Tucker Carlson hosts regularly known personalities who, contrary to the mainstream, prove that another directions and trends in abroad policy are possible, the reality looks different from propaganda, which for 3 years unilaterally presented the conflict in Ukraine in an effort to prove the diagnosis of retired generals from Poland claiming that Russia is about to lose. besides on the issue of arms supply, it reveals the uncomfortable fact contrary to the notions of noble authorities and officers of Ukraine, who usage all equipment only to fight the Russian invader without at all profit. In the end, he completely reverses the statistic that took into account for a long time the victims and the losses in the equipment only on the Russian side, as any may have caused the impression that only “orca” were killed on the front, and on the Ukrainian side only civilians who had been raped before by drunk soldiers from Russia were killed, and the only victims of the Ukrainian troops were soldiers from the “Snake Island” who yet turned out to be all right and healthy.
Where does the weapons from Ukraine go?
Former U.S. Army colonel deals with myths about arms supply to Ukraine and confirms in an interview what Tucker Carlson says in the grove of Tucker Carlson that a large condition of the weapons goes to global arms markets, which gets into the hands of the worst people in the planet and destabilizes the world. Worse than that, an American writer claimed that no American agency tried to track where this weapon went, as if abruptly there were these agencies deaf and blind, which bad evidence of American service, or it was intentional. Plus, in his opinion, the CIA lied. Douglas MacGregor replied to him that the CIA was a black gap that he didn't know was coming in or out of. Everything but that it has destructive abilities, due to the fact that wherever it works it ends in subversion, revolution, decay. Therefore, he praised the abolition of the USID subsidy. It was the USAID and the National Fund for Democracy that helped finance all this nonsense.
Insecure CIA
MacGregor himself is not certain of the fresh CIA chief Ratcliffe due to the fact that he does not know what his orders are, and in this service in his opinion they have a serious problem due to the fact that everything works in isolation, without any work or supervision. So the full service must, in MacGregor's opinion, be divided into parts so that you can find out what is going on. You gotta halt a lot worse than what happened in Epstein's case. All of this should show that Americans are serious if they act by clearing the CIA of its deposits. He claims that America does not want any fresh conflicts, wars in another countries, and the installation of puppet governments. But in his opinion, it should be stopped to not be conflicted with a large part of the world.
National safety at the expense of a change of power
The interviewer Carlson says that we will be no longer the top. MacGregor said it would be, but let's have a look at America, is anyone willing to take all the equipment and go to Ukraine? And he says he has no interest in going to the another side of the planet to fight in that country. He points out that, as he said, "a closer body shirt" people are curious in a threat to the Mexican border, which is simply a real existential threat to the US. And that's why he thinks that neither China nor Russia nor Iran are a real threat. He warns against drug cartels in Mexico due to the fact that the president of Mexico de facto does not regulation it. His boy in Mexico said that moving skillfully in the maze of cartel connections allows him to survive, but standing in their way can origin him to be dead. Cartels take over the functions of the state, specified as wellness care.
Effects of Ukraine's arms in Mexico
MacGregor tells amazed Carlson that just outside Mexico, you can see a weapon on a hill that was originally expected to hit Ukraine, including Javelina. As you can see, aggression with another countries has 2 sides, due to the fact that you can have problems with weapons that you give to others. In his opinion, 50% of the weapons that were sent to Ukraine did not scope where it should have reached. Further support for Ukraine may end badly so Ukraine should be cut off from weapons and cash. And the Ukrainians themselves are sick of war and for a reason.
Scary statistics
As estimated by MacGregor, Russia lost between 90 and 100,000 soldiers, and an additional 10–20,000 non-Russians from the military establishment, however, all of this caused the unification of Muslim Turks who could fight. Even if the Chechens themselves are now clearing Kursk, as the Ukrainians dropped a large amount of drones on Chechnya, which was a immense mistake. due to the fact that they are not worth messing with, and there is simply a very good relation between them and Orthodox Christians. However, shocked Carlson says that the killed Ukrainians are according to confirmed sources of 1.2 million killed. The worst part is that these losses have increased recently. And this data confirms Larry Johnson and Scott Ritter. There are besides 2 million Ukrainians in Russia and 15 million in the West. And many of them aren't going back. But that's what happens at the end of wars. And if the Ukrainians are retreating unprotected, the consequence could be killing them in large numbers by the Russians. But he commends for the courage both of them and of others, but it is the Ukrainians who have no chance in war, nor to rebuild anything in their destroyed country. He besides responds to those malcontents who complain in Poland too, that Russia is moving so slowly, due to the fact that what is surely unbeliefable for many Putin does not want to kill Orthodox, Christian Slavs. This is collateral harm or a bonus for the West to destruct Russia. As you can see, MacGregor is expected to build a affirmative communicative about the end of the war in Ukraine, although there is inactive a long fight ahead, an intensification erstwhile it comes to bearing more victims on both sides and most likely specified interviews legitimizing the anti-war approach will be a lot more.
Bartłomiej Doborzyński (Polish thought Club – Gdańsk)
