There is no fundamental belief that the socio-political conflict of the elite-mass; all those democratic, Marxist, anarchist theories that plan it are nonsense. There is no “classical” worldwide solidarity of “the things on top” against “the things on the bottom” or the universal front of “the things on the bottom” against “the things on top”. Tales about the conspiracy of elite exploiters against peoples or about the conspiracy and the boiling of mobs against elites-currants of culture are only conspiracy theories created by marginalized socio-political groups (failed aristocracy, revolutionary groups).
The primary (self-sufficient) social cell is simply a strain (clan-rod, band-camracy of men). The ‘trains’ (genealogical or ‘totemical’) fight and ally 1 against another – sometimes those who at the top against the bottom, but sometimes those who at the bottom with those who at the bottom against the others at the bottom or those who at the top with those who at the bottom against the another at the top.
There are, of course, different systems stabilizing certain socio-political arrangements. But everything in the Universe is entropy – socio-political and civilizational systems too. In this entropy strategy there are besides cracks among the elite: either then any faction “from above” seeks to base “at the bottom” against another “on the top” fractions or forceful “from the bottom” factions choice out for themselves allies “on the top” – then comes the revolution.
Any realistic anti-system movement must be aware of these truths. It is not the “conspiracy of the elite” (or the “serious mob” or “street” as the epigons of elitist conservatism have yet to repeat), but the strategy (the circumstantial 1 – the demoliberal one, not everyone) is simply a problem. The mention point is not any ‘class’, ‘mass’, ‘nations’, ‘family’, ‘humanity’, ‘units’ or another inventions of Western thought, but strains-bands (fraternities-camracies).
Consequently, there will never be unconditional “internationalist solidarity” in the Anti-system (video: attitude to the Palestinian case), but only plays various factions. Secondly, erstwhile the strategy ceases to be a supplier of certain goods to a social entity, if any value (the same or the replacement) can supply the Anti-system to him, then specified an entity can change sides.
Thirdly, the alternate to the suppressing Nature (human) of the "liberal" strategy will not be another isolated from the reality of the utopia. The anti-system of utopian fantasies must argue realism: economic, sociological, ethical, political. The real anti-system must not reheat any delusions founding the present system: “units”, “human dignity”, “nations”, equality, democracy, freedom or another akin nonsense.
The alternate to the strategy is Nature: Entocentrism, Patriarchism, Terristalism, acceptance that everything is not to be consumed more than it is expected to be, and Cosmos is not static only is the ellipse of eternal return in which life can only be born that death, that force is the rule of the world, that man belongs to Nature as all another elements of the Cosmos, that everything is "finished" and has its "limits" even if they happen in the form and scale for us inconclusive (the geometry of the Universe), that the only universal imperative is "the basket closer to the body" or the absence of universal imperatives, that the natural social cell is indeed self-sufficient—i.e. a group of solidarityable men along with the possession.
The second does not necessarily mean anarchism, but surely excludes the "United National State" and the "modern legal order" of the Western type. The only 2 officially undemocratic states in the planet present are Afghanistan, where the confederation of strain patriarchs and Saudi Arabia rules 1 patriarchal strain of Saudis. It is so possible to "altersystem": a political order recognising human nature and functioning in the modern world.
Ronald Lasecki
