PAD's message on Russian spy Rubcov's file browsing (previously seen by the alleged free me(r)dia as an incorrigible writer and another victim of the Kaczystski regime) sparked the scream and tossing of the full liberal left.
KThe defensive argument utilized by PAD is the alleged ratification of the cooperation agreement between SKW and FSB by late Lech Kaczyński.
With a word ratification In a left-wing way, it sounds like Lech Kaczyński made the deal himself!
Meanwhile, the agreement actually ratified by the late president was typical international agreementand its content afraid the common protection of classified information. Russia has concluded specified agreements around 201 with all practically all countries of the world.
If individual is curious in its content, they can look into the diary of Laws (Journal of Laws of 2008 No. 217 item 1384).
What is different is the agreement concluded on 11 September 2013 by secret services – Polish SKW Russian FSB. As part of that, Poland undertook to "detecting, preventing and combating terrorist activities and diversion against armed forces” and “countering the intelligence and subversion activities of 3rd country peculiar services“ against Russia.
It is worth recalling that at that time there were already fighting in Ukraine, where Russia was not officially present, but the nationality of the celebrated "green men" was widely known.
The question is, to what degree was the above agreement implemented?
Should we have responded to the detection of intelligence activities directed at Russia by the services of another NATO countries? Or was it just adequate to... report?
As part of a kind of darming action taken after the publication of the above information (RESET), it was attempted to say that the "agreement" was intended to facilitate the withdrawal of Polish soldiers from Afghanistan. If that were true, Tusk proved to be a unique foresight. ;) As we remember, NATO troops left Afghanistan 8 years later, in 2021.
Another part of nonsense, published by liberal leftist people, concerns a Russian spy, and earlier “victims of the PiS regime”, a certain Pablo Gonzalez alias Paul Rubcov.
Well, he got access to classified documents, due to the fact that that's his law as a suspect.
As evidenced by Article 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, more or little shrewd liberal "laws".
Indeed. Article 321(1) of the NCP does not theoretically leave area for another interpretation.
If there are grounds for closing the investigation, at the request of the fishy or his lawyer for final familiarisation with the investigation materials, the investigator shall inform the fishy and the lawyer of the date of final familiarisation, instructing them of the right to prior review the file within a time limit appropriate to the gravity or complexity of the case, as determined by the procedural authority. In order to review the file, the prosecutor may make the file available electronically.
But the above mentioned provision does not warrant access to the full file.
The regulation is found a small earlier, in Article 156 §4 of the abovementioned Code.
Where there is simply a danger of disclosing classified information classified as ‘secret’ or ‘closely secret’, the examination of the file, the drawing up of copies and copies shall be carried out in accordance with the rigors specified by the president of the court or court. Authenticated copies and copies shall not appear unless otherwise provided for in the Act.
It's not the only control off. You can even cover up witness statements, but only during proceedings erstwhile temporary arrest is involved.
According to the Polish judgement Constitutional Court (K 42/07 of 3 June 2008) the request to guarantee that the suspect and his defender are full acquainted with the facts of the case at the phase of the judicial proceedings and let restrictions in this respect at the phase of the investigation.
The problem of confronting the transparency of criminal proceedings and the secrecy of certain information due to the safety of the State was besides reflected in the case law of the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
In the judgement of 16.02.2000 in the case Jasper v. United Kingdom, complaint No 27052/95 stressed that the right to request access to information on evidence collected is not absolute. The Court saw that in a criminal trial there may be a conflict of interests between the fishy (the defendant) and values specified as national security, the request to defend witnesses, the secrecy of detection methods utilized by the police.
The request to defend the rights of another entity or the request to defend an crucial public interest may so sometimes lead to a regulation of the right of the accused to access evidence. However, this must be treated as an exception and requires circumstantial mechanisms to warrant the right to a fair criminal trial.
Meanwhile Russian Champion he was acquainted with the files even though it was clear that there were talks about his exchange. As the Republic of Poland informs, Article 321 § 1 of the NCP has been informed of the full act, including classified 2 weeks before... the planned exchange!
Zfunny is the leading safety expert coalition 13 December any Piotr Niemczyk, erstwhile UOP Deputy Chief. 2 years ago, he mocked Polish services, which would lead to an global scandal by stopping a celebrated Spanish journalist. In a text published in GazWyb (or where else?) ABW superstar, which means arresting an alleged spy. Do Kamiński's services embarrass Poland? He even found the reason for the persecution of Rubcov alias Gonzalez:
This “Russian agent” in texts for the press and correspondence for tv regularly addresses human rights issues. In comments on Poland, he supported those active in helping refugees on the Polish-Belarusian border and was amazed by the phenomenon of Radio Maryja. His PhD work at the Faculty of Political Sciences and Administration of the University of the Basque Country is about persecution of the LGBT movement in Georgia.
BadPiS Apparently, he couldn't handle one. freedom and svabod borieca etc. Now, however, in Rzeczpospolita Niemczyk broadcasts differently.
Piotr Niemczyk, erstwhile Deputy Head of the UOP Intelligence Board, although he does not consider Rubcow to be a superspy, but admits that there is simply a hazard that the investigation file contains valuable information for Russian intelligence.
- I'm sorry. As long as Rubcow had intelligence communications and the Polish services would admit it, it would be valuable for the Russians to know how it happened. Second thing: if there were agents of Polish intelligence in his surroundings, their profiles would besides be crucial and interesting, even if their individual data are not straight available – points out Piotr Niemczyk.
]]>https://www.rp.pl/politics/art41073951-Russian-spy-with-secret-knowledge-with-...]]>
Not a word about the earlier enunciation of this "expert" who has... 4 years in UOP at the beginning of the 3rd Polish Republic. After a brief occupation at the Szczecin branch of Gazeta Wyborcza, he went to the UOP, where he became almost immediately head of the Bureau of Analysis, to yet become vice chief of the full agency. Finally, they were esbecs, utilizing the return of communist pragmatists to take anything from inexperienced children of toys and drive them home. It's almost a generation since these Augustine times.
Well, The Tusk government, unlike the PiS losers, consists of akin experts. ;)
But let's put the jokes aside. What Tusk's government is, everyone sees.
Let us think alternatively about why a Russian spy, said to be Colonel GRU, so not just 2 weeks before his release, was he familiarized with all the materials of criminal proceedings, including classified ones?
The explanation that the prosecutor investigating the planned action did not know anything about the planned action cannot withstand criticism.
He had to know Bodnar, and should therefore, in the supervision mode, prohibit any activity in the investigation until the situation has been resolved.
However, this was not done.
In a average country, even more so, in 1 that preaches the desire to return to normality, the Minister of Justice would resign after specified a scandal.
The Prime Minister would have accepted this without hesitation.
But in Poland, in Poland, rather, specified a number is impossible.
Bodnar is inactive useful; there are inactive environments that value him as a lawyer, a erstwhile RPO.
In the meantime, this man's ineptness is gushing.
Yeah, he's most likely gonna be out of office soon. However, the sine qua non condition is that Tusk's designation that leaving him as a minister-general harms him directly.
Then possibly Gierty?
But this 1 has a strong financial position to be the next to be thrown at the prey of an increasingly dissatisfied reptile. Besides, he's self-focused no worse than Tusk.
Of course, assuming that Coalition 13 December It will last until next year's presidential election.
However, looking at the pace at which he loses his support, this seems increasingly questionable.
9.09 2024
