Waćkowski: Collective West and Maia Sandu play va banque

In just a period and a half there will be parliamentary elections in Moldova. They make immense emotions, and Moldovan president Maia Sandu and the collective West behind her play very hard.

At the same time, there is simply a good chance that after the Moldovan parliamentary elections, multi-vector forces will come to power.

Without the promises of the Union and NATO

Moldovan president Maia Sandu studied in the US, worked at the planet Bank. She is portrayed by Western media as a beautiful face of fighting oligarchy, she was a minister of education in the oligarchy government Vlada Filata. A presidential election was held in November 2020. Sandu did not exhibit, as in earlier campaignsShe spoke about the settlement of oligarchs, thieves, including erstwhile president Igora Dodon. This rhetoric undoubtedly influenced the attitude of any voters.

Mysterious Usati

In the first round, Sandu scored 36.16%, Dodon – 32.61%, Renato Usati - 16.90%. The another candidates were open supporters of the unification of Romania and Moldova, so it was clear that their voters would support Sandu. The consequence of the second circular was not foregone. Usati is simply a mysterious figure; a charismatic politician, has always declared his will to cooperate with Russia,was Mayor Bielec, the second largest city in Moldova. In 2016, a court controlled by oligarchs Vlada Plathoniuk blocked the launch of Usati in the parliamentary elections. Usati was pursued by authorities controlled by Plathoniuk, hiding in Moscow. He returned to Moldova in the summertime of 2019. Before the second circular became sensational: Usati did not support Sandu directly, but asked his constituents not to vote for Dodon. In the first circular in Bielce Usati scored 50%, Sandu – 15%, Dodon – 29%. In the second circular in Bielce, Dodon scored 66% and Sandu scored 34%. In Falesti in the first circular Usati scored 43%, Dodon – 29%, Sandu – 18%. In the second round, Dodon scored 61% and Sandu scored 39%. As we can see, Sandu took over a large part of Usati's electorate, despite the theoretically different geopolitical orientation.

Silence of the Crisis

Sandu's triumph meant that earlier parliamentary elections in Moldova would come sooner or later. The election was held on July 11, 2021. A coalition of the Socialist organization of the Republic of Moldova and the Communist organization of Moldova took place before the elections. The election was won by the Action and Solidarity Party, grouprelatedfrom Sandu that won52.80%, PSRM from PKM scored 27.17%. The Shora organization went to parliament with a score of 5.74%, Usati's organization scored 4.10% (the mediocre consequence of Usati's organization was caused by his volt in the presidential election, which did nothing good to the multi-vector electorate and the protest electorate). Prime Minister of Moldova after the parliamentary elections became Natalia Gavrilitawho besides studied in the US and worked at the planet Bank. The rulers of Moldova suppressed violently peaceful protests, persecuted independent media, and stubbornly the judiciary. There is an antisocial economical policy in Moldova, the retirement age has been extended. Anglo-Saxons and their European vassals stay silent; if akin practices were carried out by countries governed by their opponents, it would be possible toauexpect attempts to make a colorful revolution, and even, depending on the distance and capabilities, military intervention. After Gavrilita compromised, she was replaced in the Prime Minister's seat Dorin Recean.

USAID money election

In autumn 2024, the Moldovan presidential elections were held. Many abuses took place in these elections. The Moldovan electoral committee was funded by USAID funds. Only 2 venues were made available for voting for Moldovan citizens surviving in the Russian Federation (in Russia there are about 400-600 000 Moldovan citizens). In addition, voting cards for Moldovan citizens in the Russian Federation are provided for only 10 000. In France, Germany, Italy, voters could vote in a twelve polling stations.

Foreigner chooses Sandu

Maia Sandu in the first circular gained 42.49%. The second circular of the presidential election was attended by the erstwhile lawyer General supported by the Socialist organization of the Republic of Moldova Alexander Stoianoglo (is Gagauz). Stoianoglo scored 25.95%. The 3rd place was taken by Renato Usati, which gained 13.79%. She took 4th place Irina Vlah (Vlah was a sashkan of Gagauzia); she scored 5.38%. She was followed by a erstwhile prosecutor. Victoria Furtună with 4.45%. The erstwhile Prime Minister of Moldova was behind her Vasile Tarlev (Tarlev is Bulgarian); he gained 3.19%.Behind Tarlev was another erstwhile Prime Minister of Moldova Ion Chicuwhich earned 2.06%. Before the second circular of Stoianoglo was straight supported by Victoria Furtună. Chicu, Tarlev, Vlah appealed to their voters to vote against Sandu. The position was not occupied by Usati, however, given that Sandu camp ruled (in 2020 it was different), the majority of Usati voters surely voted for Stoianoglo. In the first circular at 1,546,031 votes as many as 239,419 votes were from abroad. abroad in the first round, the President-in-Office of Moldova gained as much as 70.71%.

Foreign Affairs

The events that took place before the second circular indicated that Stoianoglu had a chance to defeat Sandu. However, any were one more time hampered and others were facilitated by voting abroad. In addition, there were abruptly difficulties on the bridges over Dniester, the passage of unusual trucks. Even the false bomb alarms came up. These actions were intended to impede the voting of the people of Transnistrians who hold Moldovan passports and could so vote in the presidential election (the citizens of Transnistrians powerfully support pro-Russian and multi-vector politicians in Moldova). In the second round, Maia Sandu scored 55.35% and her competitor 44.65%. 1,680 569 votes were cast, of which as many as 327 851 were given abroad. The abroad president of Moldova scored 82.92%. There is so a immense increase in abroad voices in the second round. If the vote had not taken place abroad, the election would have won Stoianoglo with a score of 50.80%.

Repressions

Gagauzia is an autonomous area in Moldova. Gagauzi are a people of Turkish origin, they profess Orthodoxy. At the head of the Gaguasia is simply a baccan, which has rather quite a few crops. In 2023, the election for the sashken of Gagusia won Evghenia Guțul. It is worth noting that each candidate supported cooperation with the Russian Federation (only those who competed in these elections). Mikhail Formuzal, the baskan of Gaguasia in 2006-2015, he advocated cooperation, both with the Russian Federation and with the EU). Guțul is associated with the Shora Party. Bashkan was not afraid of contacts and cooperation with Russian politicians. She even met with the president Vladimir Putin. At the same time, the Mai Sandu government broke Moldovan law, due to the fact that according to it, the sashcan of Moldova is simply a minister without a portfolio in the Moldovan government and the Moldovan authorities failed to comply with it. The prosecutors controlled by the political camp, president of Moldova, launched an investigation into the illegal financing of the Guțul electoral campaign. Bakkan Gagauzia was in custody, then under home arrest. On 5 August 2025, she was sentenced by the court to 7 years in prison for alleged illegal backing of an election campaign, as well as for taking money from the Russian Federation for an election campaign. The paragraphs from which Guțul was convicted should be utilized to convict any policy in Moldova. Maia Sandu has in Gagauzialess support than a neo-banderer Viktor Yushchenko On Donbas. Sandu scored 2.26% in the first circular in Gagauzia, while in the second circular 2.96%.

Delegated

In connection with the illegalization of the Szor Party, Ilan Szor He started creating more parties like Rebirth, Chance, Victory. The Moldovan electoral committee did not agree to the participation of parties who have any ties to it. Scrub is simply a controversial figure, but no 1 is disturbed by participation in the electoral process of pro-Western oligarchs, the financing of abroad electoral bodies, overt interference in the elections in Moldova of the European Commission headed by Ursula von der Leyen. The president of Moldova is no longer playing conventions and is simply saying that he is happy that France interferes in the elections in Moldova.

Wide front of the opposition

The opposition in Moldova is actually reasoning about removing the organization of Action and Solidarity from power. The Socialist organization of the Republic of Moldova, the Communist organization of the Republic of Moldova, the Republican organization in the Heart of Moldova (a group of erstwhile Gagauzia baskans of Irina Vlah), The future of Moldova (the leader of this organization is erstwhile Moldovan Prime Minister Vasile Tarlev) formed an electoral coalition of the Patriotic Election Block. Ion Ceban erstwhile politician of the Communist organization of the Republic of Moldova, the Socialist organization of the Republic of Moldova. In 2019 he won the election for the Chisinau mayor. In 2022 he founded the National alternate Movement. Ceban has since started to support EU integration on a healthy basis and at the same time opposed the organisation of liberal parades in Chisinau, which are an integral part of the collective anti-value of the West. Mer Chisinau obtained re-election in 2023. It is worth adding that in these elections the PSRM candidate for mera scored twice as much as the list for the Chisinau council, so it is possible to presume that Ceban made a controlled divided to scope another, unattainable for the PSRM group of voters. Ceban cooperates in the parliamentary elections with erstwhile candidate PSRM for president of Moldova Alexander Stoianoglo. The National alternate Movement supports Moldova's entry into the EU on a healthy basis, condemns peculiar Military Operations and wants to make cooperation with the Russian Federation. erstwhile Moldovan president and PSRM leader appealed to Ion Ceban for cooperation, a non-aggression pact in parliamentary elections.

Good and bad interference

Maia Sandu goes all the way, due to the fact that he does everything so that Ceban and his people do not have the slightest opposition to co-operation with pro-Russian and multi-vector forces. As a Romanian citizen, the president of Moldova took part in the fresh presidential elections in Romania. Sandu facilitated Moldovan citizens with a Romanian passport vote in the election for president of Romania. Most Moldovan citizens with a Romanian passport voted for Nicoșora Dana, a policy that has practically the same views as the president of Moldova. The president of Romania rapidly returned his thanks due to the fact that he gave Ion Ceban a ban on entering Romania for an alleged gathering with Călin Georgescu and George Simion (the gathering allegedly took place in Switzerland). As we can see, there are good and bad interferences in the election process.

The opposition can win.

The Action and Solidarity organization has any 30-40% of support in public opinion surveys. The political camp did not in any way advance a pro-EU group but was assertive towards the current government. As a result, the Mai Sandu camp has no coalition capacity (even the Renato Usasti group in the event of the electoral threshold being breached will not enter the coalition with the current authority, and in the event of information about a possible agreement between Sandu and Usati, the consequence may be that voters will pass their votes on to the Patriotic Electoral Block). Not allowing voters to vote for groups associated with Ilan Sór can give small effect (pro-Russian voters of these projects will vote for the Patriotic Electoral Block, and the electorate of revolt, protest will vote for any organization opposed to the presently ruling). The end of summertime and the beginning of autumn will be very interesting in Moldovan politics. Much can happen yet, but I am betting that alternatively the Action and Solidarity organization will lose power, although Maia Sandu and the Collective West will do everything to prevent this from happening.

Kamil Waćkowski