Most of the bad things that could have happened in this world—especially on the socio-economic level—have already happened, which does not change the fact that respective final nails to the coffin crowning the suicide rush of the global strategy inactive request an accelerated punch. Therefore, the following risks should be identified as a means of identifying the priorities on which the forces of unbreakable opposition should be focused:
1. The alleged digital currencies of central banks.
2. Global "digital wellness networks" permanently linked to the strategy of "sanitary passports".
3. The alleged ESG standards are understood as a condition for doing business.
The implementation of the erstwhile would constitute the closure of global totalitarian monetary communism (including phenomena specified as full monitoring of transactions, deposits with the date of validity, etc.), the creation of the second would be the cementation and consolidation of global hypochondriac totalitarianism, while the imposition of the second would be the introduction of global neo-marksist-Neomaltuzian totalitarianism in which to be or not be any company depends on the recognized ideological whims of political-corporate sits.
Even with all reasonable presumption that effective implementation of these 3 inventions will only accelerate the systemic socio-economic implosion, thus being only a short-term threat, there is no good reason to let this imploding strategy to be buried and drawn into the abyss. Therefore, given its strict global ambitions, it is crucial to guarantee that at least our part of the planet is not subject to any appropriate technical, jurisprudence, organization and ideological infrastructure.
Given the general sentiments and social beliefs, the negotiations are not worst in this respect – but they must be actively strengthened and consistently given an increasingly conscious form, as the stakes are large adequate in this matter, that even the slightest remainder on the laurels and the complacency of passiveness can be regarded as fatal negligence. So let us want ourselves and all men of good will that they would never let akin negligence to occur, knowing perfectly well what they are and what they are defending against.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
