When the 3rd Way comes about making employees happy, 1 can presume in advance that it is to make their lives difficult. After all, a group whose 1 of the flagship electoral slogans was to reconstruct the membership of entrepreneurs cannot come up with anything meaningful in the economy. That wouldn't stick.
The latest thought of a city-people centreright is to remove the right to free Sundays for retail workers. They're expected to feel better about it, and they're expected to want it. It can be assumed that investigation has been conducted among self-employed specialists and members of Poland 2050, who worked for a while in the trade in college and now feel entitled to speak.
The full communicative of opponents limiting trade on Sunday is simply a festival of manipulating moments so apparent that their authors laughed erstwhile they invented them. After all, even Richard Petru cannot be so detached as to believe in them. Let's look at the most interesting of them.
To begin with, it is worth taking the "analysis" of price differences by Mr Petru into account. Well, the economist Convincingthat due to the regulation of trade on Sunday Poles pay for their purchases of horrendous amounts. The alleged standard buying basket in the most popular discount networks is within the scope of PLN 310-390. However, erstwhile individual wants to store on Sunday, they must go to the most popular franchise of residential stores, where they will pay PLN 556. In this way, the regulation of trade on Sundays would take about 150 PLN to households all week.
By the way, Petru discovered that the Frog was more costly than the Ladybug. However, the overwhelming majority of Poles and Poles discovered this long ago. Even children know that, at least the more independent ones. Therefore, no 1 leaves 5 100 in the Frog. If individual goes there, they're going for a part of money they just ran out of. I don't hide that I sometimes walk myself, and in front of me are usually the guys with a fewer beers. You gotta fall on your head to do weekly buying in the Frog – or to be Richard Petru.
Another very interesting argument is that the regulation on trade does not work due to the fact that most shops are open anyway. You might ask why you're so scorning him, but let's not play inexpensive rhetoric. Piotr Szumlewicz notedthat 60 percent of stores on Sunday usually work. The regulation of trade on Sunday, however, does not mean that shops do not operate, but that most workers have the right to free Sunday. If the shops were full automated, let them all work.
Data described via the 300-economy portal, 17% of employees in trade and services work on weekends. This is about 3 times more than in almost all another industries, outside agriculture. No wonder there are restaurants, cinemas, and another leisure activities on Sundays. However, this means that 83% of employees in trade and services do not work.
The percent of employees working on weekends is the 3rd lowest in Europe in Poland – only lower in Norway and Lithuania. The EU average is 49%. So it is hard to say that the bill does not fulfil its task – on the contrary, it does it very well. It is clear that Sundays cannot be provided for all. That doesn't mean you gotta take them all.
Discount workers execute a physically demanding and tiring work for small money. They are 1 of the weakest professional groups, so they should be protected by state regulations. Without them, the exploitation of trade would take on tremendous proportions. Specialists, usually self-employed, do not request to be protected, due to the fact that they can manage themselves – not accidentally only 4% of them work on weekends.
In general, convincing that the liberalisation of Sunday trade is truly in the interests of workers is an highly insolent play. Greatly placed people who have so much in common with the trade that they go buying – and any seem not even to do so – talk on behalf of sellers and cashiers. Problem is, the second have a very different opinion.
"Leave Sundays in holy peace, leave us these Sundays, for we have earned them, working hard." She said on radio RMF trade unionist and cashier Jolanta Żołnierczyk. Traders double their wage on Sunday will rise the full wage to a minimum, but for this they will take distant the chance to spend at least 1 day of the weekend with their household or friends. beautiful bad business.
Another argument of supporters of trade liberalisation is allegedly in defence of owners of tiny stores. Richard Petru in the Parliamentary Speech indicatedthat since 2015 the number of discounts has increased from 3.6 1000 to 5.4 thousand. During this time, 30,000 smaller retail outlets were closed, which is to prove that the real intent of the regulation was to destruct Polish trade.
Anyone with a head in his place should ask, however, how would closing the discount on Sunday, allowing at the same time any tiny stores, aid the erstwhile and harm the latter? What's the logic behind this? Indeed, the closure of large retail outlets on the last day of the week did not halt the expansion of discounts at the expense of tiny settlement points. Without this limitation, however, tiny facilities would be even harder. On Sundays they can trade without feeling the breath of their large competition.
The expansion of discounts was already moving rapidly before the introduction of the trade restriction. simply this format stores that provides low prices, a wide scope of goods and advanced availability of facilities, went to the taste of Polish and Polish consumers Best. And it's hard to be surprised, they're just very convenient and inexpensive stores. Only hypermarkets can compete with them, frequently even cheaper, but usually you gotta go to them. Almost no 1 makes weekly purchases in tiny stores anymore – the closure of large facilities on Sunday provides them with at least 1 day with higher earnings.
In fact, the shopkeepers have already spoken on this matter. Polish Chamber of Commerce, which brings together the owners of tiny shops, She objected liberalisation of Sunday trade, as it would service to further grow discounts and deepen the trend of closing down smaller establishments. And who supports specified a solution? Of course. Polish Council of Commercial Centres, or galleries and the biggest retailers. It cites the projected increase in consumption and higher GDP, a typical liberal argument.
The trade liberalisation task is so 1 large fraud. Its authors claim to defend those who lose on it, but lie against the expansion of those who gain from it. There is no uncertainty that these others lobby powerfully at the authors of the project. There are also large business groups in line for money – developers waiting for Credit 0 percent and large capital intended to privatising state-owned companies.
When the 3rd Way comes about making employees happy, 1 can presume in advance that it is to make their lives difficult. After all, a group whose 1 of the flagship electoral slogans was to reconstruct the membership of entrepreneurs cannot come up with anything meaningful in the economy. That wouldn't stick.
The latest thought of a city-people centreright is to remove the right to free Sundays for retail workers. They're expected to feel better about it, and they're expected to want it. It can be assumed that investigation has been conducted among self-employed specialists and members of Poland 2050, who worked for a while in the trade in college and now feel entitled to speak.
The full communicative of opponents limiting trade on Sunday is simply a festival of manipulating moments so apparent that their authors laughed erstwhile they invented them. After all, even Richard Petru cannot be so detached as to believe in them. Let's look at the most interesting of them.
To begin with, it is worth taking the "analysis" of price differences by Mr Petru into account. Well, the economist Convincingthat due to the regulation of trade on Sunday Poles pay for their purchases of horrendous amounts. The alleged standard buying basket in the most popular discount networks is within the scope of PLN 310-390. However, erstwhile individual wants to store on Sunday, they must go to the most popular franchise of residential stores, where they will pay PLN 556. In this way, the regulation of trade on Sundays would take about 150 PLN to households all week.
By the way, Petru discovered that the Frog was more costly than the Ladybug. However, the overwhelming majority of Poles and Poles discovered this long ago. Even children know that, at least the more independent ones. Therefore, no 1 leaves 5 100 in the Frog. If individual goes there, they're going for a part of money they just ran out of. I don't hide that I sometimes walk myself, and in front of me are usually the guys with a fewer beers. You gotta fall on your head to do weekly buying in the Frog – or to be Richard Petru.
Another very interesting argument is that the regulation on trade does not work due to the fact that most shops are open anyway. You might ask why you're so scorning him, but let's not play inexpensive rhetoric. Piotr Szumlewicz notedthat 60 percent of stores on Sunday usually work. The regulation of trade on Sunday, however, does not mean that shops do not operate, but that most workers have the right to free Sunday. If the shops were full automated, let them all work.
Data described via the 300-economy portal, 17% of employees in trade and services work on weekends. This is about 3 times more than in almost all another industries, outside agriculture. No wonder there are restaurants, cinemas, and another leisure activities on Sundays. However, this means that 83% of employees in trade and services do not work.
The percent of employees working on weekends is the 3rd lowest in Europe in Poland – only lower in Norway and Lithuania. The EU average is 49%. So it is hard to say that the bill does not fulfil its task – on the contrary, it does it very well. It is clear that Sundays cannot be provided for all. That doesn't mean you gotta take them all.
Discount workers execute a physically demanding and tiring work for small money. They are 1 of the weakest professional groups, so they should be protected by state regulations. Without them, the exploitation of trade would take on tremendous proportions. Specialists, usually self-employed, do not request to be protected, due to the fact that they can manage themselves – not accidentally only 4% of them work on weekends.
In general, convincing that the liberalisation of Sunday trade is truly in the interests of workers is an highly insolent play. Greatly placed people who have so much in common with the trade that they go buying – and any seem not even to do so – talk on behalf of sellers and cashiers. Problem is, the second have a very different opinion.
"Leave Sundays in holy peace, leave us these Sundays, for we have earned them, working hard." She said on radio RMF trade unionist and cashier Jolanta Żołnierczyk. Traders double their wage on Sunday will rise the full wage to a minimum, but for this they will take distant the chance to spend at least 1 day of the weekend with their household or friends. beautiful bad business.
Another argument of supporters of trade liberalisation is allegedly in defence of owners of tiny stores. Richard Petru in the Parliamentary Speech indicatedthat since 2015 the number of discounts has increased from 3.6 1000 to 5.4 thousand. During this time, 30,000 smaller retail outlets were closed, which is to prove that the real intent of the regulation was to destruct Polish trade.
Anyone with a head in his place should ask, however, how would closing the discount on Sunday, allowing at the same time any tiny stores, aid the erstwhile and harm the latter? What's the logic behind this? Indeed, the closure of large retail outlets on the last day of the week did not halt the expansion of discounts at the expense of tiny settlement points. Without this limitation, however, tiny facilities would be even harder. On Sundays they can trade without feeling the breath of their large competition.
The expansion of discounts was already moving rapidly before the introduction of the trade restriction. simply this format stores that provides low prices, a wide scope of goods and advanced availability of facilities, went to the taste of Polish and Polish consumers Best. And it's hard to be surprised, they're just very convenient and inexpensive stores. Only hypermarkets can compete with them, frequently even cheaper, but usually you gotta go to them. Almost no 1 makes weekly purchases in tiny stores anymore – the closure of large facilities on Sunday provides them with at least 1 day with higher earnings.
In fact, the shopkeepers have already spoken on this matter. Polish Chamber of Commerce, which brings together the owners of tiny shops, She objected liberalisation of Sunday trade, as it would service to further grow discounts and deepen the trend of closing down smaller establishments. And who supports specified a solution? Of course. Polish Council of Commercial Centres, or galleries and the biggest retailers. It cites the projected increase in consumption and higher GDP, a typical liberal argument.
The trade liberalisation task is so 1 large fraud. Its authors claim to defend those who lose on it, but lie against the expansion of those who gain from it. There is no uncertainty that these others lobby powerfully at the authors of the project. There are also large business groups in line for money – developers waiting for Credit 0 percent and large capital intended to privatising state-owned companies.
