The talker of the Sejm, Simon Holovnia, reported that the illegal Constitutional Court (read: the Kuchenny Przyłubska Court) had issued a decision to freeze, which prohibits the examination of the application for the appointment of the NBP president, Adam Glapiński, before the Court of State. The Hołównia announced that it would not respect this illegal TK decision and that the application for TS for the head of NBP would be processed in accordance with the applicable law. The Załębska occupying position of president of the TK, criticized the Holovnia on this issue.
At a press conference in the Sejm, the Holovnia informed that it had received a copy of the legally defective provision of the Constitutional Court of 17 April concerning the application for the Court of State for Glapinsk.
He explained that the resolution was called “self-secure”. His conclusion is that neither the Marshal of the Sejm, nor the Sejm itself, nor any committee, nor anyone else in the building has the right to deal with the motion for the Court of State for Adam Glapiński.
– Why? – due to the fact that it is strictly prohibited by the Constitutional Tribunal of Mrs Julia Przyłębska. Why? – due to the fact that the Court forbids it – He was reporting to the Holovnia.
In addition, Holovnia informed that the Law Office of the Sejm had carried out ‘very thorough legal analyses’ of the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal. In his opinion, the TK overstepped its competence by issuing this decision. The Hołównia stated that it would not respect the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal and that the application for a Court of State for the president of the NBP would be processed legally.
The talker of the Sejm besides announced that he had presented the Bureau of the Sejm's opinion to lawyers from the Bureau of Experts and Evaluation of the Effects of the Sejm's Regulations on the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal. "The authors of the opinion pointed to the errors made by the Constitutional Tribunal: the deficiency of a legal basis, the ruling in incorrect composition and the mention to the decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal which had already been challenged", he reported.
The Holovnia besides reported that the legal services of the Sejm, following a review of the application to put the president of the NBP before the TS, indicated that "weakness and request to be completed", therefore, in accordance with Article 6 of the Law on the Court of State, present addressed this request to the Constitutional work Commission in order to get an opinion on whether that committee agrees with the opinion of the Sejm lawyers that this request should be sent back to its authors in order to supplement the applicable formal issues.
– If the committee divides this opinion, then we will vote on this substance at the Parliament's bureau - reported.
– If that is the opinion of the committee and the bureau, I will ask (...) applicants to fill in the shortcomings and meet all formal requirements – announced the Holownia.
He stressed that he was a supporter of Glapinski's standing before the TS, as he added, "I think this should be done without any formal or legal doubt".
Doubts, however, appear. The illegal president of the Constitutional Tribunal wrote to Holownia in this case, and 1 of the “judges” of the Court, Krystyna Pavlowicz, known for being and being modest and, in addition, appointed to execute this function in violation of Article 178(3) of the Constitution, published the text of the letter on the X portal.
Przyłębska reminds Hołownia that "The strategy of the Republic of Poland is based on 3 divisions of authorities".
– If the committee divides this opinion, then we will vote on this substance at the Parliament's bureau - reported.
– If that is the opinion of the committee and the bureau, I will ask (...) applicants to fill in the shortcomings and meet all formal requirements – announced the Holownia.
He stressed that he was a supporter of Glapinski's standing before the TS, as he added, "I think this should be done without any formal or legal doubt".
Doubts, however, appear. The president of the Constitutional Tribunal wrote to Holownia, and 1 of the judges of the Courts, Krystyna Pawlowicz, published the letter on the X portal.
Przyłębska reminds Hołownia that "The strategy of the Republic of Poland is based on 3 divisions of authorities".
Mrs. PREZISTA TK has already responded to Mr. Marshal of Halovnia Organisation to his announcement present of another violation of the Constitution, i.e. to refuse to comply with the final and universally binding ruling of the Constitutional Tribunal. pic.twitter.com/NND19kgJHk
— Krystyna Pavlowicz (@KristPawlowicz) April 24, 2024
We remind you that on 26 March, Members of the government's coalition made a preliminary request for the president of the NBP to appear before the Court of State. The proposal was signed by 191 Members. 8 allegations were presented against Glapin, including infringement of the Constitution and the NBP Act by purchasing assets between 2020 and 2021 and currency interventions without appropriate authorisation.
We would like to remind you that the Constitutional Tribunal is presently deprived of the characteristics of the Tribunal established by the Act, erstwhile it is composed of an unauthorised person. Consequently, any judgement given in a composition established in breach of the basic regulation applicable to the selection of judges of the Constitutional Court and consequently affecting the substance of the right to a court established by the Act.
Continued here:
Przyłębska writes to Holownia about the application for the Court of State for Glapinski
