The word “Judeo-Christian civilization” – with emphasis on the Judeo-Christian adjective – is not my author, and I hope that no apologist of the Roman Curia and its religion will resent the usage of this popular word and what to say, well reflecting all civilization processes related to both Judeo and Christian culture in Europe and the alleged so-called. West.
The attributes of ethics include honesty and justice. Let's see how they are realized in Jude–Christian civilization, but without resorting to philosophical dissertation only on a simple example. Imagine that individual has offered us a joint venture and guarantees that our profit will be proportional to our financial contribution. So if our share of the venture is 10%, our share of the venture is 10%. So the proposal is honest and fair.
And what is the reality that I think we are all dealing with erstwhile we place our money (savings) in banks? Here, it is worth noting that there is no more profitable activity in the state economy than just banking, although banks do not produce anything – but possibly virtual and "debted" money. This was besides noted by Bertold Brecht in "Opera for 3 cents" (1928): “What is simply a bank break-in to establish a bank?”. I ignore the fact that the owners of the vast majority of banks in the West or by whom they are controlled, who is in charge of the full money circulation system, and who are subject to the central banks of the states – I do not want to enter into a large policy to avoid the suspicion of spreading conspiracy theories and anti-Semitism or anti-Zionism in one.
The standard interest rate on savings accounts in IIIRP/Polin ranges from 0.5% to 2% per year. On the another hand, the standard lending rate is around 11% per year. However, it would be incorrect for individual who would think that the cost of his credit was the 11% per year. Unfortunately, not all credit costs are interest, interest, commission and margin on the bank, additional insurance and administrative charges – up to six positions. In total, alternatively of 11% we will reimburse the bank with the amount borrowed, but increased by about 20% – 30%. Do the banks have their own money? NO, their income comes from our investments, from the creation of virtual money and from debt loan lending. The phenomenon of inflation - and its exclusive generator is the banking strategy - which respective times exceeds the amount of interest on our investments, causes the real value to decrease - while banks gain. The law in Judeo-Christian civilization allows for specified banking practices (- ? – And they say we choose the authorities that make up our rights. Oh, my God!), but they have nothing to do with fairness and justice – this is legalised theft by a parasitic private banking strategy on society and the economy. Although it seems logical that the holders of bank savings deposits should at least benefit from their investments in proportion to their size.
Does Judeo-Christian ethics let us to analyse the truth?
Evolution of the number of Holocaust victims au 6 million → 4 million → 2.5 million → 1.1 million
How is that possible? Who lies, who cheats, and why, or possibly makes a mistake, but where?
Therefore, to honesty, justice we will add credibility and enter a dark and dangerous area, but not to the corpheus of Judeo-Christian civilization only to those who are curious about its actual face and have the courage to ask questions, due to the fact that the thing will mention to the mitologized holocaust, whose canonical image is legally protected.
The camp in Auschwitz in almost 5 years of its existence consumed about 1.1 million victims – https://jejeje.pl/updates/last-day-auschwitz
On 21 June 1933, a fewer weeks after Hitler came to power, Zionistische Vereinigung für Deutschland (ZVfD) – the dynamic organization of German Zionists became unexpectedau supportau NSDAP (Nazi Party): We believe that it is the fresh Germany that, thanks to their firm will, can solve the judaic problem, to find a solution to the problem which, in fact, should be solved by all European nations [...] The gratitude of the judaic people becomes the basis of sincere relationship with the German people along with its national and racial realities. [...] We are besides opposed to mixed matrimony and want to keep the purity of the judaic cultural group. [...] To accomplish these applicable goals, Zionism hopes to be able to cooperate with the government even fundamentally hostile Jews... [wededug quote in “Les guerriers d’Israel’; E. Ratier, du. Fact 1995].
At the same time, NSDAP leader, Baron Leopold Itz von Mildenstein, predecessor of Eichmann as head of the judaic Office at SS, is invited by Zionists to Palestine. After a tour of the country along and across (...) and paying peculiar attention to the problem of the kibbutzes, a peculiar envoy accompanied by Kurt Tuchler, a Zionist activist from Berlin, publishes a series of dityrambitic articles in the diary Jozef Goebbels “Der Angriff” [“Ein Nazi fahrt nach Palastina”, “Der Angriff” 26 September-9 October 1934(...)]. This 1 has a commemorative medal on it, On 1 side there is simply a swastika and on the another there is simply a star of David. Following von Mildenstein's journey, the SS body – “Das Schwartz Korps” – will officially announce its support for Zionism [this support will be repeated by Reinhardt Heydrich, head of SS safety service, and in 1937 by Alfred Rosenberg, a national-socialist racism theorist. Tom Segev reports, without specifying precisely the date that Wilhelm Frick, Minister of Interior in Hitler's government, spent his honeymoon in Jerusalem.] – https://www.skarbowcy.pl/blaster/print.php?mod=extarticle&article_id=26084
http://Kurtzenberg.blogspot.com/2015/07/nazista-w-palestyn.html
The star of David – a symbol of Zionism (contrary to popular belief it is not a symbol of Judaism, due to the fact that this function fulfils the menora)
http://blogmedia24.pl/node/63965
World Zionism took advantage of the fact that The U.S. and another countries of the planet closed the gates for judaic immigration as requested by Goldy Meir at a exile conference in Evian, Switzerland in 1938. to save Jews from Germany and Europe from Nazis. The conference agreed to hold the closed gates of all [countries] for judaic immigrants to direct [Jews] only to Palestine. The intent of Zionists and the US in making this decision was to leave To Jews only 2 options: either immigration to Palestine or insertion into Nazi internment camps. – https://www2.memri.org/polish/representative-plo-community-target-nazistow-and-Zionists-was-cleaning-German-from-sid-and-deporting-their-to-Arabic-palestin/1226
Hannah Arendt, analyzing Eichmann's activities in Vienna, writes about direct cooperation between judaic leadership and the Nazi regime. We are talking about exile, after Anschluss in 1938, for judaic money in 18 months 150 1000 Austrian Jews from their homeland. In this case, it emphasizes the direct participation of judaic activists in this, perhaps, fancy affair. Based on Reinhard Heydrich's idea10 that rich Jews finance forced emigration of mediocre Jews. Eichmann organized a thoughtful transmission belt that rapidly overcame all bureaucratic obstacles in order to banish Austrian Jews. Hannah Arendt emphasizes that this action was attended by activists of the judaic municipality in Vienna, whom Eichmann had previously liberated from concentration camps.
...
Hannah Arendt is peculiarly delicate to the selective particularity of Palestinian Zionists: They were sent to Europe by their communities settled in Palestine: they did not deal with rescue action: "It was not their business." They wanted to select ‘appropriate material’12. Hannah Arendt here uses consciously or possibly subconsciously the ominous word utilized by the Zionist movement in the context of the selection of Jews for immigration. In their eyes, the main enemy was Britain, which drastically limited emigration to Palestine, not Nazism and fascism preventing Jews from being average in Germany and Austria. Therefore, they could have been partners in dealing with Nazi authorities on an almost-partner basis.
Arendt besides notes: Of course, they did not realize the sinister consequences of these negotiations, which had hidden the future. But that doesn't change the fact that and they felt that the Jews themselves should do the substance of selecting the Jews to be saved. And here's a clear natural conclusion: It was this fundamental mistake in judgement that yet led to a situation where omitted selection Most Jews faced 2 enemies: Nazi and judaic authorities13. – http://www.oipc.pl/files/Becker.pdf
And how will it yet be with this anti-Semitism, with the Oświęcim lie in the IIIRP/Polin judiciary in Judeo-Christian civilization, who will turn out to be a liar, or again those who ask questions and effort to tell the fact – ?https://x.com/i/status/1945890706297372672
Dariusz Kosiur
