatle and her subjects, as well as the police officers and their superiors present at the Butler rally, will explain themselves to the court. Among them will be a police officer who, according to the account of the Sheriff of Butler County, approached a crawling on the roof of the bomber before he fired shots, and fell to the ground erstwhile Crooks aimed a firearm at him. If a female had done so, we would have heard of “natural female cowardice and lower stress resistance” (a explanation frequently supported by rat research).
Moreover, people gathered at the rally spotted the bomber before 1 individual was killed and 2 were shot. They raised the alarm, shouting to police officers and agents that “someone is on the roof”, which was besides recorded. However, it seems that the information did not scope the command center. Tim Miller called it “an tremendous communication failure” and assured that erstwhile he himself served at the Secret Service, agents stood next to police officers equipped with radios and if something happened, everyone immediately knew it, and the politician was evacuated.
About precisely where Trump's rally would take place, the servants knew 10 days before the event. The size of the area to be thoroughly checked is determined in advance, and the roof on which the bomber climbed was located outside this area. However, Tim Miller points out that, especially after Kennedy's assassination, tall buildings with a clean line of fire should be included in USSS plans.
That's not what happened. Kimberly Cheatle will be liable for this, but this is 1 of many people – among whom the men – who are liable for safety planning. How would the sex of the manager of the Secret Service influence her decision in this regard? I don't know. The stereotype behind this is that “men usage logic and women usage emotions.” I'm certain we'll find out in a fewer to a twelve months.
It is besides unclear why snipers who pointed their rifles towards the roof of Crooks did not pull the trigger in consequence to the bomber's shots for a long time. However, there are doubts as to whether the allegation should be addressed to them. They were most likely waiting for orders (and these are not issued by the manager of the Secret Service). But again, if it were a female who was slowing down, we would read that men are “more determined and more rapidly making decisions.” net misogynists would not be curious in how the decision-making process was going and who was truly guilty.
With respect to the conditions for admission to the Secret Service, sex differences apply only to parts of fitness tests. Due to the biological conditions (it should be remembered that they concern average and not individual people – there are many women who meet the criteria established for men) the second must run 1.5 miles in a maximum of 10 minutes and 16 seconds, women in 12 minutes and 50 seconds. Can the difference of 2 minutes and 34 seconds truly have a decisive impact on the effectiveness of protecting politicians? How would it affect the USSS during Trump's assassination? The only thing that required intense physical effort was to evacuate the erstwhile president from the stage, which was perfectly handled by an agent who held him under her arm.
As for another tests, there are no differences in the criteria that future agents and agents must meet – from weapon handling to intellectual conditions. Nevertheless, right-wing commentators and their online supporters compose about "lowering standards in the Secret Service", which is to be part of the "woke policy" and put people at risk. Meanwhile, Kimberly Cheatle, who has been the head of the agency since 2022, introduced an affirmation policy – encouraging women to join the USSS – but there was and there was no mention of quotas, parities or lowering requirements for anyone.
The funniest – or truly incredibly hurtful and unfair – is, however, sharing individual clippings from recordings, which are expected to prove the fact of any thesis. If I despise men as much as net followers of peasants' predominance over rationality despise women, I could launch a pursuit utilizing recording from the fresh assassination of the Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fica.
It shows agents – men themselves – who, with almost comical failure, effort to knock down a 70-year-old bomber. However, I uncertainty that I could convince anyone that their behaviour was related to sex (it did not). This would not fall into stereotypes with which so many inactive refuse to say goodbye.
At the first public appearance after the assassination – Milwaukee Republican Convention – Trump appeared in the men's protection. To the right, it's proof that they're more suitable for the role. Finally, they marched very bravely and professionally upright, surrounding the erstwhile president, while nothing threatened him.
