The first association that comes to head after what he presented Adam Bodnar before the full composition of the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, is simply a known mention to the cognition of the student of the first year of law. A lawyer with a doctoral degree should have a law base in 1 finger and that is precisely what students learn in the first year of law. Adam Bodnar would not pass the colloquium, which would rise questions: What are the sources of law in Poland? What is the jurisdiction of a court? What do you mean, a full court ruling? Who is the organization to the proceedings?
Adam Bodnar gave an incorrect answer to each of these questions and could not receive any another assessment than insufficient. Moreover, not even a freshman, but a advanced school student preparing for a WOS graduation must know that the sources of law are: constitution, laws, ratified global agreements and regulations. Under no circumstances and contrary to popular belief, the origin of the law is neither courts nor judicial decisions. Adam Bodnar did not master this simple cognition and, therefore, in questioning the position of the SN House, as well as the judges themselves, relied on the rulings of the TEU and EPTC. Incidentally, no of these tribunals have always ruled that this home of SN and its judges do not exist, like nonstop, for purely political reasons, assert the ruling, media-friendly part of the legal environment.
The substantive jurisdiction of the court is the statutory competence of the individual courts, which may admit a circumstantial case, for example the territory Court cannot recognise a suit for a violation of goods, due to the fact that the civilian Code clearly states that it is the competence of the territory Court. However, if the territory Court had given a ruling in specified a case, it would have been repealed by law. Equally crucial is the appropriate filling of the bench, and here is simply a good example of the heaviest criminal cases concerning killings in which the court must appear in a 3 or five-member lineup. likewise and according to the origin of the law, the Constitution and the Act, nullity of elections is stated by the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs.
Meanwhile, Adam Bodnar, as a doctor of law, Minister of Justice and lawyer General, requested that the case be recognised by a completely different Chamber and, in addition, demanded the exclusion of all judges, which would mean that the law concerning the jurisdiction of the local court and the ruling's composition was broken. In fact, Adam Bodnar made an application, considering himself a organization to the proceedings, to find the validity of the election of Karol Nawrocki as president of the Republic of Poland, which, by definition, is completely absurd, due to the fact that as president Krzysztof Wiak explained, specified meetings are strictly systemic, in contrast to the election protests. The minister didn't know it either, and he got zero again.
In addition to the strictly legal dimension of embarrassment, there is besides a political dimension where Adam Bodnar took an equally painful lesson. In addition to the Citizens' Coalition, all parties, including 3 members of the ruling coalition, consider the election results important. Despite the force exerted, Szymon Hołownia has already announced that on August 6th he will convene the National Assembly and receive an oath from the president of Poland Karol Nawrocki. The cherry on the cake was besides laid by the Batory Foundation, known for criticism of the Law and the full right, which stated that there was no talk of the election for president being rigged. At the moment, only Donald Tusk has bigger problems with his own image than Adam Bodnar, and possibly for this reason, the Prime Minister will want to divert attention from himself, resigning a minister who collects critical assessments everywhere.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
