Officers from Żar received a study concerning the luggage left at the main station. The study indicated that a man had left his suitcase at the station, after which he rapidly left and boarded the train of the Żara – Legnica relationship. A police officer with pyrotechnic training was assigned to the site, who checked the baggage contents with a mobile device. Fortunately, there were only clothes inside. However, the Ukrainian was arrested due to the fact that he denied that he owned the suitcase.
A Ukrainian in his draft age left a suspicious suitcase at the station in Żary. Through this he led to halting train traffic and involving respective services, including explosives experts. Initial service message He did not point to any ‘second bottom’ of the matter, and as specified he could at most be surprised. Temporary arrest for forgetfulness? This would be a shocking and excessive action by the prosecutor and the court. It turned out, however, that the case has a second bottom and is more serious than initially thought.
A press spokesperson for the ferocious prosecutor's office, Ewa Antonowicz reported that the fishy was a Ukrainian without a permanent residence, whose behaviour caused legitimate concern. – The alleged act qualified under Article 224a §1 kk, namely that on 24 November 2025 in Żarach, knowing that the threat did not exist, created a situation designed to give emergence to a belief that specified a threat existed in specified a way that he left a suitcase in the interior of the railway station, and at the request of the safety officer disowned its earlier possession and drove off on a bus – She did.
This behaviour of “war refugees” has triggered an avalanche of police and railway workers, including the stopping of train traffic, the closing of the station for travellers and the checking of the suitcase with a speculum camera. At the same time, railroad safety officers captured a man in Legnica. He was brought to the police unit and then heard the charge of inciting unnecessary activities of the public utility institution and the safety authority.
The fishy failed to plead guilty to the alleged act and filed explanations in which he claimed the suitcase was not his. This further curious the officers, but due to the good conduct they did not uncover further details. The investigation is conducted by the territory Police office in Żara under the supervision of the territory Attorney's Office in Żara. For the act under Article 224a §1 kk, the Ukrainian is facing a punishment of up to 8 years imprisonment. It is unclear whether another charges will be filed. I want this to be a development.
