On Tuesday, news about the large Orchestra of Christmas Charity and various branches of the Border defender appeared on the network. 1 of the auctions for the WOŚP was to take part in a patrol along the Polish-Belarusian border. The same 1 where you can find a corpse, where there are raids on migrants whose services destruct phones so they don't have contact with smugglers, but, by the way, with the full world, where migrants are beaten and beaten and even shot. They are frequently in a state that requires urgent medical intervention.
I didn't have time to read the auction's description, but I don't think it was specified if a fortunate winner could number on a pushback. But without the thought of visiting a place that is symbolized by razor wire coils, to do a charity auction, it is shockingly perverse. besides perverse to hold and after a short storm on social media, the auction disappeared from the site. any time later, the Border defender wrote a brief message that she had resigned. “Who even came up with this idea?” many netizens wondered, although the co-operation of the WOŚPxSG is simply a coherent component of the changing approach to border issues.
Symethism and Human Rights
I'd pass for that cycle. Text by Stephen Hardoch, which shifts fears of migration to an undetermined folk class whose sense of safety and comfort any indeterminate mediate class would like to sale for inexpensive uber rides. By the way, Hardoch created something that can be interpreted as a golden expression of xenophobia: "The desire to live and live among people with whom language and culture share is besides understandable." If this is simply a understandable desire, and if you presume that its implementation should be a norm, it means that the planet has long gone by. And any journey of ours, with permanent migration not to mention, can make discomfort for those who want to be surrounded by people with whom they share language and culture. Let him stay still.
As another milestone in building a fresh liberal consensus around the border, there is no uncertainty famous text by Margaret Tomczakwhich has grown into a cycle of polemics and polemics. In my opinion, their large number is due to the confusion and confusion of various phenomena and areas which the author of wholesale criticisms. In a nutshell: Tomczak devastates the narratives created by activists and organisations dealing with humanitarian aid on the Polish-Belarusian border as false, at best badly deficient. Migrants can be dishonest, lie and manipulate on the way to the goal of Western Europe, in Poland they do not want to stay. There's no telling what to do with them, no one's come up with anything better than fences and pushbacks.
Tomczak apologizes with a realpolitik and sprinkles her head with ash that she was drawn into a communicative network of activists and together with them she created “false knowledge”. At times, it may seem that this communicative was shoved down her throat. He resents that these people and organizations against whom the erstwhile government launched a gigantic run of hatred, making them agents Putin and Lukashenko and traitors of Poland, cared for their own safety, alternatively of conducting substantive discussions and seeking optimal solutions in the repressive conditions of war against migration created by Kamiński and Błaszczak, including criminalization of aid for migrants. Tomczak notes that the border framework of the communicative was asked by the Government of the United Right, but it is not to the government, present or previous, that directs his remarks
In 1 of her texts, Tomczak admits, possibly not explicitly, but rather clearly, that she was incapable to communicate with the hero to set boundaries and to replace a proxy. It wasn't a journalistic standard at our border. And the presence of journalists who could not decide whether they were reporting events or participating in them was peculiarly problematic. Although Margaret Tomczak's text can be read as a confession to her own journalistic inability, it allowed her journalistically to exist. Confession has been a popular species lately. any of them are, The others go down.
Margaret Tomczak underwent metamorphosis after these experiments. Now he thinks activists are making illogical demands, demanding the impossible. Like the Border defender not doing her job. They can naively request the dismantling of the concertina, which hurts people and animals. Or they believe that the limit on the ground is wrong, and people have the right to unlimited movement and choice of place to live. I know, it's Unpopular View, even among those helping migrants. He can be found. in the statements of Polish bishopsNot just anarchist nomads. But it is known – under the force of realpolitik ideas break, besides humanitarianism and human rights, and even the law in general. All these are things that lead to the eclipse of the head and the curved view of migration. Sometimes laws just can't be applied. It's everywhere, let's just get over it.
Is there any another way to put your accents?
In the same stream of texts normalising the situation at the border and I would put any statements by Jakub Majmurek, in which the issue of border protection is dealt with, for example, as 1 of those things on which the Law and Justice Government was right. In his opinion, the erstwhile authority did this ineptly, but the findings were correct – the crisis is fueled by the Lukashenko regime. I will skip the fact that there was no request for strong government heads to do so, and if there was any agreement between border activists and ministers at all, that the Belarusian services which usage migration as a tool of force on Poland and the European Union were behind the crisis. The bone of disagreement was the methods of handling this challenge. Majmurek cites migration specialist Maciej Duszczyk, who in an interview given to him earlier explained that the barrier was built besides close to the border. It's like you just gotta build it further and the problem is over. And as if it were the only issue that triggered the humanitarian crisis. And it's like no 1 lives close the border with Belarus, so you can build a barrier anywhere.
Soon after interview given to Jakub Majmurekwhere there are more interesting flowers. For example, Duszczyk praises the barrier on the border with Russia. Theoretically and technically, it may be more perfect, but we would only see its effectiveness if there were mass attempts to cross the border with the royal circuit. Meanwhile, Poland's intensively promoted migration way by this region remains stubbornly closed.
Duszczyk became Deputy Minister at the Ministry of abroad Affairs, and the area of his activity is migration. After this technocratic nomination, 1 would anticipate that any fresh quality would appear on the Polish-Belarusian border, but a fewer media statements by the minister-expert rapidly dispelled the most modest even illusions. In the end, Duszczyk criticized the Law and Justice Government at the level of efficiency of actions, not their legitimacy or character. The current government on the Polish-Belarusian border has no another tools than the erstwhile one, it can only impose cosmetic amendments on the communicative of predecessors. Just do the same, but say different. Otherwise, put your accents on.
It's not time to talk about violence.
The most crucial thing is safety, you know, that doesn't change. Therefore, from the fresh ministers we hear enigmatic announcements of the sealing of the border, as if we were dealing with an immediate hydraulic problem, not a global challenge that no walls, fences and border dams have dealt with so far. Sealing the border is expected to make certain there are no pushbacks. No migrants, no pushbacks, what don't you understand? It is inactive unclear how this will be achieved, but the word "perimetry" takes on a sacred dimension. He's like the Holy Grail, inactive out of range, but his discovery is about to start a fresh era.
Donald Tusk's government functions under permanent political crisis, so it's no wonder he's not looking for a contract with the services. Exchange of commandants is enough, the remainder should be patted on the back and thank you for your service. This is not the time to look at questionable procedures, verbal orders, and widespread force at the border. Instead, it is better to powder the image of the service, especially the Border Guard. The Kolab of WOŚP and SG? Why not? Participation in a patrol under a barrier on the border with Belarus sounds like a jackpot. In the end, everything jumped to its place, there is national consent, humane distortions managed to avert. The full nation builds its border, thank the activists.
Inconsistency in Tomczak's, Hardach's or Duszczyk's speeches nobody peculiarly hunts, does not dig. Subjecting them to criticism from a value or law position becomes a blunder and exposes them to ridiculousness. The Liberal mainstream gladly accepts a set of arguments that let force to normalise and over the border situation to go to the agenda. There's no request to pretend anymore. It was not appropriate to stand on the same side on which Błaszczak stood, the more Kamiński. erstwhile the government was angry, it was all wrong. erstwhile a government is good, then possibly not everything it does is good, but if it does, it's definitely necessary, otherwise it's impossible. And since that's what the prof. says about these cases, he must be right. Besides, that's the world, goodbye values, hello realpolitik!
