Stories of net thugs of the longest Polish master of law (how much longer will she be a disgrace to the barrister, disciplinary spokeswoman of the Bar Association in Warsaw Anna Mika-Kozak??) about the “written cowards” fleeing from the harsh but right arm of tusko-Bodnarowska justice in a minute they will shamelessly vanish from social networks.
A All thanks to the RPO report, which simply showed the European courts a actual image of “rude justice” and the treatment of people through the “see” rule of the führer.
Let's remember.
Published “for Christmas” study Ombudsman Dr Marcin Więcka it clearly points to reprimand in the light of Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Conduct of alleged bodies towards suspects.
The RPO pointed out precisely the violations committed by the “bodnarists” in an effort to force evidence against the Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobrze.
And so to Father Michał Olszewski:
...
- The findings confirmed the merits of the plea of long-term conduct by ABW officers of procedural activities involving Fr. Michał O. – continuously for 15 hours, without providing him with the anticipation of rest, without providing food, with the continuous usage of handcuffs, even while in safe rooms, providing protection and under the supervision of interior safety Agency officers; strength of oppressive conditions authorises the uncovering that there has been inhumane treatment in this respect for the temporary arrest;
- The allegation of excessive preventive usage of direct coercive measures in the Warsaw-Służewiec detention centre was considered justified by the introduction of additional restrictions on the usage of handcuffs at each exit of the housing cell and another premises (e.g. dayrooms) – where no handcuffs were utilized for the time of delivery, to the dayroom and to the bathhouse in relation to all temporarily arrested; there were no grounds for specified warnings, as no circumstances indicated that Fr Michael O.'s attitude or behaviour posed a greater threat to the safety of the unit and the Prison Service officers than others temporarily arrested;
- the findings confirmed the validity of the allegation of excessive and unjustified means of direct coercion by police officers during the convoy of Fr. Michał O. on procedural activities, when, in addition to handcuffs, leg handcuffs were used; the application of this measurement was incompatible with the principles of necessity, minimisation of ailments and proportionality to the degree of danger;
- a violation of the right to usage sanitary facilities in a residential cell by placing Fr. Michał O. in a residential cell where the sanitary corner was not shielded in specified a way as to make it impossible to see the settled during activities requiring intimacy by persons entering the cell;
- a failure to comply with the medical inspection advice erstwhile a month, formulated in connection with the provision of peculiar protection;
- a breach has been found in the form of deficiencies in the conduct of the file (with respect to the deficiency of adequate justification for the decisions taken, the inclusion in those decisions of unclear, imprecise wording, recalling an outdated legal basis);
- a breach in the form of a non-equipment of the transitional cell in which he was temporarily arrested was found with an electrical kettle;
- has been found to be a breach in the form of a long wait temporarily arrested for dietary nutrition.
On the another hand, against 2 b. officials of the Ministry of Justice, the RPO found the following allegations to be valid:
- In connection with the conduct by ABW officers of proceedings involving Karolina K. for 18 hours, without providing it with a full-value meal, there was an improper treatment of the detainee; Whereas the findings made indicate that the rule of humanitarianism, expressed in Article 41(4) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland and Article 4(1) of the Implementing Code, has been maintained; whereas affirmative measures have been taken to meet the minimum needs of the detainee, e.g. for the means at its disposal, to buy a warm drink and to let the acquisition of food products; whereas, more importantly, the direct coercion measures (the handcuffs) have been applied rationally, in accordance with the rules laid down in the legislation, and have been waived from their usage in the absence of danger;
- Whereas the findings confirmed the validity of the allegation of excessive and unjustified means of direct coercion by police officers during the convoy from the Criminal Arrest to the National Prosecutor's Office of Karolina K. for procedural activities when, in addition to handcuffs placed on their hands, leg handcuffs were used; Whereas the application of this measurement was found to be incompatible with the principles of necessity, minimisation of ailments and proportionality to the degree of danger;
- there has been a breach of the right of contact with the defender in connection with the three-week detention by an authority holding correspondence from a defender to a temporarily arrested;
- findings confirmed that the preventive check at the PdOZ was twice carried out against a man detained by an officer, contrary to the provisions in force which order the same sex to be carried out;
- Whereas the allegation of unlawful entry of Karolina K. in an isolation cell was found to be reasonable, since a applicable decision was not given by the manager of the Arrest, The Prison Service had no legal basis for specified a temporary arrest;
- a breach of the right to appropriate surviving conditions in the housing cell has been found to be in so far as the inmate: due to the deficiency of lighting in the sanitary area, it could not freely usage the sanitary facilities, due to the deficiency of electricity in the plug-in socket, it could not usage the electrical kettle, due to the failure of the radio node talker has been exposed to multiple hours of nuisance;
- a breach was found by not giving to the housing cell objects of spiritual worship sent in the package;
- a breach has been found in the form of a long wait for the request for the results of the medical examination;
- a breach has been found in the form of deficiencies in the conduct of the file (no adequate justification for the decisions taken, inclusion of unclear, vague wordings in those decisions).
According to the babbling speeches of Bodnar himself, as well as various legal gurus of the current power (among others Sadurski, called professor, or prof. of doctoral work Bodnar Mirosław Wyrzykowski, a lecturer at the officer's school... SB!) the above concrete infringements of the applicable law are irrelevant because... they are not!
Even if they are, they do not infringe Article 3 of the Convention.
Meanwhile, an expanding avalanche of scandals and scandals, which are erupting all minute due to the utmost desire to "compromise on 13 December" (video: the communists were already the Minister of discipline and Higher Education. Darius Wieczorek, unfortunately he is not the only one) tries to cover up the alleged scandals of the erstwhile power.
In that, of course, ore governor and his squad can number on Polish-language me(r)dia and even help... so far rightly and not without reason associated with Kremlin portals and portals, supposedly “Polish and right”!
In the long run, however, the effects, which in no way can be obscured by even the most vicious translation of Red or by Cuchnowski, etc.
CThe European Arrest Warrant (ENA) has been sent for the fact in favour of associate Marcin Romanowski, which, as is known, should have certain consequences.
Well, according to the alleged Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13.6.2002 on the European Arrest Warrant (ENA) and surrender procedures between associate States the implementation of the ENA is simply a rule and the refusal to execute is provided for as an exception which must be interpreted strictly. However, in accordance with Article 3 (1) to (3) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, mandatory grounds for refusal include:
1. the inclusion of the offence underlying ENA, amnesty in the executing State;
2) the rule of ne bis in idem;
3) failure to comply with the age-limit requirement.
As you can see, no of these reasons apply to the associate in question. It is besides not affected by the alleged optional grounds which the extradition court may but request not take into account.
However, Bodnar's dream spends his imagination of Hungary's mention to Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
And this leaves no doubt. In accordance with Article 19(2):
No 1 may be removed from the territory of a State, expelled or issued by extradition to a State where there is simply a serious hazard that he may be subjected to the death penalty, torture or another inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Contrary to the first words of Dr Więcka's "report", violations of Article 3 of the European Convention have been found, which fulfils the hypothesis of Article 19 of the NRP!
Thus, the refusal to issue Mr Romanowski has a deep factual justification not only based on evidence from the associate or another inmates, but on the published constitutional study of the Polish Body!!!
PLet us besides remember another case that spends sleep with Bodnar and his hawk, anchored in the National Prosecutor's Office.
Tusk authoritative He got angry. to Hungary for granting political asylum to Marcin Romanowski. And since Christmas, he has heard that it will prove to be as effective in this substance as in the implementation of the announced "concrete"
However, everything indicates that he will gotta in February Get angry. large Britain.
Well, on 17-19 February 2025 in London (not to be confused with Land, etc.) there is to be an extradition case. Michał Kuczmierowski.
Although the Charter of Fundamental Rights does not apply in the UK after a brexit, the ban on extradition to a country where fundamental human rights are violated besides results from another acts of global law.
Mr Kuczmierowski's arrest warrant was based on Article 599 TRADE AND COOPERATION AGREEMENTS between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the 1 part, and the United Kingdom of large Britain and Northern Ireland, of the another part.
The exception to the work to execute an order originating in an EU country provides for Article 601 of the abovementioned Act:
1. The execution of an arrest warrant may be refused:
...
(h) if there are nonsubjective grounds to believe that an arrest warrant has been issued for the intent of carrying out proceedings or executing a punishment against a individual on grounds of sex, race, religion, cultural origin, nationality, language, political views or sexual orientation, or that his or her situation may be prejudiced for any of these reasons;
(...).
ZInstead of "restoreing the regulation of law" we so have the compromise of "liberal" Poland this time in the global dimension.
I wonder if Ursula von der Leyen has already called Tusk, or if he is about to make specified a call:
- Donald, he's got Tole! All you had to do was put out the Polish economy and destruct the mean PiS, not make yourself a European idiot!
I that would be as much as the unrepentant Prof. Jan Tadeusz Stanisławski said.
7.01 2025
