Grzegorz Górny recalled in the article p.t. Murray Rothbard's prophecy is being fulfilled in front of us. Who will break the political and cultural hegemony of the fresh left? (inPoliticy.pl) character of American student Murray Rothbard. – Nota bene of the judaic household with its roots in Poland – died just 30 years ago, a scholar, and in the strict sense of the word, polyhistory amazes with its foresight. He was able to associate various fields, economics, sociology, social philosophy, politics and history, building from this a diagnosis of the current reality, and giving a look at the future rather distant. Rothbard was not a desk theorist. He was looking for solutions to current problems. In addition to creative pacifism, as a libertarian, he advocated the freedom of the individual, opposed the excessive intervention of the state, but at the same time accepted the exercise of the law as a warrant of both the freedom of the individual and the social order.
Rothbard is an opponent of power, who, no substance how she reached her, strives to master the full sphere of public life, imposing his point of view, both community and individual. Traditionally, social order is not only ignored but combated. This applies to family, religion, marriage, national and ideological identity. This happens in the name of democracy, nowhere so unscathed as within the scope of totalitarian power, and after specified a regulation the left, regardless of its category, fresh or old. The usage of democracy as an adjective “fighting” is simply a primitive catch, as is any categorization of democracy, n.p. in the Polish People's Republic. This is not about power based on broad public acceptance, but on prerogatives and goals of the party.
The advanced 1 writes: According to Rothbard, right-wing forces in the West, even erstwhile winning elections, are afraid to usage all the tools available to them. These resistances are not left-wing environments, which, after taking over governments without hesitation, implement the most extremist elements of their programme. Thus, without blinking, they introduce laws that demolish the basic principles of conventional social order, by bombing freedom, religion, marriage, family, national identity, or life of the most vulnerable.
Only individual with a distorted imagination and cognitive process (exemplum is frequently found as an interpreter of the governments of the Civic Coalition MP, Adrian Witczak) can now view these governments as gathering the requirements of libertarianism or even liberalism. Rather, they are characterised by selectively applied principles of left and libertinism, or something which Rothbard opposes, while he sees at the same time how dangerous it is for public life.
Those who do not accept the collapse of the state and many areas of public life hope that the return of the right to power will change this collapse. But they are usually disappointed. due to the fact that only extremist action can bring stability. In our case, not allowing the left to clear the justice strategy of the PRL is constantly producing poisoned fruit. This is the consequence of Minister Żurek, but part of his law noblessa paved the way. The fact that the word "let it be as it was" was patronised by specified people as Adam Strzembosz – others like prof. Zoll – I omit due to the fact that their function in this work was apparent – is the signum of the weakness of the right hand, which is afraid of the grubbing up of evil grown by the widely understood left, due to the fact that the second has at its disposal certain media, any academic circles, frequently filled with mediocrity, but advertising its dubious intellectualism. These forces of a warrior's levitation immediately introduce the "language of combat", frequently produced abroad, disgusting in their obscurantism, reaching into the gutter. The mindless mass of tv viewers is said to object to the disorder of the leftist-libertian rule, it is darkland, moher, fascism, combating progress, etc. Unfortunately, the right is delicate to this, and although it has a number of irrefutable assets, including the state and well-being of citizens during its rule, it cannot benefit from this. The specified fact that it does not enforce court settlements of abuse is simply a safety glent for various dark interests. By word, the right alternatively verbally with caution not allowing evil to be called by name, declares its Pyrrus victory. This in turn dares subversive environments usually assisted by forces hostile to any promotion of Poland, to fight with slander and filthy propaganda. Unfortunately, it affects little ambitious environments. Ones that even present in the face of the bankrupt Coalition are mindlessly voting for it.
However, the situation is not hopeless. The advanced summarizes Rothbard's prescription as follows: Rothbard, however, offered a way to win. In his opinion, the only recipe for success is to bet on a charismatic and populist leader who can turn straight to society, bypassing the hostile media. specified policies must be relentless, dynamic and not afraid of confrontation. He must have the ability to talk to the collective imagination and kidnap the masses. He must be courageous and not afraid to conflict with all who argue him. It must be immune to attacks, as a social and media hatred run will be shot against it. He must feed on a dispute that will not kill him, but strengthen him. specified a person, erstwhile he embraces governments, will not act grudgingly like all another right-wing leaders so far, but will usage all available tools of power to reverse the changes made by the left.
What Rothbard proposes is fundamentally obvious. There's no another solution. past tells us that if in Russia in 1917 specified a individual were on the right side, he would not necessarily gotta return the carat, but the Bolsheviks would not have prevailed. If the burgher parties in Germany had competent leaders who, after the death of Gustav Stressmann in 1929, were missing, Hitler would not have become Chancellor.
1 thing is clear. Rothbard (d. 1995) foresaw what even our present-days do not announcement or understand, but alternatively do not want to realize due to the fact that they like the common interest to their own interests. He besides pointed out how to overcome not only political collapse, but besides moral and existential. Everything depends on how we get to it. Half-life doesn't bode well.
