Prison without conviction – in courts hula wind

3obieg.pl 2 years ago

Deer Mountain, 21 February 2023.

Grzegorz Bears “Nil”

58-506 Jelenia Góra, ul. Działkowicza 19

Court of Appeal in Wroclaw

National Prosecutor’s Office

Department of Judicial Procedure

Guide letter

to statements, complaints and requests, including reopening of proceedings II K 38/19 ex officio in connection with the absolute reasons for appeal and the negative procedural grounds of the non-existent judgement II K 38/19 in the absence of a signature on the first and the absence of a complaint from the entitled prosecutor (Regional Prosecutor's Office in Jelenia Góra did not recognise the public interest in conducting the trial in the mode Article 216(1) folding appeal on 3 November 2020, and the justice is simply a ‘contradictory’ arbitrator alternatively than a public prosecutor and private prosecutor).

No authoritative has addressed:

the fact that there is no judgement to be enforced. The justice has not signed an alpha-numeric judgement II K 38/19. It is adequate to consider that specified a judgement does not be and has no legal effect.
alleged infringement 157 § 1 k.p.k. and Article 11 § 1 k.w.,
the plea of illegality of the appeal judgement IV Ka 436/20 maintaining the judgement II K 38/19 the above-mentioned failure to comply with the statutory work from 105 § 2 k.p.k.,
alleged infringement 105 § 4 k. by an unduly appointed justice of the first instance due to the deficiency of service of a complaint to the order II K 38/19 of 18 January 2021,
the plea of non-explaining the doubts which the judgement became final: of an alphanumeric marking II K 38/20 or the signature II K 38/19 and without indicating the date of its validation,
mandatory reopening of proceedings II K 38/19 of his own motion by a decently appointed court on the basis of 542 § 3 k. ori dic Article 439(1)(6), (7), (9) and (11) and Article 17 § 1 points 1, 6 and 9-11 k.p.k.

Service officers utilized private, political law as Stalin did.

On March 15, 1948, the rot master was sentenced to death penalty.The prosecutor accusing Pilecki was Major Czesław Łapinski, president of the judge's staff – Lieutenant Colonel Jan Hryckowian – both erstwhile AK officers, the justice – Captain Józef Brodecki. The jury – 1 justice and 1 juror was against the law at the time.

Grzegorz Niedźwiecki will be unlawfully deprived of his freedom 50 days for the misconduct of justice Wojciech Damascus, who is excluded from the law II S 14/19 dismissed the complaint against the six-year duration of the execution proceedings And all 441/16, conducted in a humiliating manner, contrary to the law (video SN III CZP 23/06). Chronicness of proceedings with the sole responsibility of the enforcement authority. alternatively of paying the victim Gregory Bear (video And all 154/20.) a minimum of PLN 2000, this was imposed hoodily, in violation of the legal qualifications of the prosecution and despite the absence of a complaint from the legitimate prosecutor and the non-proclaiming of the private prosecutor and his lawyer at any main hearing, a fine of PLN 2000. They made a gift to a friend who did a good job.

You can only go to a prison if individual is able to repay a debt, but they are evading it, or if individual fails to meet the deadline set by the court. First of all, you request to realize that cannot be sent to a prison for any of these 2 reasons unless a judgement in the case is given.

It is adequate for the competent courts and the National Prosecutor's Office to comply with the established law, to supplement the formal deficiencies, to respect the attached requests for service to the organization straight afraid and to issue the judgement free of charge in accordance with the procedure Article 157 § 1 k.p.k. 1 certified copy of the judgement of the Legnica territory Court of 24 September 2020 on alphanumerical marking II K 38/19 And the case will be done according to the spirit and the letter of the law. I committed to execute my work erstwhile the goods were delivered.

I request that this reading be served on all the detentions and detention facilities and on the global Court of Justice (ICT) based in The Hague.

Annexes: 30

Grzegorz Bears “Nil” – 5800 days 15 years, 10 months and 15 days Politically Repressed

– – – –

Illegal, political, Stalinist sentences

Nemo iudex in causa sua

Concerns organized crime group, perpetrators of delusional crimes:

PR 3 Ds. 359/17 – II K 1423/18 – V KO 85/18 – II K 38/19(20)

PR 3 Ds. 183/18 – II K 1456/18 – V KO 86/18 – II K 851/18

PR 1 Ds. 535/19 – II K 900/19 – V KO 68/21

On 13 January 2009, the justice of the Deer Mountain territory Court Lucyna Domagaled, as an enforcement body, by order And all 3250/08, called on the debtor Grzegorz Niedźwiecki to carry out within 14 days the act set out in the judgement of the Regional Court of Jelenia Góra of 03.09.2008, the act No. I C 1062/08 placing a announcement of circumstantial content in the mass media alternatively of dismissing the creditor’s request of 10 November 2008 since the execution of the replacement operation under the procedure Article 1050 kp.c.

Thus began the sixteen-year-old gehenna of Grzegorz Niedźwiecki, directed by judges of the territory Court in Jelenia Góra acting in collusion with prosecutors.

There would be no criminal proceedings II K 851/18, II K 38/19, II K 900/19 against the victim of a thirteen-year humiliation if SSR Lucyna demands a resolution And all 3259/08 dismissed in accordance with SN resolution III CZP 23/06Legalis Number 74973 the creditor’s request of 10 November 2008 after the enforcement of the replacement operation under the procedure Article 1050 kp.c.

Continuator of this lawlessness, or justice of the territory Court of Jelenia Góra Paweł Siwek, led the execution And all 3250/08 rod 2466 days which is 6 years, 9 months and 2 days, contrary to the law, imposing a fine of 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 4000, 4000, 4,500, 8,600 PLN on the victim, which he replaced for 180 days in prison.

To Right Criticism unjustified humiliation by public officer Grzegorz Niedźwiecki, submitted by electronic means, has been brought against the harassed criminal trial PR 3 Ds. 183/18 – II K 1456/18 – V KO 86/18 – II K 851/18, conducted in violation of the Polish Victim's Rights Charter and a flagrant insult to procedural law. justice of the territory Court of Złotoryia Jacek Kielar sentenced the hood on 28 February 2019 to Grzegorz Niedźwiecki from Article 238 k.k. for six months in prison, suspended for 3 years and probation of the probation officer, despite the deficiency of material bases and formal accusations. The electronic letter had to be regarded as ineffective (Article 120(2) ori dic Article 119(1), point (4)).

In view of the exhaustion of the formal way of imposing fines on the victim with the conversion to detention, the proceedings were dismissed And all 3250/08, in on 4 August 2015 Procedure And all 3250/08 had to be decommissioned earlier on the basis of Article 824(1)(k), since the creditor has not carried out the action needed to proceed the proceedings within six months.

I was convicted in gangster language of Paul Siwka's SSR.

The continuation of the repression was the justice of Jelenia Góra territory Court Paweł Wozniakwho initiated the procedure And all 441/16 au Request for the re-invite of the debtor to carry out the activities of 26 November 2015 He initiated intentionally in the same unacceptable manner, having cognition and legal awareness of the defective legal qualifications of the execution, obtained from Grzegorz Niedźwiecki.

Paweł Wozniak, seeing that he would not break many years of humiliated Grzegorz Niedźwiecki or following his conscience, decided to most likely exclude himself from illegal conduct And all 441/16. Since the available justice refused to remove him from the case, Paweł Wozniak became sick for about six months, thus forcing him to appoint another justice to the case. The case was taken over by the justice of the Deer Mountain territory Court Anna Romańczyk-Symonovichwho, under the dictation of Vice president Marek Gajdecki, respected the spirit and the letter of law, dismissing the order And all 154/20. on 30 March 2020, the creditor's application from the enforcement of the replacement operation under the procedure Article 1050 kp.c.

SSR Anna Romańczyk-Symonovich challenged the legality of the conduct by SSR of Paweł Siwka, SSR of Paweł Wozniak enforcement of the replacement operation in mode Article 1050 kp.c. and dismiss complaints about the dimension of proceedings by SSO Wojciecha Damascus and the legitimacy of conducting fake criminal trials against victims of repression and many years of humiliation of Grzegorz Niedźwiecki.

The next phase of repression was the submission on 31 October 2018 by the available prosecutor Anna Sorowiak indictment 3 Ds. 359.2017.D to the justice of the Jelenia Góra territory Court Wojciecha Damascus, which dismissed or rejected complaints and complaints about the dimension of enforcement proceedings for the sole responsibility of the enforcement authority.

On 24 September 2020, justice of the Legnica territory Court Aneta Andel She issued a hoodie judgement on the alphanumeric marking in the main proceedings, entering the shoes of a public prosecutor and a private prosecutor (who she could not see) II K 38/20 in proceedings II K 38/19 by fine of a full amount of PLN 2000.

According to Article 439(1)(6) and (9) ori dic Article 113 kp.k. and Article 17 §1(9) k.p.k. the judgement does not be and cannot be legal (No signature and absence of a complaint by a legitimate prosecutor).

I was illegally convicted of supporting SSO Wojciech Damascus (II Part 222/18, II Part 260/18, II S 5/18, II S 12/18, II S 16/18, II S 21/18, II S 8/19, II S 12/19, II S 14/19) who ruled maliciously and partisanly and in violation of the rule iudex inhabilis (Article 379, p. 4.p.c.) in proceedings II S 14/19 (II K 38/19 – V KO 85/18 – II K 1423/18 – 3 Ds. 359/17), in connection with the investigation And all 441/16.

Thank you for the good work of the prosecutor. Anna Sorowiak Judges of the Jelenia Góra territory Court responded by initiating a private complaint with friendly prosecutors PR 1 Ds. 535/19 – II K 900/19 – V KO 68/21 in favour of a service colleague against Grzegorz Niedźwiecki and Tadeusz Gał for criticism and work resulting from Article 304 k.p.k. by e-mail.

Judge of Jelenia Góra territory Court Joanna Dworzycka-Skrobowska issued a warrant judgement on 16 October 2019 II K 900/19 au Article 212(2)(k) fines of PLN 800 in violation Article 500(3), Article 501 point 2 k.p.k.rules nemo iudex in causa sua and despite the absence of a complaint by a legitimate prosecutor (Procurator Anna Surowiak did not feel injured – see Minutes of the hearing) and of the public interest in covering the prosecution of a public offence, alternatively of refusing to initiate proceedings on the basis of Article 51 §2 and §3

Officers extorted property in gangster Tadeusz Gał's amount PLN 1270 and Grzegorz Niedźwiecki in the amount 800 zł, alternatively of refusing to initiate proceedings

– in the absence of evidence of a public-liability offence and a deficiency of social interest in covering a public-private-liability prosecution.

W Article 212(2)(k) the legislator has been liable for the conduct by means of mass communication of another person, group of persons, institutions, legal individual or entity not having legal personality for specified conduct or properties which may degrade it in the public opinion or exposure it to a failure of assurance needed for the position, profession or activity in question. However, in accordance with Paragraph 4 of that provision, the prosecution of this offence is carried out by private prosecution. In cases dealt with by private-law misconduct, the legislator only predicted the interference of the prosecutor if the public interest so requires. In the present case, it was so essential to consider whether the social interest was in favour of being prosecuted on an ex officio basis. It must be noted that the legislator, erstwhile providing for the engagement of the prosecutor in cases of criminal offences prosecuted by a private prosecution, "if so by the public interest", did not specify this concept. However, the doctrine assumes that, in the assessment of the circumstances established in the case in terms of the existence or absence of the public interest in the ex officio prosecution of private actions,the appeal belongs to 3 groups of circumstances which may be applicable for that assessment, including: characterizing the organization to the act (e.g. circumstantial malice, action in a public place, material harm as an effect) and its perpetrator (i.e. its characteristics and individual conditions) relating to the victim (disability, dependence on the perpetrator and another circumstances preventing the victim from exercising his private prosecution powers), related to deficiencies committed during the erstwhile private prosecution proceedings.

Conduct of public prosecution proceedings on the case against the worship of individual persons representing law enforcement and judicial authorities and government administrations, in which the rule is to prosecute private prosecution, It is not justified, first of all, that a lawyer is injured who could defend his rights before a court, for violating his or her honor, if that were his or her will. If, therefore, the victim feels that she is being discussed in this context, ‘indictment“ She will be able to defend herself with respect to the authors “speeches” a private indictment to court. For she is harmed by an adult, self-employed individual who, due to his education, profession, has the cognition and experience essential to formulate a procedural paper initiating court proceedings in a private accusation case..

The case active the prosecutor. Anna Sorowiakwhich, according to the local and professional competence of the judges of the territory Court of Jelenia Góra, they maintained business contacts PR 3 Ds. 359/17 – II K 1423/18 – V KO 85/18 – II K 38/19(20) (video resolution II K 900/19 of 8 July 2019).

Grzegorz Bearwiecki and Tadeusz Gał were coercively convicted for their support, false indictment 3 Ds. 359.2017.D and violation of the Polish Victim's Rights Charter by the disposable prosecutor Anna Surowiak.

Ad. II

Judge of the Legnica territory Court Monika Gliniecka-Kaczmarek and justice of the Legnica territory Court Aleksander Żurakowski They decided to execute judgement II K 38/19, which is not in circulation, replacing the alleged fine of PLN 2000 with 50 days of unlawful imprisonment for their own abuse.

The Judges of the Legnica did not let the suspect to look into the case file II K 38/19 claiming that the files are in the Department of Judicial Proceedings of the National Prosecutor's Office (declared at an empty table), did not issue a ‘convicted’ on multiple requests for a certified copy of the judgement II K 38/19 in mode Article 157 § 1 k.p.k., they did not receive a copy of the judgement to be enforced or an extract from the II Criminal Division of the territory Court of Legnica, with mention to the enforceability, or, in the case of a final judgment, on the date of its finality according to Article 11 § 1 k.w. They ruled for a delusional sentence.

No authoritative has addressed:

the fact that there is no judgement to be enforced. The justice has not signed an alpha-numeric judgement II K 38/19. It is adequate to consider that specified a judgement does not be and has no legal effect.,
alleged infringement 157 § 1 k.p.k. and Article 11 § 1 k.w.,
the plea of illegality of the appeal judgement IV Ka 436/20 maintaining the judgement II K 38/19 the above-mentioned failure to comply with the statutory work from 105 § 2 k.p.k.,
alleged infringement 105 § 4 k. by an unduly appointed justice of the first instance due to the deficiency of service of a complaint to the order II K 38/19 of 18 January 2021,
the plea of non-explaining the doubts which the judgement became final: of an alphanumeric marking II K 38/20 or the signature II K 38/19 and without indicating the date of its validation,
mandatory reopening of proceedings II K 38/19 of his own motion by a decently appointed court on the basis of 542 § 3 k. ori dic Article 439(1)(6), (7), (9) and (11) and Article 17 § 1 points 1, 6 and 9-11 k.p.k.

Service officers utilized private, political law as Stalin did.

No 1 can say that both wine and conduct and the prison conviction imposed by the court No doubt.

Grzegorz Niedwiecki will be illegally, like rot. Witold Pilecki, illegally deprived of freedom.

No 1 can say that, on the basis of the evidence gathered, the circumstances of the action and the guilt of the defendants rise no doubt.

There would be no criminal proceedings II K 851/18, II K 38/19, II K 900/19 against the victim of thirteen years of humiliation if the SSR Lucyna Domaga, by resolution And all 3259/08 dismissed in accordance with SN resolution III CZP 23/06Legalis Number 74973 the creditor’s request of 10 November 2008 after the enforcement of the replacement operation under the procedure Article 1050 kp.c.

Enforcement proceedings lasted together

On 5 January 2021. The decision of 23 December 2020, act No. And all 154/20., decommissioning enforcement proceedings triggered by the provisions of 9 November 2016 and 5 June 2017 on the ref. And all 441/16.

Original order And all 3259/08 was 12 November 2008 until the date of finalisation of the order to discontinue proceedings in the case of 4 August 2015, i.e. until 14 August 2015 2466 days which is 6 years, 9 months and 2 days.

Resignation order issued on 23 December 2020 on the basis of Article 824(1)(2) and (6), approved in 12 January 2021 Enforcement And all 441/16 lasted together from the date of service to the General Court the request for the debtor to be called back on the action of 26 November 2015, i.e. from 8 December 2015 to 12 January 2021 1862 days which is 5 years, 1 period and 4 days.

Retreatment And all 441/16 At the request of the creditor of 26 November 2015, it continued 1862 days 5 years, 1 period and 4 days from 8 December 2015 in which the application was served on the General Court.

Enforcement proceedings since initiation (And all 3259/08, And all 441/16), i.e. from 12 November 2008 until final redemption, i.e. until 12 January 2021 Total sustainable 4444 days which is 12 years, 2 months.

Conclusion And all 154/20., in which the 30 March 2020 the creditor's application was rejected from carrying out the execution under Article 1050 of the Code (validated on 22 July 2020). Procedure And all 154/20. completed in 19 May 2021 reimbursement of the title of enforcement to the creditor.

Enforcement And all 154/20. last 415 days 1 year, 1 period and 20 days.

Enforcement proceedings And all 3259/08, And all 441/16, And all 154/20. non-monetary benefits as defined in the implementing title I C 1062/08 lasts together from 12 November 2008 au 19 May 2021 4571 days which is 12 years, 6 months and 7 days.

Complaints against the dimension of enforcement proceedings from the sole responsibility of the enforcement body were full justified, wrongly and contraryly dismissed or rejected.

Enforcement proceedings against the law (video SN) III CZP 23/06 Legalis Number 74973, Article 824(1)(b), Article 2(2) of the Complaint Act) and criminal proceedings II K 900/19 conducted in breach order proceedings and in private prosecution casesrules nemo iudex in causa sua, Polish Charter of Victim Rights:

Procedure And all 3259/08 they were against the law and good morals SSR Lucyna Domagała and SSR Paweł Siwek au 2466 days 6 years, 9 months and 2 days (12.11.2008) – 14.08.2015).
Procedure And all 441/16 conducted contrary to the law and good customs of SSR Paweł Wozniak au 1862 days 5 years, 1 period and 4 days (08.12.2015 – 12.01.20201),
Procedure And all 154/20. they have been kept on a protracted basis (not issuing recovery orders to the creditor together with the application) SSR Anna Romańczyk-Symonovich and Vice president SR Marek Gajdecki au 415 days 1 year, 1 period and 20 days (30.03.2020 – 19.05.2021).
Enforcement proceedings And all 3259/08, And all 441/16, And all 154/20. non-monetary benefits as defined in the implementing title I C 1062/08 it ran together from 12 November 2008 to 19 May 2021. 4571 days which is 12 years, 6 months and 7 days.
Criminal proceedings II K 900/19, carried out in order and contrary to the law (absence of a complaint by a legitimate prosecutor, 501 point 2 k.p.k., Article 500(3), Article 506(6) of the Code ori dic Article 506(3)) by SSR Joanna Dworzycka-Skrobowska and President of SR Agnieszka Kałużna-Rudowicz to the territory Attorney’s Office in Jelenia Góra Anna Sorowiakwith maintain business contacts (II K 1423/18 – 3 Ds. 359/17) concerns proceedings of the erstwhile president of the Regional Court in Jelenia Góra Wojciecha Damascus (II Part 222/18, II Part 260/18, II S 5/18, II S 12/18, II S 16/18, II S 21/18, II S 8/19, II S 12/19, II S 14/19) who ruled maliciously and partisanly and in violation of the rule iudex inhabilis (Article 379, p. 4.p.c.) in proceedings II S 14/19 (II K 38/19 – V KO 85/18 – II K 1423/18 – 3 Ds. 359/17), in connection with the investigation And all 441/16.

No word of these officers will be invectors, insults, defamation or false notification of the offence (Article 119(1)(4) of the Code). These beings do not know what impartiality, the regulation of law, the rules of action of state bodies, the work to observe law, the decency and principles of social coexistence, human dignity, conscience and the prohibition of torture.

If the sentences were legal and legitimate, public officials would charge Grzegorz Bearwiec with the same acts as a repeater due to the fact that I mention to them as Stalinist criminals. No sane individual would commit sixteen years of state terror.

5390 Day of panic – what my children did to you

https://grugorz-niedwiecki.hexcom.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/11-years-slavery.pdf

https://grugorz-nieświecki.hexcom.net/2016/11/16/poklosie-nothing/

https://grgorz-nieświecki.hexcom.net/dimension-injustice/

https://democracyandjustice.pl/dimension-injustice/

https://www.tribunal-national.pl/producers-criminals/

I request that this complaint be served on all detentions and detention facilities and on the global Court of Justice (ICT) based in The Hague.