The fact that political reality but besides social and economical reality is presently liberal should not be persuaded. The dispute between globalists and nationalists, the question of whether society or an autonomous individual is more important, and the issue of free trade, private property and statism leave no illusions. However, it is interesting to see how much the liberal explanation of the aforementioned relations is upbuilding and how much it inhibits healthy improvement in both macro and micro dimensions.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, as well as the prevailing hysteria caused by the spread of coronavirus, put into question actions aimed at creating a single global world-management structure. It turns out that the national political model and the associated improvement of 1 centrally managed state, a common army, 1 marketplace of the marketplace that is de facto not political rhetoric anymore but ideological communicative in the form of globalisation has stopped. Vladimir Putin's intervention separates Russia from the West and shows the distinctly different civilizational state ruled by Putin. Insightful observers of political life but besides culturally social life will not see something amazing in this act of war. Anti-individualist and opposing concepts of Cantov's perpetual peace were a determinant of the Russian spirit. Of course, the fact that the isolation of Russia from the West federalism makes a fresh concept based on Eurasia led by Russia and China at the inactivity and silence of India. Consequently, the Anglo-Saxon dominance of the planet and the birth of the multipolar world, in which localisms will play a leading role, has been seriously shaken - in this case, the 2 players I have already mentioned, are the key players. Last year's war movement seems to make the arabian countries in opposition to globalisation consolidate, after all, heavy experienced with the weapons of demoliberism and human rights. The possible in the Asian planet comes to light. In another words, political liberalism is an enemy to states and communities of utopian ideology, which pushes its actions with beautifully sounding slogans, but not with the realities of human nature and state essence. Man is inherently sinful and cannot be corrected by means of all the instruments of convention or agenda so powerfully distributed. Above the national structure contradicts the homophobic human being due to the fact that he functions best in tiny communities with which he feels a spiritual-emotional relationship. 1 state with universal happiness and 1 spirit cannot be created. The group's moderately conservative Law and Justice now uses rhetoric circumstantial to Atlantic neoconservatives. After all, they are going to reinvigorate the concept of the intermari, i.e. the Polish Jagiellonian project, which is simply a more romanticist and liberal initiative than realistic. The threat of escalation of the conflict in Ukraine is becoming dangerous and increasingly tangible.
Moving from the global level below, that is, into the sphere of human relations, we are dealing with an always deeper process of atomicization of society. There is no uncertainty that the process of pulling a man out of functional structures specified as family, states, working environment lasted many years but the events of the last 3 years have increased and deepened the breakdown of human bonds. Of course, the sources of specified a process should be looked at in the views of Austrian school masters, for whom there are only individuals, and societies and states are unnecessary. Currently, the emphasis on being an individual is very strong. The question of self-development becomes more important, the view that life is simply a cheerful self-fulfillment, thereby compromising natural structures, including the family, is spreading. Social liberals besides push aggressive feminism under the banner of LGBT agendas and justify their conduct by the fact that sex is simply a sphere of culture and can be chosen. In specified an argument it is possible to hear echoes of language deconstruction of postmodernists and deficiency of respect for classical anthropology about the existence of 2 beings - women and men. Importantly, without the support of capital- impersonal, transnational force, neoliberalism is not possible. There is besides another problem due to the fact that pure capitalism causes confusion in ethics, contributes to economical crises, reduces the importance of the worker and gains weight of the latest technology. In another words, global capitalism became a false dawn after the fall of the evil empire- the russian Union.
European integration cannot now proceed under the dictatorship of imperialist ideas Germany, however, should become a Europe of many speeds and the accompanying respect for separate national tissues. There is, of course, an increase in the importance of Eurasia and so any projects integrating the continent seem necessary. However, there must not be a situation in which the European Union will step up and replace the borders of the countries with a rubber. I think the dispute about how our planet is expected to look is now a dynamic topic. It must not lead to a situation where state agendas will lead to man's enslavement and become an obedient slave, and on the another hand, private property apotheosis and libertarian reasoning emancipate from family, society and state.
Mateusz Sanicki
