From personalities specified as Editor Łukasz Warzecha, left-wing writer Rafał Otoka-Frąckiewicz or Marcin Palade we will learn nothing about Russia. They won't say anything about Russian threats. For example, on the occasion of the expected truce, they do not talk of sanctions. That they will be abolished and a stream of modern military technology will flow to Russia, and from Russia a stream of oil and gas for which it will fund itself a further invasion. That after the truce, they're just gonna give us a beating. Germany's dependence on Russian natural materials and Chinese components, which push Germany into its arms. Nope. Only about Ukraine that is simply a problem and Ukrainians. That I'd come to the veterans, that the surgery, that it was that shoo. Will the truce make our situation worse? Like it's bad now and it's worse?
On the another hand, Stretegy & Futore with Marek Budzisz and Dr. Bartosiak underestimate the comprodor character of the current regime, which pursues the interests of Germany and Russia as well. Bartosiak made an appeal today, unsensical. How can Tusk accomplish something there or something like how it must block the CPK, shipping on the Oder, ports, atomic power plants, etc.? After all, I justice the activities of this Fiuchler most positively.
If we're talking about the PiS, there's so much to comment on, I'll most likely forget half the thing, and I'll gotta make 1 more note:
The most crucial issue is the modus operandi itself, which is the mode of action, which was mentioned in the erstwhile note: moral uplifting, desticking, etc. as described by the aforementioned Sadkowski. Identifying your own interest with universal justice, not negotiating, etc. That's never gonna work in any case, and it's always gonna fail.
They have any intellectual opposition to the Polish benefit. If you tell them that Poland should benefit from this war, it is not – we have a failure to bear, endure for millions and let ourselves slip.
No average state admits anything if it doesn't have to. That's why I don't blame the Ukrainians here for Volyn, Bandera, etc. As the PiS wanted an exhumation, it should negociate erstwhile the position was strongest. Tough and Crab Tanks usage as an argument. They should request the receipt of supplies. For the Ukrainians to announce our leading function loud and clear. Yes, we want to fight the russian effectively, but Ukrainians should, too. And if they want to be without the tough guys, they don't care that much? By getting the Ukrainians in the ass, they made them say we'd inactive do what the Americans told us to do. And they didn't gotta deal with the sin.
In our case, the writers were incapable to break the opposition of the blocking lobby. It's not that easy to break, the only way is to kick everyone out and then take a few. I am talking about a lobby blocking the modernization of the army: it was not possible to acquisition anti-Russian weapons from us, which I have written about many times. To take out Krab, for example Komorowski kicked out Sheremietev. This Sheremietiev in turn is seriously peeled off, tells specified stories about II of the Republic that the head is small. What can you do about it? In any case, nothing could be dangerous for Russia but F 16 without bombs. The F 16 had already passed due to the fact that there was no another advice, due to NATO's obligations.
The block's methods were varied: unrealistic requirements, missionaryity, any Anders, a lobby of individual abroad producers blocked tenders, cost cuts (Gawron irp corvette). all guy who talks about the requirements of the modern battlefield and their fulfilment has compromised and should be cut off from everything. Especially erstwhile disposing of T-72 and T-55 tank equipment. In the event of war, all this is useful, as you can see in Ukraine. I've had so much company. Their line was that it was obsolete, as they were pushed to the post, that we were not threatened by the war, that the Russian were our squad and companions of joint training under the Warsaw Pact. That only missions endanger us.
Anyway, PiS couldn't get the merchandise out of the way, but he decided to go around it, which is simply a giant plus. The downside is not justifying the rationality of individual purchases. Especially quantitative issues, is all this real? With totals, specified a discussion is not intended, due to the fact that they gibberish with many years of experience in keeping Poland completely susceptible to Russia. The failure of the Fiuser Bartosiak's tail had the thought of not creating fresh units, but strengthening existing ones.
The concept of deterrence is, however, fatal: that fresh weapons are intended to deter Bolsheviks. due to the fact that if she can't be deterred, there's gonna be a fumble. The concept of deterrence causes us to buy what we see and what we don't see to buy. And what you can't see is what's needed to wage war. You don't request a scare due to the fact that you can't see.
Next: 300,000 armies are unrealistic and this postulate is weak. They started reinventing plumbers, etc., civilian service, to make it right. We don't have that many people here. The territorial defence is great, due to the fact that it is simply a strict anti-tosian formation, which aroused full rage.
I remind you that if the task is unrealistic and you gotta cut due to the fact that there's no money, then we can spend quite a few money and get nothing. Or very little. For example, the screws were made, but the nuts were not enough. Or that we have planes, but we don't have airports and rockets for them. Itp. This is where studies on Riga-Smith supply valuable guidance. specified investigation of mitomania and intensification I conducted and presented conclusions. Doctrine of Ray's coffer.
I besides remind you that my plan was to offer: 10 years of arms and then we go to the end, to the exhausted Russia?
And as Błaszczak declared that we were protected, he gave himself up to the Russians. due to the fact that the anti-aircraft defence is holed, there's always been a breach, like smuggling people or cigarettes. And at any moment, the Russians may launch a rocket that will scope Bydgoszcz.
We inactive have here the notion of abroad policy as loudly saying what we want and what we do not want. No circumstantial action. About this 1 day I will make an entry, Why Orban becomes more and more crucial and we do not realize that our business is not entirely coincident with the interests of Ukraine, the USA (with the interests of Germany being incompatuous at all), and the Law and Justice Department in general refused to formulate it. They could usage a fight with Warzechy or Otokki, and they can only challenge from onuc. erstwhile I look at Sakiewicz, I feel sorry for him.
I don't compose about totals here due to the fact that they're independent. On the occasion of abroad activities (Germany) will compose about them. I'll give you any links or I won't.
In all discussion on tv there should be a voice that Putin will not as usual keep up and Trump will say: I wanted to, and you see what happened. Now, I don't want to, but I gotta deliver 20,000 maneuvering missiles to Ukraine, which she will launch with a volley that will wipe out all bridges, warehouses, Moscow supplies. Is that gonna happen? I don't think so. But that's something to be reckoned with.
Bartosiak's call:
