As the planet of professional pests present does not consist of monolithic and easy identifiable dictatorships, only of the vague entanglements of global political, bureaucratic, corporate and cateronic structures, consistent opposition to cash liquidation requires much more than just torpedoing government laws or EU directives.
In this context, there is besides a request for sensitivity to reduce the limits of ATM withdrawals, to increase the charges for the usage of ATMs, to phase out ATMs, to increase commissions on cash payments in bank branches, to refuse to accept cash payments by individual companies (especially those large, influential and politically correlated) and another specified movements calculated on the gradual cooking of frogs in a boiler of a "digital economy", which should not be considered as "voluntary decisions of independent marketplace operators".
In another words, tools specified as consciously targeted consumer boycott, clearly and regularly articleed demands on nominally private financial entities and prudently predicting any anti-cash “side effects” arising from the implementation of various “digital facilities” under the “public-private partnership” must be added to the work of fighting for the preservation of transactional privacy, control of the value of accumulated monetary assets and sovereignty over the highly centralised and political infrastructure. Only then will it be possible to be sure, that the possible monetary totalitarianism did not leave any hidden field for action.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
