Europe has always remained a closed cultural and civilisational circle. She was inaccessible to those who were outside her. She was exclusive, not inclusive. Her contacts with the outside planet are a past of wars, expansion and struggles with another civilizations. This is not a question of ideology, but of historical facts. The only minute she let the outside forces dominate her brought her down in the form of annihilation of the Roman Empire. Europe reopened to the planet during the 20th century erstwhile the political left took over, establishing a strategy of liberal democracy. Modern ideas of “man” and “humanity” are modern concepts derived from the doctrine of Enlightenment. The ideology of globalism has made them its primal dogmas that contradict the uniqueness and eternal isolation of European civilization. The Geneva Convention, the notions of "azyl" and "refugees" – extended to all the nations of the planet – are the tools of liberal-left globalisation, which seeks to build a "world village", subject to 1 central authority. The policy of isolationism, the end of planet trade in its present form, the restoration of manufacture and jobs to the West, the concepts of "remigration" and the "Forts of Europe" of the Identitarian Movement, the stopping of all immigration from outside the continent, the establishment of closed cultural circles and the completion of internal, systemic counter-revolution – is the only recipe for Western endurance and the only way to truly defeat the ideology of globalism. Internationalism, openness, humanitarianism, liberalism and left-wingness are a death conviction passed on our culture. Seeing what is happening on the streets of Europe, over which the demoliberal states no longer control, bearing in head the warnings of Guillaume Faye, who warned against the coming cultural war, having the awareness of the ongoing demographic disaster, which is simply a death conviction given to the biological endurance of our civilization, and remembering the destiny of Ancient Rome, we must realise that she has struck the hr of final reckoning with the ideas that are liable for the state of crisis. It's a substance of life and death, endurance or extinction.He who accepts open borders, planet trade, moving western factories to Asia, who accepts mass immigration from all corners of the planet – stands on the same side as globalists, and his conflict with them is apparent. He does not want to change the paradigm, and the only thing he is fighting for is another form of the current globalisation process. Samuel Huntington must win over Francis Fukuyama, Joseph de Maistre over Wolter, and Julius Evola over Karl Popper.
Demographic issues are at the heart of any social and political change. They were in the course of past the biological origin of large conflicts, revolutions, expansions of cultures and civilizations. Nowadays, they are the main cause, seen throughout the Western world, of mass migration disasters from Asia and Africa. For decades we have been faced with a sharp increase in the population of these 2 continents, at the same time the extinction of the peoples of Europe, and on a wider scale, of the full Western civilization ellipse (US, Canada, Australia, fresh Zealand), and of Orthodox Russia. From a historical point of view, the process that took place at the end of Ancient Rome is being recreated: the progressive demographic disaster and the massive influx of abroad tribes in the process known at the time as the “Great Journey of the Peoples”. We live in times in which we see that historical processes are governed by cyclical laws, as Oswald Spengler described perfectly in his monumental work The Twilight of the West.
However, major demographic change and the resulting migrations are not an excuse for the actions of states, governments and institutions – they are the ones who hold in their hands measures to halt crises and they are the ones liable for combating threats. Ancient Rome at its end was besides weak institutionally, militarily and demographicly to halt the influx of hostile tribes. In fact, in fresh decades it has been almost exclusively composed of the barbarian element. The last large Romans: Aetius, Stylicho, Emperor Majorian – were Romanized barbarians. The West has not yet reached this critical point. What he does not have is appropriate leadership and political will, which are essential to take decisive steps. They are not there due to the fact that the strategy of liberal democracy has dominated the West for decades, and the following revolutionary movements have been ruled by the left, liberals, neo-marksists, globalists and supporters of humanitarian sentimentalism, professing the enlightened ideas of “humanity” and “man”. It is in these aspects that the answer to the question lies: where is the consent to mass migration from outside Europe and who is liable for it?
3 forces are to blame, which hold power over the West and Europe in the iron grip:
- Western liberal democracies – the strategy and values on which it is founded are the origin of the current crisis and the origin of political decisions,
- political left – the vast majority of the western political class are representatives of this current. It should besides include liberalism – the oldest historically political and social ideology, preceding both socialism and communism. Liberalism is the father of all revolutionary movements. At the same time, it is simply a left-wing doctrine, due to the fact that it is hostile to tradition, community, authority and religion, opposed to utmost individualism, materialism, money worship and the power of the people,
- modern economical model, ideology of capitalism and global corporations.
All these 3 aspects: the political system, its chief ideas, and global corporate business, penetrates the spirit of a extremist left-liberal worldview. The political left, in the form of liberal democrats and capitalists, is in charge of the West, and it is in full work for the socio-civilization disaster that is taking place before our eyes. Capitalism, which is the ideology of profit maximization, which brings reality only to the economical aspect, cannot be regarded as a right-wing idea, due to the fact that in itself it derives from anti-traditional liberalism and negates the meaning of fundamental values for the right-wing right-wing one: hierarchy, authority, tradition and religion. Moreover, whoever puts economical profit above cultural-social and spiritual principles, whoever brings it to the top of the hierarchy of his goals, has the mentality and intellect of a tiny urban merchant who walks side by side with Marxist proletariat – in fact, they are no different from him. There is only material for both.
In 1995, American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington published the book "The Crash of Civilization and a fresh form of planet Order", in which he presented, opposition to globalism, a imagination of the future of the world. In his opinion, the essence of the coming era will be a collision between separate civilization circles. Huntington's work was created in conjunction with Francis Fukuyama's work "End of past and Last Man" from 1992. Fukuyama there outlined the imagination of “the end of history”, which was to happen with the defeat of communism and the dominance of the globe by liberal democracy. This kind of strategy was considered the most perfect, historical culmination of human efforts. Fukuyama became the chief ideology of globalism, Huntington his realistic opponent. We presume that Huntington's thesis should become the starting point for political decisions and for further discussion on the future of the West. Moreover, they should be treated as the origin of the renewal and extremist transformation of our civilisational circle, and the worldview of Fukuyama and globalist elites should be considered a deadly threat to the endurance of our world.
POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF THE GLOBALISM BY opposition OF WEST AND MIGRATION
Mass liberal democracy, whose characteristic features are classless society and the universal right to vote, is from a historical point of view an experimentation unknown in human past to date, an aberration of normality. Even its most celebrated form, Athenian democracy, did not recognise political equality, did not negate the classiness of society and did not grant voting rights to all residents. The modern form of democracy corresponds, in fact, to the Marxist "dictature of the proletariat" – modern societies have leveled everyone at the level of rights, de facto bringing them to the level of proletarians, over whom the model of "the Almighty" is watching (as Ludwig von Mises rightly described). The dictatorship holds the quantity, the mass, most of which represent the all-powerful state apparatus. In practice, this ends with the fact that in the course of the elections, the mass elects the top demagogues and cyclicalists, who take over power, manipulate and exploit subordinate people. The elites understood as aristocracy disappeared. word derived from the combination of Greek words arisos‘best’ and plareo – ‘governments’. It means those who have intellectual, spiritual and moral superiority. The West has elites within the meaning of power groups, but does not have elites understood as a kind of man whose essence is superior intellect, while defending higher principles and ideas. Triumphed by the model of an "almighty state" with totalitarian features – the 20th century brought the eventual dominance of this form, in which the state power is almost absolute, limited only in method terms, and the state interferes in all aspects of social life: economy, private property, families, children, education. This “Leviathan” completely chokes the healthy social tissue and contributes, not only to reducing development, to Europe's extinction. Massive taxation, bureaucracy, demolition of patriarchy and matrimony and household institutions, systemic discrimination against men, domination of the feminist matriarchy—all the merits of democratic and liberal states over the past decades. This reality was perfectly described by José Ortega y Gasset in his 1929 canonical work "The Rebellion of the Mass":
"However, the fact that a mass man actually believes that he is the state, and is increasingly striving to destruct any creative minorities that hinder him under any pretext, including in all areas of life, politics, ideology, industry. The results of these efforts will prove fatal. Social vitality will be constantly broken by state intervention; it will not be able to germinate any fresh grain. Society will gotta live. for countries; man for government machinery. However, in the final account, the state is only a device whose existence and maintenance depend on the surviving living individuals around it. Thus, erstwhile he draws the last drop of blood from society, he will destruct himself; a dead skeleton will remain, the dead rusty death of machines, even more dead than the death of surviving organisms."
With democratisation, there was a revolution at the level of values, ideas and concepts. The chief features of Western demoliberalism are derived from the Enlightenment of the thought of “man”, his apparent “rights”, and “humanity”. In common, these are “bags”, to which all inhabitants of the Earth are thrown on the basis of expected equality derived from anthropological and biological sciences – belonging to a race homo sapiens. This is simply a position that was alien to pre-revolutionary Europe. Not for technological reasons, but cultural and ideological reasons. The historical standard within conventional civilizations was what is now referred to as "the tribal thinking". Individual cultures and civilizations saw reality in terms of “we” – “foreign”. This crucial discrimination he emphasized in his work on the doctrine of politics, Carl Schmitt, who recognized that the essence of political reasoning was the discrimination between “enemy” and “friend”. In his speech to the National Policy Institute in 2012, the prominent French thinker Guillaume Faye stressed that the planet outside Europe does not believe in the concept of "humanity", but believes in the Schmittian discrimination of enemy and friend. Why? due to the fact that it is not only a philosophical concept, but an expression of the ontological rule on which relations between diverse groups, cultures and civilizations are founded. This is the nature of the planet we live in. “Humanity” is simply a utopian ideal, not a concept describing reality. Similarly, in his last text published just before his death in 1936 (Is planet Peace Possible?), Oswald Spengler referred to another ideal, pacifism: “Pacifism will stay ideal, war a fact”. For a medieval European, “man” meant “Christian” – “Muslimman”, frequently referred to as “saracena” – was an alien. Reality was not seen in terms of “humanity”, which would include all the nations, groups and ethnicities surviving on Earth. Cultural aspects were superior to biological aspects – only modern and modern eras elevated what is physical and biological to the summit itself, degrading intellectual, spiritual and moral superiority. In his magnum opus “The Twilight of the West”, Spengler emphasized Plato's view of the concept of “humanity”: “When Plato speaks of humanity, he means Hellen in contrast to barbarians.” Dante Alighieri utilized the same word in the medieval treaty "Monarchy", but we cannot uncertainty that he understood it as a community of Christians in Europe, alternatively than all cultures, from all corners of the planet known at the time, including the followers of Islam. Even the " Declaration of Human Rights and Citizens" of 1789, the creation of the French Revolution, utilizing the terms "man" (l’homme) and "citoyen" (citoyen), in practice applied exclusively to men. Another example is the voting rights that were in force in the United States at the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries: they were only entitled to white men, an additional standard was the request to have property. The only form of limiting and diversifying abstract notions of “man” and “humanity” that survived at the political level in the West is the limitation of voting rights to adults over 18. The construct of "humanity" in the now adopted universalistic sense was born only in the Age of Enlightenment, and preceded by political and philosophical liberalism. Similarly, the concept of "tolerance". Tolerance in today's sense is the dogma of Wolter and French les philosophesNot a classic, conventional Europe. This French thinker was not a typical of European culture and civilization in its healthy form, but a godfather of its degeneration and decadence. Like the era he represented, which we now call "Enlightenment." It was as enlightened in its pathology as the works of 1 of its most crucial creators: Marquis de Sade. Among the chief ideologists who have contributed to the creation of a modern knowing of the concepts of “humanity” and “humanity” are John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Wolter, Denis Diderot, Immanuel Kant, Thomas Paine – anti-traditional and revolutionary thinkers. In the 19th century, Auguste Comte developed the concept of “the religion of mankind” ("Religion de l’Humanité"). The object of worship was to become “humanity”, replacing the Christian God. No 1 has expressed better awareness of the civilization period in which we live present than Comte in the above concept. Indeed, the modern West was mastered by the cult of “man”, his “rights” and “humanity”, which replaced theocentrism and exclusivity of European civilization. In the 20th century, there was a triumph of liberal democracy and philosophers like Karl Popper, author of the 1945 book: “Open society and its enemies”. The devoid of identity The West broke with tradition, became liberal, postmodern and blurry at the level of principles, resulting in “opening” to the full world. 1 of the results of this worldview is the current consent to mass immigration from all corners of the globe into our civilisation. The presentation of these conventional concepts is not intended to dehumanize. It simply proves that the primary feature of the pre-revolutionary planet was the belief that there was a hierarchy among people, that is, a natural and inherent differentiation between them, which necessarily implies different laws and obligations. Today's equal position leads to the conclusion thatIf there is “humanity”, then there are no more states, nations and civilizations, and everyone has the right to live anywhere in the planet – this inevitable and essential implication of this view.
It should be added that the political left proclaims the slogan of 'multiculturalism', which was allegedly intended to be an eternal characteristic of Europe. Of course, the coexistence of various nations and cultures is simply a feature of European civilization. They have always performed, but with 1 exception, which completely contradicts left-wing narrative: on our continent there were separate nations and cultures, but only within European civilization. In the past of Europe, there has never been "multiculturalism" for cultures and nations from all over the world, and surely not from Asia and Africa, due to the fact that it has been with these civilization circles for centuries that Europe has waged a Manichean war. The foundation of this thought is Homer’s “Iliad” describing the past of the Trojan War – clashes between Europe and Asia. This eternal war has been waged since the Greeks and their conflict with the Persians, a symbol of which remains the character Leonidas in the conflict of Thermopiles. It was continued by Alexander the Great, medieval Crusades, Spanish Reconquist, modern colonial empires, wars with the Ottoman Empire, until the fresh struggles of the British Empire in Africa, India, the mediate East and Afghanistan. It continues to this day, but has adopted a degenerate form of attempts to install a democratic strategy in the mediate East, which was a essential implication for taking over Western civilization by political left and capitalist forces. The fact that the conflict is eternal and will find the future of the West, he illustrated in 1933, in his last book entitled “The summertime of Decision”, already mentioned by Oswald Spengler, announcing the upcoming clash between the European planet and the remainder of the globe.
The enlightened ideas of "humanity" and "man" triumphed with the increasing influence of the revolutionary thought of "equality". Today's demoliberal planet has reached an apogee on this issue, acknowledging that all people on a global scale are equal not only in rights, but besides in their nature and essence.Thus, any cultural differences are irrelevant. These equal ideas of "humanity" and "humanity" have become the chief dogma of leftist liberal democracies. The dogma so strong that it is unquestionable – let its power be demonstrated by the fact that denying it is equivalent to being considered equivalent to medieval “heretics”, which must be “excommunicated” in today's sense of the term, that is, excluded from society, or at least punished for “the speech of hatred”. Historically, however, until the triumph of mass democracy in the 20th century, people from another continents were treated by Europeans as “foreign” alternatively than members of 1 large “humanity”. Similarly, the question of belonging to the Catholic Church was considered. Whoever was outside the Church was a “heretic” alternatively than “an equal Catholic man who has the right to his own worldview and values, and the same political rights”. The divisions besides existed within European civilization, which became peculiarly dramatic with the emergence of Protestantism and spiritual wars. Nevertheless, European civilization was 1 "great family", which could be seen over the centuries in the ties of household aristocracy and monarchs that crossed national borders. However, these accounts never went beyond Christianity and Europe. European families were married to 1 another, but never to another religions or to representatives of non-European cultures. It should be added that the enlightened thought of “humanity” is 1 of the main foundations of globalism – a task to build a “global village” subordinated to 1 central power, over which the exclusive kind of political liberal democracy is dominated for globalisation (as symbolized by the UN idea: quasi-world government). Europe conquered and colonized the planet by exercising power over it, but until the 20th century it did not let strangers to settle in its territory and did not recognise them in any way as "equal." This is simply a historical fact, not an issue of ideological fanaticism.
It is from the value of Enlightenment that the attitude of liberal democracies towards migration grows. For left-wing democrats there is no difference between Europeans and residents of another continents. This is the reason why the political left has opened the gates of Europe wide, and everyone, from all corner of the world, has the right to apply for a visa, work permit, settlement and yet citizenship. It is this suicidal worldview of the “brotherhood of humanity”, in opposition to the conventional concept of “your own – alien” (friend-enemy), that is the basis of values professed by the left-wing democratic elites, and at the same time the origin of approval for mass migration into Europe. The thought of "humanity", which is expressed in the present historical minute by the thought of globalism, is an act of suicide of Western nations and poses a deadly threat to the endurance of our civilisational circle.
GENEV CONVENTION AND fresh YORK PROTOCOL — TRIUMF GLOBALIST LEVIES
1 of the most crucial legislative sources of the modern migration disaster is the alleged Geneva Convention, or the Convention on the position of Refugees in Geneva on 28 July 1951, which precisely defines the exile as a individual who held specified a position under erstwhile agreements, and at the same time 1 who became 1 due to events prior to 1 January 1951. In fact, the paper reduced the definition of refugees to a European civilization only, that is, it had a limited cultural, civilizational and geographical scope. The situation was amended by the "Protocol on exile position drawn up in fresh York City on 31 January 1967", which removed the evidence of events prior to 1 January 1951, and in Article I, point 3, stated that: "This protocol will be applied by the States which are parties to it without any geographical restrictions (...)", which in practice extended the notion of "refugee" to the full globe, beginning the Pandora box of mass award of this position to people from all corners of the world.
With the establishment of the Geneva Convention and the fresh York Protocol, the eventual triumph of the ideas of Enlightenment, the internationalist, the Marxist left, and the interest of large corporations from the signs of the ideology of capitalism, over the West took place. Soon, he was joined by the mass publishing of work permits, which resulted in the flood of Western states by inexpensive labour from Asia and Africa. Asylum is present utilized by the 3rd planet human masses to get residence permits and a comfortable life in the European civilization circle, which only exacerbates cultural and cultural conflicts and generates immense costs for western taxpayers who are forced by their countries to keep abroad cultural groups from their own resources and accept their presence in their territory. The concept of "refugees" outside the ellipse of European civilization, the concept of "azile" for people of abroad cultures, namely the Geneva Convention and the fresh York Protocol, must be spoken – Europe and the West cannot play the historical function of the savior of the world. All the more so if the cost is their own annihilation.
REPLY OF POLITICAL LEVIES
In the 20th century, the final takeover of European civilization by the political left took place. During this century, it took over the governments and institutions of the Western world, after which it began to change the legal systems according to its revolutionary and anti-traditional worldview. The Left has led to a situation in which the ideas of equality have triumphed over Europe and like unlimited freedom in the private sphere (especially in matters of sexual freedom and household destruction). It was the political left that destroyed the institution of marriage, began fighting the patriarchate, promoting extremist feminism, and at the same time in cooperation with its capitalist allies, it approves and encourages mass immigration to the European continent from abroad cultural circles. By promoting abortion, contraception, divorce and sexual freedom, it contributed to the collapse of the institution of matrimony and the deepening of the demographic disaster of the West. It has led to what was the essence of communism and remains the core, identical to this system, liberal democracy: replacing religion and God, the absolute authority of the "universal", secular, atheistic and laity state that interferes in all aspect of human life.
The leftist-liberal elites of Europe and the West commit the overt betrayal of our civilization and the people they should represent. It was thanks to their socialist and etatistic, hedonist and bureaucratic policies that led to the demographic disaster of our continent, and present the gates of Europe were opened to immigration from all over the world, which is explained by the “age of the population”.
Marxists in the 19th century liberated the “proletariat” and wanted to carry him to the rank of the ruling class. In the early 21st century, this reasoning is inactive present, and the spirit of Marxism penetrates the political and social body of Europe. The fresh proletariat was made mediocre from the 3rd World, massed into Europe by the political left, which encourages her to come to our continent, backing taxes paid by cultural residents for benefits, asylums, residence rights, settlements and yet citizenship. In this fresh “class struggle”, the European cultural “proletarian” becomes a non-European. The goal remains the same, and if this phenomenon fails to be stopped, it will have dramatic consequences for our civilisation: the consequence will be the demolition of the "burge" in the present form, or annihilation of the Western man. The instrument of the left has always been to incite the masses to fight against alleged oppressors.
Ultimately, concepts specified as "azil" and "azilant" are besides the products of the political left. Never before in the past of Europe has anyone been accepted from abroad cultural circles just due to the fact that there was a war in a given place of the world. specified a concept would have been considered absurd and insane a 100 years ago. On what grounds is it recognised that Europeans have a work to keep and shelter people from abroad cultural circles simply due to the fact that they are at war? Europe has adequate interior problems: it is not and cannot be the savior of the full world. There is, of course, another problem: Europe has lost its sense of identity. The average European does not know who he is, he has abandoned his nature, which has been shaped by history, religion and tradition, and has thus turned into a devoid being, the consumer of a global village.
LIABILITY OF CAPITALISM AND large BUSINESS
A shoulder to shoulder with the revolutionary and hedonist political ideology of the left treads materialistic capitalism manifested by the power of powerful, supranational corporations and large business, with the capital on fresh York Wall Street. The cult of money is the soul of mass democracy.
The business class corresponds to a pre-revolutionary class of townspeople with dominant traders among it. She never held power within European civilization until the Enlightenment and the French Revolution established a classless society and equality of political rights, and money worship dominated the West. Business has always been profit-oriented – it should be noted that this pre-revolutionary one, however, had religious, household and social issues in mind. This contemporary brings all aspects of reality only to the rank of commodity, and the culmination of this process is the stock exchanges, with the mentioned Wall Street at the head, as a symbol of the hegemony of the “money religion” over the West. planet business, founded on the basis of economical liberalism, which in its historical beginnings was of a national nature, and as time passed it became global – is only curious in maximising profit. Hence the obsession with cost-cutting, mass production of the cheapest items, the treatment of man as a "human resource" – the concept of dehumanized and dehumanizing, which is the best evidence of the values of modern anti-civilization. The perversion of this strategy is culminating in the fact that even killing children (as defined by the left as abortion) has become a origin of advanced profits, the best example of which is the abortion organization Planned Parenthood in the US. For these reasons, large business has nothing to do with tradition, culture and civilization – without opposition it moves jobs to Asia to produce the cheapest possible, maximize profits and cut costs. This is how it takes the livelihoods of Europeans and Americans. All of this takes place with full engagement of democratic and liberal states with their left-wing political class, which does not defend the interests of its constituents, but stands on the side of the capitalist-ethatic system.
The situation in the US is an excellent example of the disaster that the West has created, with full participation and approval of the mainstream political class. West Virginia was celebrated for its coal mining industry, Pennsylvania and Ohio from the powerful steel manufacture under the name of U.S. Steel, Michigan was the heart of 1 of the largest automotive industries in the world. global capital destroyed it all, cutting costs and moving production to Asia. Effect: Depopulated areas, collapse of large cities specified as Detroit, a immense problem of unemployment and drug abuse.
West-shaped, capitalist business knows no bounds and holiness. Its perfect kind of man is devoid of the identity and value of an individual whose task is to continually consume. There is 1 chief thought behind it, 1 “god”: profit. On the another hand, social democracies do not defend any values, but full let economical demolition of Western societies and states. Whoever moves western jobs to Asia, taking our civilisational circle's livelihoods – is guilty of an act of betrayal.
If this economical model is not changed, if it is not subject to higher principles and values: it will lead to a full desolation of what has survived from Western civilization.
FORTECA EUROPE AND CASUS JAPANIA
If the dogmas of openness, globalisation and liberalism are not challenged, if Europe and the West do not start to treat themselves as a separate, closed civilization circle, their endurance will be threatened. The concept of “Forteca Europa”, in the form presented by the Identitarian Movement, may be the only way to save our civilization. Of course, this is not an thought adequate in the face of the modern crisis – you will close yourself within the demographically dying cultural area, ruled by the left-wing ideology of liberalism, Marxism, statolatism, statolatria, bureaucracy and hedonism, of the main proponents of the “sexual revolution” – Wilhelm Reich and Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld (patrons of the 20th century sexual revolution), is only delaying the inevitable fall. A counter-revolutionary political-social-cultural change is needed, which will completely change the political scenery of the West, giving it a chance to renew and survive.
Let us draw an example from the past of Japan. What did this state look like erstwhile the policy of isolation was in force, and what was the effect of beginning up to the world? Of course, this outward beginning in the case of Japan was forced by military force by the United States and was nothing but the imposition of a western, highly materialistic, capitalist-ethatic model, which in the 19th century began to dominate the full globe. In 1635, during the reign of the Tokugawa shogunate, Japan completely closed to the outside planet by introducing a policy of isolationism, called “sakoku” (jap. “closed country”). It was a perceptive decision, testifying to the wisdom of the leadership class and its ability to anticipate the far-reaching consequences of ongoing processes. The nipponese realized that the influences of Europeans, the activities of Jesuits and, above all, the spreading Christianity, are a deadly threat to their culture and state. The doctrine of isolation was in force for over 200 years, erstwhile the American fleet led by Matthew Perry forced her to suspend and sign the treaty of Kanagawa in 1854. Japan's “modernization” followed, leading to the demolition of the samurai caste, and yet the thought of the empire itself, with the defeat during planet War II. The emperor became a puppet, Japan a cultural colony of the West, and the consequence was the failure of the national identity of this country and the transformation of it into a copy of the materialistic West. Modern Japan is simply a theatre, a facade of no longer existing tradition. Theoretically, it inactive has an emperor, a resident will sometimes start a kimono, and in the scenery there are pagodas – the model of life and principles are, however, the absolute other of the nipponese tradition, being a copy of modern solutions taken from the Hedonist-liberal-materialistic West. The last to argue this trial was the most prominent nipponese author of the 20th century Yukio Mishima, who in 1970, along with his military organization “Tarcza” (Tatenokai), attempted to carry out a coup – the assassination failed and Mishima committed seppuku. present Japan is simply a colony of the West that has lost its identity and pays the highest price for it: the nipponese people are dying demographically. We mention this example due to the fact that it is essential to ask a question: would Japan hold its culture, tradition and identity for so long if it were not for the decision to close the planet in 1635? The only answer is no. She would have been conquered and colonized much earlier. The same destiny awaits Europe and the West if they do not adopt the policy of isolationism. It should be added, however, that the case of Europe can be much more tragic due to the fact that a large part of immigration on the continent comes here not so much from strangers, but from openly hostile and aggressive cultural circles.
SUMMARY
The proposal is one: a migration and demographic disaster cannot be stopped if, in Europe and widely understood The West will not undergo a major change in the political, cultural and social system. This is due to the fact that dogmas and constitutional principles of liberal democracy, the political activity of the left and the large business, bear full work for the process of the extinction of cultural populations, while allowing immigration from Asia and Africa.
Solutions specified as a ban on entry into a given country are nothing new. This ban is presently in force in the United States for the population of 12 countries including Somalia, Iran, Haiti, Afghanistan. It is besides possible to eliminate, and surely to retreat from, globalist institutions specified as the UN and the WHO, which have been overrun by hostile states to the West and act against it, representing the interests of the 3rd World. Their essence is that they are trying to impose solutions and make legal standards of a transnational nature, putting themselves above sovereign states. The denunciation and abolition of the Geneva Convention together with the fresh York Protocol, which is 1 of the main sources of the modern migration disaster, is an absolute necessity.
There will be no triumph over globalisation unless it is yet struck, and the wider West, from European civilization, will not introduce an isolationist policy. Isolationism, which will divide the planet into closed civilization circles, will end global trade, reconstruct factories, manufacture and jobs to Europe and the United States, at the same time prohibiting their transfer to another parts of the globe. This requires the simultaneous elimination of the social state model, which generates tremendous production and labour costs.World trade, global corporations, industrial transfers to another countries, open borders – they are neither a historical nor a modern necessity. It is the dogmas of a corporate, demoliberal and globalistic worldview. If we want to win in the fight against globalisation, we must completely negate it, not build systems and solutions based on its principles. The West has bonded in a deadly, economical embrace with Asia, allowing it to take over what is crucial to the self-sufficiency of our civilization circle. It was primarily Asia who benefited from this, receiving the chance to enrich and copy technologies that she had never had before. The West, putting comfort above effort, pays the highest price for it: the failure of jobs contributes to the depopulation of the province, and this deepens the demographic disaster, bringing the end of our civilization closer. This mortal relation between the West and the remainder of the planet must be interrupted by all means and methods. For the full to make sense, let us stress again what we have said in another place: within the West itself there must be a extremist change in the strategy and culture. Persistence in left-wing capitalistism of the model of social states will make isolationism meaningless and the fall of the West will progress. Those liable on the political side of the left must be excluded from the decision-making process and then held accountable for the decisions and policies that destruct our civilisation. Doctor of Counterrevolution Joseph de Maistre observed in the early 19th century:
"All the greatness, all the power, all the obedience are based on the hangover: it is he who is the horror and binder of the human congregation. Remove this incomprehensible origin from the world: at the same minute chaos will reign in place of order, thrones will fall and society will disappear."
Allowance, tolerance and acceptance for the political left and its actions, walking side by side with a deficiency of criminal responsibility, are among the main reasons for the collapse of the West. Left-liberal values must be declared war with a legislative apparatus. Not all values and views have the right to function in public space. Especially those that degrade culture and destruct society.
A fresh Iron Curtain is needed. The weakened West, the cradle of which is Europe, needs isolation to be reborn, as the affected body needs remainder to fight the virus. This virus of the West is the political left, which in the course of centuries manifested itself in various forms and forms: liberalism, capitalism, tolerance, Enlightenment, Socialism, Marxism, the thought of political “equality”, statolatria, the model of social state, or modern totalitarian democracy and the power of masses. Their common feature has always been the attack on the hierarchical, authoritarian and spiritual foundations of our culture and the resulting order.
This aspect is simply a substance of life and death, endurance or extinction. What has remained of European civilization after the tragedies of the 20th century will not last this century unless the political and social scenery of Europe and the West is radically changed. In fact, since at least the first period of planet War I, which has put an end to European monarchies, we no longer live within European civilization, but within post-European civilization. Liberal democracy, left-wing democracy, globalisation, the social state model, humanitarian sentimentalism, political and legal equality, classless society, is denying what Europe has always been. Since Charles the large sat on the imperial throne in 800, Europe has been the creation of 3 forces: the Catholic Church, the monarchy and the aristocracy. With the advent of the 20th century, all 3 were destroyed and mass democracy took over Europe. The consequences of this civilizational disaster are felt with full force today, due to the fact that this strategy is the origin of all our problems. It was demos that allowed political traitors and economicists to rule, that demos trampled religion and holiness, replacing them with consumerism, narcissism and selfishness, that demos opened the gates of Europe to the full world. In the end, he was the 1 who raised both capitalism and socialism: egoistic religions, shortsighted, greedy, and destructive masses. This is the end of a civilization in which the authorities represented by the actual elite were destroyed. Europe's further existence will only be possible if it recreates the fire of the old tradition as it did in the case of Ancient Rome, which survived in a changed form in the form of Byzantium, ensuring another 1000 years of existence.
Mariusz Starved
![A gdyby śmierci nie było? [o „Trzecim królestwie” Knausgårda]](https://krytykapolityczna.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Szablon-rozmiaru-obrazkow-na-strone-2.png)
