In times erstwhile I was active in my work at and outside the university, and I was rather frequently in Germany, I heard frequently the terms Deutsches Siedlungsgiebiet. Nobody's bothered to explain the area. erstwhile I suggested that an analogy could be found here to the deutscher Lebensraum older people than this refused, the younger ones did not know what was going on. No wonder, due to the fact that in the imagination of Europe that Hitler promoted, it meant Osteuropa as Lebensraum, As far as Russia. The population in these areas was not considered to be full-fledged citizens. It was to be a kind of erstwhile subjects of the serfdom and to be at the disposal of fresh masters who would organize this Lebensraum as Grossdeutschland.
From the 1970s until the unification of Germany Deutsches Siedlungsgebiet, This was the area of Poland called Earthlings Recovered, Western and Northern. In fact, Poles themselves did not know what to call them. "Gradure hublands", it was a slogan for propaganda, although in substance this name was possibly the most appropriate historical concept. Currently, any German politicians, negating the reparations due to Poland, point to the anticipation of returning the lands granted to Germany in 1945. They forget that they lost them, just as Poland lost its east areas annexed by the Soviets.
To tell you the truth, these pushes don't make any sense today, and it is precisely Germany that should know it better than anyone else. During the debate on the state of the European Union, Manfred Weber stated that "the thought of national sovereignty is simply a Pothimkin village” and called for further EU centralisation. The EPP leader pointed out that Europe's future lies in transferring greater competences to the Community institutions. "Pothiomkin's village" is synonymous with mystification, deception, and the creation of a image of reality rather different from that of reality. specified a hoax may have been in the days of Catherine II, and it was besides in folk democracies erstwhile organization vouchers were accepted, or foreigners who were told to admire the scenery constructed from far distant with mâché paper. But it's hard to know what Weber meant. 1 thing is known: he has expressed contempt for the sovereignty and the subjectivity of the nations in the European Union. For these nations it should be a informing signal. 1 of the fundamental criteria for the cohesion of the European Union is the regulation of law, according to Weber. He says: “This is simply a fire barrier against representatives of the Law and Justice in Poland, who systematically attack the state of law and free media." It's hard to imagine a more insolent lie. Even Goebbels couldn't do that. Irregularity and contempt for the law are hallmarks of the Tusk government recommended by Weber. This is simply a political criterion, and the regulation of law within the meaning of Weber refers to compliance with EU law, in his view, guaranteeing human rights and respect for minorities, in peculiar morals. Weber, like Tusk, recognises the law as interpreted by the European Union. The economical criterion seems to be generating little question marks, though green order, and lately mercosur and here request vigilance. The trap is simply a applicable criterion, including the ability to adopt EU law and to make effective commitments resulting from EU membership. Weber makes it clear that, speaking about the future of Europe, the transfer of greater competences to the Community institutions. In another words, associate States' constitutions and traditions do not matter.
Weber, in spite of his will, betrayed the Union's real intentions, under the direction of him himself, as regards Parliament of the Union and von der Leyen, as president of the European Commission. That's German, specifically. The policy nonsubjective of these 2 centres of power is to combat the PiS and Hungary, as well as to exclude radicals, in Germany AfD, in France Le Pen and all directions considered populist, far-right, and in the Union's scale opposed to the abolition of vetoes and the adoption of resolutions by simple majority, which the European People's Party, so far, would be able to impose provisions on the Union in fact gathering Germany's political intentions.
Mercosur will let the Germans to take a breath in the wobbly economy, and it will hit countries with developed agriculture, Poland in the first place. The migration pact coming into force from next year will at least offset Germany's problems with the effects of the "herzlich willkommen". What Weber says about the regulation of law shows that he either does not know the way Tusk and his cliques are governed in Poland, or is more corrupted by the fact that the EU's leadership becomes an exhibition of German interests than it may seem.
If the EPP remains in power in the EU, and Tusk will regulation Poland for 2 more years, then hated by Weber Poland (because it is not about the Law and Justice), filled with uninvited guests will be ready to become a state in Europe, a settlement for anyone who wants to be ruled by Polish treuhänder and German masters.
Bringing Poland to specified a state, which will let it to be absorbed by the Union under German rule, requires certain treatments which can only be implemented by Tusk, cosmopolitan with German slope and people uncritically devoted to it forming the Polish government. In fact, their work is far gone. Polish bankruptcy is almost certain, developmental degradation, including economical stagnation. Additionally, there is complete chaos on an crucial section of the dimensions of justice, under the curate of Żurek more politicized than in the times of the Polish People's Republic. Abuses specified as the dismissal of the cases of Nowak, Giertych, Grodzki and the functioning of alleged seismic investigative commissions pursuing alleged abuse of erstwhile power, not to mention the forceful seizure of the prosecutor's office, the media and blocking the office of the legally appointed Barski prosecutor, all of this proves the state's decomposition, and this in turn will let specified expansion of the competences of the Union in Poland that it will equal the end of its sovereign existence.
The effects of the alleged migration pact should be added to this. It will be the population of Poland by a diverse, diverse, culturally diverse settlement movement. It will be the end of this Poland which we pride ourselves on and which was more or little a safe home for generations of our antennas. What will this Poland be called? hard to guess. possibly just as the fresh residents wish. Or Germans. They have names to choose from already tried: any gubernatorship, Marchia, or, as Gustav Kossinna wants, an anointed Mazur (+1931) in his book: Das Weichselland: ein uralter Heimatboden der Germanen. Released 1940 !!!
past cannot be erased, as the foundation cannot be excavated from the structure. This gives us hope that another German jump on others will fail. But what to do with this 3rd of the Polish inhabitants, who under the leadership of specified people as Tusk, Sikorski – smaller figures I omit – are working to fill our past and identity. Do they truly know who they will be as 1 of the many "instituents" of this European Settlement Site – Europeisches Siedlungsgebiet?
