Trump, Musk and Weidel..

myslpolska.info 5 months ago

Donald Trump's press conference and Elon Musk's conversation with Alice Weidel are 2 events on the basis of which we can infer the direction and form of the changes they will effort to introduce in the West.

Donald Trump began his speech with complaints about bureaucratic procedures inhibiting investments and inflation. Much space is devoted to protecting the environment from giant windmills that destruct nature, poison the lives of local residents and origin a failure of orientation by whales. He pointed out the undegradable nature of the waste that is long for respective twelve meters of propeller. “They” said the President-elect – they want everything to be on the current, while heating and cooking on the gas is much more friendly, he talked about pseudo-savings specified as automatics that cut water in taps, showers and dishwashers, which ends in respective times utilizing them.

So-called green energy, according to Trump, makes no sense, and without immense subsidies it would never last on the market. In this passage he spoke like an authentic ecologist from erstwhile that word inactive meant something. He gave a fewer words to China, which consume tremendous amounts of energy to support artificial intelligence and extract it from coal. He condemned the usage by the Democrats of the judiciary to fight political opponents, listing by name cases of bad and good judges. He pointed out the decline in the FBI's prestige, primarily in the context of his engagement in the Capitol attack, suggesting that the FBI had provoked him.

The sentiment was triggered by announcements of joining Canada, Greenland and the Panama Canal. This first conviction of Trump not only benefits from the protection of the U.S. Army, but is besides subsidised by the amount of 200 billion unnecessary imports. "We do not request their cars, neither dairy nor wood, we have everything in excess," he repeated on respective occasions. He predicted a golden age. Another country that wants to join is Greenland, as there are Chinese and Russian ships around it. He did not mention the U.S. base, erstwhile asked about the means it would achieve, he announced customs action towards Denmark. Finally, the case of the Panama Canal, on which the U.S. construction according to Trump spent the equivalent of today's trillion dollars, and 30,000 Americans died in the construction of malaria. president Carter's giving up the Panama Canal was a large mistake. In addition, Panama broke the agreement allowing Chinese to manage the channel. Carter himself, however, judged as a good man. This human climate Trump continued regretting the losses of both parties in the war in Ukraine. He did not attack Russia and its president. He admitted that he understood that Russia did not want NATO on the Ukrainian border, and that he blamed Biden's administration and the way it conducted negotiations.

A policy towards which he expressed his appreciation and respect was the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan, whom he "invited not to harm his natural enemies Kurdom and Erdogan listened to this request". He threatened Mexico, who must start stopping migrants, among whom are many bandits and mentally ill. He invited a negotiator to the phase in Israeli-Palestinian talks. He did not mention the crimes of Israel and the ongoing gehenna of the Palestinians, but the tears of the families of the hostages and threatened that if negotiations did not result, then hell would break out in the mediate East, but he added, "for all."

In addition to amazing plans for neighbors, the most striking were kind and language. Trump is not only a businessman, but besides an educated man, but he spoke consecutive about average human matters, sometimes with irony, sometimes with outrage, in a different place with human concern, and sometimes as if he was playing with the consternation of listeners, but all the time the language and subject of the conversation were specified as an intelligent man could usage at a gathering with a friend, while at the same time all word had meaning, place and speech consistent with the intention of the speaker.

Alice Weidel besides began in an interview with Elon Musk with the economy pointing to Angela Merkel's absurd decisions, who let migrants in and shut down atomic power plants. She criticized bureaucracy and advanced taxes. Musk interjected by pointing out that erstwhile he started the mill close Berlin he received respective copies of an agreement of 25,000 pages and each had to be manually sealed. Weidel has devoted quite a few space to the decline of education and schools, which alternatively of teaching to realize the planet are engaged in in the instillment of vocalism, genderism, etc. They both talked about migrants who, before entering their countries, destruct passports to hinder recognition and deportation. Musk mentioned California, in which the theft of up to $1,000 is impunityless, despite the result of the referendum in which the residents voted to punish it. Shopkeepers and owners must halt thieves themselves, but besides determined can be punished.

Like Trump, they both advocated restoring common sense. At 1 point Musk asked, “Do you admit Israel’s right to exist?” Even via the net and Weidel, she threatened to make certain that yes and that only AfD protected Jews in Germany, and that Germany as a country was called for. Musk breathed with relief and as a prescription to resolve the conflict, he gave improvements in the material situation of the Palestinians who should forgive in return. He did not explain what he understood erstwhile he said "eliminate" those who deny Israel's right to exist. In this part of the conversation, Weidel seemed to have been stressed.

In ideas, Weidel, like JKM, emphasized that Hitler was primarily a socialist, and hatred of Jews was based on jealousy towards people who were successful, wealthy and well educated. She pointed out that Hitler, as now ruling, began by introducing censorship, while freedom of speech is the basis of democracy. Finally, there were a fewer sentences about the motives of Musk's cosmic passion and about religion in God. They both turned out to be looking for agnostics. Weidel thanked that she could talk without labeling herself as an utmost right-wing extremist. She introduced herself and AfD like Trump a fewer days earlier as Conservatives and economical libertarians zealously supporting Israel. In exchange, Musk one more time straight gave her his support in the election.

Both events clearly show the perfect political face of the change of the fresh U.S. administration and its European allies: a return to politics without ideological ornaments and sentiments, but in the interests of a given state and nation, common sense and break with superstitions specified as climatism or rusophobia (Weidel besides reminded a individual of Gates and absurd sanitaryism), liberalism or even economical libertarianism, freedom of speech, simple regulation of law and somewhat enigmatic conservativeism. Everyone changes their language and their way of communicating with the masses. Simplicity, directness and concreteness alternatively of ideological communes. And of course, ladies and gentlemen, no illusions about Palestine.

Olaf Swolkień

photo of wikipedia

Think Poland, No. 3-4 (19-26.01.2025)

Read Entire Article