Why would Kaczyński say that?

Practically all politician has learned that words are of large importance and what is more, political interpretations are ruthless in their abbreviation. A large scandal broke out recently, followed by a wave of critical comments on Grzegorz Braun. Bran’s scandalous message on gas chambers it was immediately reduced to undermine the Holocaust, although specified an eccentric politician did not go. A akin adventure was met by Sławomir Mentzen, who, for a change, talked about “the state of his dreams” where studies are paid. This message was brutally utilized in the presidential run and converted to a point of Mentzen's program.

We will find hundreds and thousands of specified examples in politics, so experienced politicians weigh words or diplomatically ignore certain topics that may harm us. No uncertainty 1 of the more experienced politicians is Jarosław Kaczyński and both supporters and critics of the president of the Law and Justice Office admit it. However, it has happened to Kaczyński and it is not erstwhile to jump out with a speech that continues after him to this day. The perfect examples of specified statements are: “successful murders” or “worst sort”, but these are examples from the emotional shelf. However, today, on the 81st anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising Jarosław Kaczyński presented his version of the communicative completely coolly, not having much to do with actual past and above all with political calculation:

Kaczyński claims that it was not Ukrainians who participated in the Warsaw Reich.

Just a lie. pic.twitter.com/FAvxHmxWBJ

- Coolfonpl (@coolfonpl) August 1, 2025

Even if this version of events were based on facts, and it is definitely not in this part concerning Ukrainians' participation in the slaughter of civilians, it is politically completely incomprehensible or naive. A fewer good years. The doctrine of Jarosław Kaczyński no longer works: “from us nothing to the right”. On the right side of PiS grew not 1 but 2 rival parties. The Confederacy is more to the right than the PiS, not to mention the Confederation of the Polish Crown, the organization of Grzegorz Braun. Both of these formations built their potential, primarily on PiS errors, and among the most crucial errors was the infantile policy towards Ukraine. And of course, it was the voters of both the Confederacy who first spoke and expressed their outrage.

There is no request to be an experienced politician to anticipate the effects of specified an explanation of history, and since a very experienced politician has done so, the question of what he intended should be asked. The first thing that comes to head is the continuation of the infantile policy towards Ukraine, which Poland has repeatedly treated without any gratitude and has sent a full lot of aggressive messages relating to current and historical matters. However, this explanation would argue with the assurances of many PiS politicians that the party's attitude towards relations with Ukraine has changed radically. The problem is that politicians always say something about something, after which they do the opposite, and possibly that is precisely what happened in this case.

The second explanation refers to a war on the right, in which all 3 parties are very powerfully involved. Jarosław Kaczyński has moved a completely different position, which may propose that he wants to “take over the narrative”. If that were true, then PiS president completely lost his political instinct and nose to social sentiments. Most right-wing voters, if not the majority of Poles, surely are sick and tired of whitewashing the attitudes of Ukrainians themselves, as well as writing past again, with the silence of the Volyn massacre, and now the Ukrainian “absence” in killing the civilian population of Warsaw has arrived. With specified statements and the deficiency of reflection of the Law and Justice, there is no chance of a 30% support, not to mention dreams of 40%.

We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!