I urge “New authority” PT Komcionautoms are not even due to the fact that it is simply a good book per se, just due to the fact that it is appropriate to have an opinion on it. And I besides have this problem that for a long time I have been saying the same thing as Gdula – so PT Komcionauts will be asking to correct the inevitable cognitive mistake in specified situations.
I'll start by picking on you. The book is simply a concept of growth, there are not even 100 pages. I would say a brochure. And yet 2 chapters are recycled from earlier publications.
Giving this number ISBN simply offends my spiritual feelings as a professional knocker. But I besides realize that Gdula is professionally publishing something else, elsewhere.
What I wrote above is insanely petty. And as a result, I'm going smoothly to agree with Gdula.
It is impossible to read my blog without noticing that I have always considered myself a middle-class representative. In practice, I can't remember since, I guess, the mid-1990s, due to the fact that I read quite a few Orwell, and this is 1 of the classics of the subject.
From many cometaries on my blog, I remember that even about 10 years ago many people did not realize the concept. They were interpreted as “people with average earnings” or asked about profitable forks.
Now it's like less. It seems to me that most of my PT komcionauts have accustomed first of all to the fact that the class division does not coincide with income quantiles ("lower mediate class" earns little than "worker aristocracy" and this is not a fresh or different phenomenon).
Gdula besides seems to be conducting any kind of publicist run to make the mediate class aware that she is. He taunts (well) with naive, denim egalitarianism that since we all walk in the same jeans, there are no large differences between us.
The foundation of Polish conservative neoliberalism was to tell the mediate class (for many years astoundingly effective) that it is simply a unity with a higher class. any publicists inactive usage the dichotomie “transformation beneficiaries” / “economically excluded persons”.
I've always fought this dichotomy. This is evidenced by respective years of archives of entries on this blog. Beneficiaries and beneficiaries of transformation will be found on all level of the social ladder.
In the note ‘Katylina’s oath’ from 2016 I wrote that historically the Republican strategy was best done by an alliance of the mediate class with the lower class against the higher class – and the emergence of an alliance of the higher with the average or higher with the lower 1 meant the end of the republic.
This can be shown nicely on the example of the Grakh brothers and the fall of the Roman republic, but besides on the fall of the Weimar republic (when the German small-towners tired of the chaos began to support Hindenburg's Camaryla, and consequently Hitler's) or the French II Republic (who first finished the anti-proletarian alliance higher with the June 1848 average and then reversed this alliance in 18 brumaire Louis Napoleon).
The diagnosis of Gdula – if I summarize it correctly – coincides with mine (and so I fear confirmation bias). This dichotomy has been a lie from the beginning, and the fresh crisis of democracy comes from the fact that abruptly a large part of society has ceased to believe in the authoritative mainstream description of society.
On the 1 hand, we have an angry mediate class (“if we are beneficiaries of transformation, where are these benefits?”). On the another hand, the folk class, skillfully slanted into the mediate class (see: they are elites!), by actual elites.
The way out of the pit leads to the awakening in the mediate class of class consciousness (so I realize Gdula's proposal). Interestingly, in a portal discussion about his articles on the Town, most politicians seem to accept this postulate (from Zandberg to Lubnauer, everyone already speaks the language of the tripartition).
There's 1 exception: Breakfast. due to the fact that in fact, now only the Law and Justice are driving this lie. Earning tens of thousands of propagandaists defend the ministers' service credit cards against “the elite attacks”.
But if you take the PiS from them that's a lie, what's left? Nothing but admitting that from the beginning they only wanted “now, k..., us!” So possibly there's a small ray of hope here?
