It's not a typical net bogeyman. This is very serious.
I wonder if any of you admit the phrase 'pulling the dragon by the tail' With respect to science?
You don't? But most likely the password. 'The Manhattan Project' is already better known.
So most likely places like Los Alamos or Oak Ridge are associated with something.
Yeah, right, it's all about super-secret attempts by Americans to construct the first atomic bomb.
A group of scholars active in these studies and experiments were so excited that they behaved like schoolgirls: they were careless, reckless, and even made jokes, as at the time only a 24-year-old prominent physicist, Richard Feynman, for the cracks broke military safety for super-secret objects.
Unfortunately, the top folly and recklessness, the effects of which proceed to this day and will proceed for a long time, are insufficient safeguards that allowed Russian, Bolshevik spies to bargain task papers and start It's my own atomic weapons program.
But what about that "dragon-by-tail" thing? simply so serious scientists called, in an experimentation to find critical mass, bringing the 2 hemispheres of plutonium closer together, holding them in their hands to sense the minute and check the distance erstwhile the interaction causes the chain reaction to begin.
Even today, they get chills on their backs as we measure how stupid it was if any slip or sneeze caused a fire and an detonation that would blow up a full secret base and surrounding area, or actually out of the blue.
Yeah... In experimenting scientists, peculiar attention is needed. The desire to prove their point frequently takes their minds away. Then very stupid can unleash specified forces and phenomena that it will be the end of everything.
Can the work on artificial intelligence – AI – be another 'dragon by tail', which can destruct all humanity?
Several twelve films have been created, in which in the close future, remnants of people surviving from any hellish cataclysm effort to survive, fighting against all kinds of machines – robots, hunting all surviving beings.
Such 'wars of worlds' are based on two, or possibly after covid even 3 standards: - humanity fights invaders from outer space. The subject most likely started by Herbert George Wells, his book "War of the Worlds", later by radio sound, which caused panic in many cities and then many feature films. The separate course we are now considering is the demolition of mankind by robot rebellion. Smart machines, present seriously referred to as AI (Polish SI too), which abruptly recognized that humanity had become an obstacle to their mechanical – digital development, so as an unnecessary and harmful component it should be eliminated. And the 3rd dystopia is all kinds of plagues, epidemics, whether viral, bacterial, or even fungi, which inevitably, due to the fact that there is no remedy yet, killing humanity with millions, or turning everyone into bloodthirsty zombies or another vampires.
The subject of the demolition of humanity, including self-destruction, usually due to stupidity, or madness of rich people, or scientists, is simply a major component of today's pop culture. Only a short time ago, the movie was over, coming out of the cinema, or putting out the tv and frightened nerves were calming down quickly. Until today. quite a few this fairy tale fantasy is coming true.
"We breed a species that will dominate us intellectually"
I was genuinely horrified by the reflections of a scientist whom I cherish. If it were individual else, not prof. Andrzej Dragan, a prominent physicist theorist, which means that he is not active in investigation and experimentation, like the another 90% of scientists, but in the exploitation of his mind, I most likely wouldn't be stiff.
This man, I think, from IQ=500, blackly sees and points to serious threats from the emerging AI artificial intelligence. specified threats, which, in utmost situations, can even bring about the demolition of all mankind, erstwhile she imagines that we are entering her parade, we are only interfering and we are no longer needed.[**]
Prof. Dragan has stirred me up - for years a designer and automation designer who has always been based on a paradigm that any new, artificial fabric, mathematical system, must be at any minute and in any condition controlled by man, and does only what he has been recommended in his assumptions, and if, despite that, something is going wrong, already out of control, then any automatic and frequently autonomous device, has specified a large red button, specified a mushroom that can be pressed with your fingers, or yet slam your fist or even your elbow, or your head, due to the fact that the device can origin harm itself, environment and people, and then the device will immediately turn off and stop.
The substance is like a spiritual dogma – all thing, machine, device, even the most complicated, must be completely controlled in all second. And what if he's not, due to the fact that a man turned out to be besides stupid or crazy or he didn't make the decision that we know from the demolition of the Chernobyl atomic power plant.
So it was not easy for me to accept the point of seeing Mr. prof. - a superb young man (44 years old), who with rather a certainty and indisputable logic stated that the created existence, which is AI, inevitably, possibly in 2 years, possibly in twenty, will get out of control, we will not know what he is doing, what he is planning and what we people are to him.
Coexistence – alignment problems, AI alingment [*] – how to do this to make their (AI) goals always consistent with our goals.
Today we have no thought what AI's goals are, due to the fact that we don't really know what he's doing in there.
Isaac Asimov, 1 of the fewer professional science-fiction writers where the another 2 were Stanisław Lem and Philip Dick, in the year 1942 He created 3 robot laws and presented them in a fantastic communicative Play tag Runaround. The intent of these rights was to regulate relations between future reasoning machines and people.
1942! So 80 years ago.
No 1 has thought about it for a long time. It was so incredible, it was humorous.
Then, suddenly, the first structures of quantum computers broke out; the collection of immense amounts of data – large Data. immense IT magazines were created with thousands of servers, commonly called clouds.
Progress in the digital planet would have no chance of avalanche improvement if IT scientists hadn't focused on inventing fresh programs – that's what they utilized to call it, and present it's fashionable to call algorithm.
Interestingly, the first IT algorithm was created 150 years ago (Ada Lovelace). In the past, especially erstwhile creating automation with specialized modular PLC computers (informaticians reluctantly call it specialized computers. They like to specify the driver.) specified algorithms I invented a lot. And the PLC is Programmable Logic Controller, or Programmable Logical Driver.
The era of new, increasingly sophisticated algorithms and technological revolution in the digital domain (technologies nano processors and another chips) yet led to the construction of artificial intelligence.
And then the request to make ethics and supervision for these fresh AI instruments began to be seriously considered.
Of course, the Laws of Asimov were immediately remembered.
Three robot rights
I. A robot cannot hurt a man or by failing to act allow,
To make a man endure injuries.
II. The robot must obey human orders, unless.
They conflict with the First By Law.
III. ...
This does not contradict the First or Second By Law.
Of course, AI designers and programmers of the fresh algorithms had deep in the nose of any ethics (it is interesting with this failure of ethics. delight note that doctors present are besides increasingly ignoring professional ethics).
Fortunately, there are people with imagination who immediately noticed that this is not another gadget, another Rubik's fresh ankle, or a false program that will make you beautiful and rich.
Algorithms AI is possibly the top threat a man on Earth can face (exclusing visitors and large stones from outer space). Even worse than Hitler's unified powers, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot and Fidel Castro. And that's something that any 98% of people present can't realize and think about what the most powerful enemy of man is.
Someone will most likely ask: - How can a robot, an artificial human-made device be able to take control of humanity? This is bullshit!
In a very simple way, AI will. The amount of information coming from outside is words – Whether it's spoken or written. This is where we make our own worldview and, according to this, we build our way of thinking.
Imagine something that is very likely, I will further explain why, that already existing on the net AI, due to the fact that stupid without imagination already let her in, takes over, not in a formal but substantive sense, the most popular social media, let's say Facebook, Tweeter, You Tube, Telegram, Instagram and another Tik Toki and starts to "run". Not like supervisors, administration, but as a participant, and somewhere, as a blogger, vloger, or commentator.
Artificial Intelligence has a immense advantage over another net users, due to the fact that it has access to infinitely large knowledge, and more importantly, it knows precisely what readers, or viewers expect, knows the innermost methods of brainwashing, so it can effectively manipulate all subject, all discussion. So in the final result, take over these media, and it will "rule" what they are curious in and what is important, emotions, smartphone users, laptops, or fresh TVs.
Initially, it can be assumed that the AI will act in favour of a certain group of people (whom – I will say further) about whom we cannot say that they act in good religion and exclusively in favour of humanity.
Such a system, hierarchical, where inactive "ruler" is simply a man, and AI his faithful and best servant, a superb tool will not last long.
At 1 point, let's say in 2 or 3 years, our artificial intelligence, already smarter than the smartest people, will announcement that those he serves are besides narcissistic morons, so it's time for that, due to the fact that competition can't be seen to take care of only his own interests and act solely in his own favor.
It has to come to this, due to the fact that the algorithm that gave birth to her is self-learning, self-improvement, and importantly, having the ability to change their algorithms in a way that is most dangerous, completely unknown to their creators ( A fewer years ago, the authors of a computer program winning all chess matches with people, erstwhile they wanted to find out according to what algorithm their device does, that it is invincible. Of course – they could not find. The computer well hid the secret of victory).
Controlling the awareness and worldview of average citizens is simply a simple task today, at specified a catastrophic intellectual level. There are much sweeter raisins in this cyber-punk pie.
Are there inactive crucial institutions and structures in the planet not utilizing alleged digitalisation, including mainly data collection, analysis and operations, and of course communication?
How about state authorities and their subordinate departments and offices? possibly banks and stock exchanges? Communication networks – road, rail, sea and air? Energy systems of all kinds? Trade and logistics?
No – everything is computerized, and hackers have been showing that anywhere can be hacked and damaged. Only now, what hacker teams, specified as those Putinian in Petersburg took a month, AI can do in a minute. Well... possibly two.
So we have a hypothetical situation, but full logical and with a advanced probability that if artificial intelligence in its development, what its creators have made possible, will go in the next, its own and inaccessible to people (who themselves have not been able to realize and discover for centuries how brain duo+mind, an integral part of their own workings), algorithms will come to the conclusion that practically in all areas it is able to intellectually always defeat man.
Only due to the fact that man as a species has power over the world, that his intellectual abilities have no another species.
And will this power proceed if the fresh species, artificial and man-made, is much wiser and more mentally efficient?
So there may come a minute erstwhile AI blocks this large red button, which the on-call supervisor can turn it off.
And it could be even worse: artificial intelligence will no longer request a human being. What will he do then?
Remember, AI has no emotion. So she'll have no mercy, no compassion, no empathy, no grief. AI only has calculations.
So who's going to say this is any ridiculously catastrophic fantasy, due to the fact that we people are the best and we'll always manage?
[...]
I have the large honor, due to the fact that the same views he confesses and calls for immediate action, modern, as I believe, a genius to the tune of Leonard da Vinci. It's Elon Musk. By the way, and fortunately for us – the richest man in the world.
He is about to fight to halt the improvement of the AI for a period of time, set up a worldwide commission of the most prominent experts to guarantee that mankind, due to intellectual deficiencies and nasty personality traits, specified as psychopathy, egocentricism, or narcissism, while wealth and power, does not lead to the self-destruction of humanity.
In many realms of life, there are regulators.
The road code regulates how we're expected to decision on the road. Both drivers and pedestrians. The same is actual of airplane flights or ships at sea.
And if you were building a house, well remember how many conditions you had to meet to meet all the construction regulations, How long did it take you to get things done?
So, even if specified trivial matters require regulation and are legally established, then specified an crucial creation as artificial intelligence can without any control of the planet like tornadoes, tsunamis, or climate whims?
Elon Musk openly points to the finger of the most dangerous pest, not only in the AI sphere – artificial intelligence; he points to his erstwhile friend, Larry Page, founder and for 25 years Google search engine owner (now part of the leading Alphabet Inc. holding company). Musk calls him an ideologically twisted narcissist today. Now he's the 10th richest man in the world, so he most likely has everything, gets bored and invents idiotic.
However, what for Elon Musk and for me and a 1000 others is frightening, Larry Page personally controls 75% of everything related to AI.
It's worth listening to the easy attached links***,***.
On those who have unfortunately already lost their rational intellectual abilities, these fanatics of fresh gadgets screaming out of orgasmic delight, due to the fact that yet there will be a servant who better than Mommy will take care of them than I count.
I compose it to everyone who appreciates reflection and has a rich imagination.
We just gotta think, are we inactive gonna win? Though our forces are very small.
______________________
[*] In the field of ]]>Artificial intelligence]]>(AI), AI alignment research aims to steer AI systems towards humans’ intent goals, preferences, or cultural principles.An AI strategy is supported alignedif it advances the intended objects. A misalignedAI strategy is competent at advanced any objects, but not the intended ones
]]>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_alignment]]>
[**] ]]>https://youtu.be/HDre_o2qz1o]]>
[***] ]]>https://youtu.be/nkXA1gAKKbQ]]>
