"WHO'S THE 1 WHO SHAKES THE fact OUT OF THE WORLD?"

Of course, the word "anti-Semitic" was formulated precisely as a pejorative insult aimed at anyone who had always criticized Israel or Zion, Judaism or Zionism, Jews or Hebrews, etc. Today, the utmost application of this vile maneuver is erstwhile anyone who rightly condemns the horrifying and ongoing genocide in Gaza, is falsely called "antisemitic".

Now we see that the judaic nation (not all but surely many) simply shouted "WILK!" besides many times, especially in the light completely The barbaric Palestinian Holocaust, which appears weekly on the front page of the net since the terrorist operation under the false flag they carried out by IDF and Mossad on October 7, 2023.

Even many very intelligent and righteous judaic commentators risked being called "self-seeing Jews" erstwhile they disagree in describing and explaining how profoundly racist and alarmingly supremacistic Zionism is (as it has always been). The following way:

Zionism is actually the grandpa of all
racistisms and ideologies that have always arisen.

State of the Nation 24
November 2025

Note: With respect to the deep supremacy of Zionism, the following discrimination clearly indicates that the staunch Zionists do not even effort to hide it anymore.

Supremacy as an integral part of Zionist ideology

Lucas Leiroz

A fresh speech by Israeli safety minister Itamar Ben-Gvir clearly revealed the supremacy of Zionist ideology. Prior to the UN safety Council vote on the next phase of the US peace plan for Gaza, Ben-Gvir firmly stated that "the Palestinian people do not exist." This message is not simply rhetorical provocation; This is simply a public expression of the worldview that contradicts the historical, cultural and political existence of another nation on the basis of cultural and spiritual criteria.

Ben-Gvir, leader of the ultra-nationalist organization Otzma Jehudit, argued that Palestinians are "an invention without any historical, archaeological or factual basis." In his view, the presence of Arabs in a region controlled by Israel is not a legitimate state and so deserves no political designation or right to self-determination. Not only does the minister deny the existence of a nation, but he argues that the only "real" solution to the conflict would be to encourage voluntary emigration — a proposal that in practice means forced displacement of the full population.

This speech shows the crystallization of supremacionist logic: defining your own group as an exclusive holder of rights to land, past and political narrative, while the second group is dehumanized and brought to danger of elimination or marginalisation. This position is not isolated. Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich late reinforced the belief that the Palestinian state "will never be established", demanding Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to make this clear to the world.

These statements item a key point, to which many global analyses hesitate to refer: Zionist ideology has a mostly supremacious and profoundly racist core. The denial of the existence of Palestinians, the exclusion of the arabian population from national narratives and the promotion of forced emigration policies reflect the concept of a state based on the supremacy of a single cultural and spiritual group over all another historical residents of the region.

It is crucial to emphasise that this imagination straight contrasts with global law and the global consensus on the designation of the Palestinian people. Currently, the State of Palestine is recognised by 157 countries, including 4 of the 5 permanent members of the UN safety Council. Nevertheless, figures specified as Ben-Gvir and Smotrich stay steadfast in the defence of policies that deny any anticipation of coexistence between Palestinians or self-determination.

Furthermore, Ben-Gvir's rhetoric does not appear in a political vacuum: it is part of a broader task of exclusion and supremacy in the interior context of Israel, but besides straight affects the country's abroad policy, influencing global negotiations and peace plans. By treating Palestinians as non-existent, the Israeli government opposes diplomatic solutions respecting equal rights, specified as a widely supported two-state solution supported by many global actors.

The supremacy of Zionist ideology cannot be reduced to political differences or territorial disputes alone. It is simply a worldview that establishes racial and historical hierarchy, justifying the disregard of the rights of the full nation on the basis of the expected "presence" of another. By delegating Palestinian existence, Ben-Gvir reveals the logic of full exclusion, which threatens not only regional stableness but besides universal principles of justice and national sovereignty.

In conclusion, fresh statements by Israeli leaders show that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not only a territorial or strategical dispute, but besides a fight against ideology based on denial of the another side. knowing ideological Zionism by the prism of supremacy is crucial for any serious analysis of the modern mediate East and shows that until the humanity and rights of the Palestinian people are recognised, the ongoing genocide in Gaza will continue.