Sodomy is disorderly and dangerous to health

magnapolonia.org 3 days ago

People active in pro-life activities frequently mention that erstwhile abortion supporters learn the technological basis for abortion and the course of its application, they frequently start opposing it. They decision from abortion supporters to her ardent opponents and public support of life. As it turns out, so should sodomy.

Sodomy is disorderly and dangerous to health. So says the scientist. Robert L. Kinney. This man holds the Ph.D. of Purdue University Pharmacy and Master of doctrine degree with specialization in the bioethics of the University of Steubenville. His publications on the subject were published in quarterly by The Linacre Quarterly , National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly , on the website Crisismagazine.com and in Homiletic and Pastoral Review.

According to the scientist, like abortion, alleged homosexuality was mistakenly considered a average variation of human activity. Many more people could argue homosexuality and alleged "sex marriage" if they were taught something strict – specifically anatomy and physiology. However, learning about homosexuality is hard both to teach and to adopt due to its grotesqueness. Many people most likely don't want to talk about discipline about any form of human sexuality, much little homosexuality.

Moreover, it seems that many people in today's society are avoiding a serious technological discussion on sodomy due to the fact that they know they are incorrect and refuse to admit it. Again, it reminds us of the abortion debate: killing a man in the womb is easy to prove, and after all, many simply do not want to admit the incorrect views of the past.

For the purposes of discussion and for the sake of clarity, consider the following questions that may arise on the anatomy and physiology test:

True or False: Human smooth muscles in the thick intestine are easy and inevitably damaged by force, besides repetitive.
Truth or False: The request for lesbians to wear men's prosthesis is natural.

Of course, both statements are true. And they are not considered controversial—until they are decently applied to homosexuality and alleged "single-sex marriages".

The technological fact is that sodomy harms the least man ‘open’ while heterosexual intercourse is usually healthy. Biological women have a strong and flexible prescription area that is self-cleaning and has another properties that supply a clean and average ratio.

Sodomy is by its nature "dirty" and literally. The reader may besides conduct his own research; strangely enough, if the investigator uses appropriate passwords, even Google’s artificial intelligence is mostly honest about the inherent impurity and imperfection of sodomy, although these words are not used. This happens again, partially due to the fact that the intestines and surrounding organs are not designed to cohabit; the intestines are delicate and prone to damage.

Another technological fact that does not request to be explained, but which is cited here for the purposes of this discussion, is that feces passing through the intestines are often, if not always, simply poisonous. It contains bacteria, parasites, and another organisms that origin disease, including viruses that easy origin infections as a consequence of sodomy rupture and damage. Therefore, true, ideologie-free discipline opposes sodomy and a life commitment to sodomy, known as ‘gay marriage’.

It should be remembered that sodomy defenders will usage slogans specified as: “both men and women quit sodomy, so that is normal”. According to Robert Kinney, it's besides a misconception. The fact that men, and possibly any women, practice sodomy does not necessarily mean that it is normal. Males and women give in to many of the same disturbed behaviours, which are inactive considered disturbed, regardless of whether both sexes engage in them.

Secondly, and it should be stressed, homosexual men who consider themselves to be women claim to be heterosexual. The mention from the homosexual support group, which is not supported but should be quoted here, is "a individual who changes sex from male to female and is only attracted to men usually identifies himself as a heterosexual woman". These “transgender” people and seemingly another men active in sodomy consider themselves heterosexual—which is not true.

In this context, online references, for example, say that "both men and women practice sodomy" may mention to "transsexual women" who are actually men and so homosexual.

American CDC makes available statistic on sexually transmitted diseases and sometimes distinguishes between ‘men having sex with men’ and heterosexual persons. The CDC reported, among others, statistic on groups liable for fresh HIV cases and stated that men having sex with men were liable for 67% of fresh HIV cases in 2022, while those who reported heterosexual contacts were liable for 22% of fresh HIV cases.

The estimated number of fresh HIV cases caused by homosexual men would most likely be much higher if alleged "transgenders" were required to include their actual sex in erstwhile information. All another statistic of sexually transmitted diseases based on heterosexuality or homosexuality may be false due to data falsification by persons deliberately confusing sex.

And now, as far as matrimony is concerned, do homosexuals and heterosexuals commit to an “equal” relationship? Of course not. Homosexuals (including transgenders) are sentenced to lifelong sodomy, which is necessarily harmful, while heterosexual intercourse is not.

Female "gay marriage" differs from male marriage, but can besides be considered flawed. Women's "gay marriage" includes an work to cultivate a pseudo-relationship between 2 women and a male prosthesis. Technically, it seems that specified activity is not a ‘relationship’ due to the fact that the act is performed by a male prosthesis alternatively than by a second female involved. The necessity of male prosthesis to intercourse, as suggested by the above technological question, indicates a medical flaw.

Therefore, women's homosexuality and/or "homosexual marriage" of women are inherently flawed or, as the Most Holy Roman Catholic Church correctly defines them, "objectively unordered".

Another point to item is the scientifically confirmed fact that both men and women experience a paraphilia. Paraphilia is fundamentally a sexual attraction to abnormal things – many different kinds of things. Homosexuality is believed to be just another paraphilia – conditioned, learned and habitual, abnormal sexual attraction. Scientists with homosexual tendencies began simply to falsely teach that homosexuality is normal. This has been the case since around 1970.

Many people, including those mentioned at the beginning of the article that wrongly support homosexuality, frequently belong to those who want to be respected after death. If humanity survives present evil and if anyone wants to be remembered as "normal," he will follow the Church's teaching on homosexuality. And if, for various reasons, he does not follow the teachings of the Church, he should at least follow a teaching that clearly opposes homosexuality and “gay marriage.”

It is worth mentioning that atheists frequently say that they trust only science. possibly it's time they trusted her with the sodomites, too.

We besides recommend: Poland has launched Article 4 of NATO. Are you certain the drones were Russian?

Read Entire Article