Half a century ago in February 1976 MP Stanisław Stomma (1908-2005) as the only MP did not support changes in the Constitution of the Polish People's Republic, which afraid Poland's "unbreakable alliance" with the USSR. He abstained. I am a supporter of a logical and only real state after planet War II or PRL. However, this kiss-ass evidence disgusted me.
Today in Poland, the community of journalists and publicists associated with the magazine “Review” I truly like calls for action by parliament to hinder the possible exit of Poland from the European Union.
After the systemic changes after 1989, the words “you are allowed less” came out in Michnikowska’s “Gazeta Wyborcza”. These included activists of the Polish United Workers' Party. It awakened my deep opposition. It was political discrimination.
Today, the publicist community associated with “Review” replicates words Ewa Milewicz against those people who are against Poland's membership in the European Union or who are starting to have doubts about it. Poles with specified doubts are increasing. Is it possible that the “Review” wants to treat them as “Election” treated the activists of PZPR or self-defense. Is the “Review” according to the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Art of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the Law of the
Leszek Miller – The policy which is simply a symbol of pro-European policy and the Prime Minister who introduced Poland to the European Union highlights the madness that has been done present in Brussels. Prime Minister Miller warns against a dangerous military-pro-war course aimed at confrontations with Russia. He is besides taunting ideological madness, whose symbol has become a vote rejecting the message that “only a biological female can get pregnant and have a baby”.
Will the "Review" of the erstwhile leader of the Democratic Left Alliance besides consider a "political brawler"? Does the editorial board usually consider that Poland should stay in the European Union regardless of what it will be? Does left-wing writing want to establish a political dogma? Will the letter promoting social democratic ideas support Brussels in its actions against the perfect left?
I think it's completely different. This week's editors are truly smart people. The editorial squad “Review” decided to make an ad. Tie together non-reflective post-michnikov supporters of the European Union. I think the thought is medium. Does “Review” truly want readers to measurement Grandma Kasi and Marty Lempart? It is simply a pity that, alternatively of dealing with political analysis, an crucial opinionary weekly wants to participate in a valance created by post-styrofoam formations.
In the post-war period there was sectarian political party, which over our Polish national interest put allegiance to the USSR. He wrote about these people with the highest contempt for the gene. Sigmund Berling and Władysław Gomulka. I hope that the "Review" will not want to enter into the ugly part of left-wing history.
The curiosal appeal has already appeared in the Christmas issue of the weekly. erstwhile activist of the blessed memory of the Civic Movement of Democratic Action, Democratic Union and Freedom Union Prof. Andrzej Romanowski concluded his text with the words "I think that the Sejm should yet proceed with the existing bill to hinder Poland's exit from the European Union". In the current issue, the editor-in-chief expressed the same conviction Jerzy Domański (Edministrative Appeal to the Sejm) and editor Robert Walenciak (Stop for Polexit).
The current issue includes the "Apel" which reads: "We are convinced that the Coalition of 15 October will hold power until the end of its word of office, we believe that after the election the pro-European coalition will be re-established, but these elections will take place in a year and a half, so we must act immediately (...) Polish membership in the European Union is simply a fundamental substance for our national existence". Sounds like a text from the organization Citizens' Coalition newsletter, not the weekly Polish left. Does the "Review" want to girdle antisocial and liberal movements of the civilian Coalition.
The authors stress that specified a decision on a possible exit of Poland from the EU can only be decided by the result of a national referendum. It's completely incomprehensible to me. Firstly, the result of the referendum in today's Poland is not binding on the decision of the Sejm and the President. Secondly, we live (at least in theory) in a democratic state, so the composition of Parliament mostly reflects the views of voters. Thirdly, how do the parties know in what direction the European Union will go, and will future presence be profitable?
The parties to the exit from the European Union are about 25%. Supporters over 67%. In this case, Brussels politicians do not see a political number in favour of sovereign Poland as obstructing action – so to any degree persecution. In another cases, all number is hoarded and protected by Brussels policy supporters.
Such calls and actions will, of course, strengthen on the political phase the fundamentalists of the EU and the anti-EU. Today, erstwhile it begins to break the created division between Tuski and KaczyńskiThe worst thing would be to build a fresh division into a block. Tusk and Brauna/Mentzena. This would again wall up the political scene for many years, and the public debate would be stuck in a barren dispute – for or against the Union. No major questions – which Poland and which Union. Not whose Poland and whose Union.
The presence or absence in the European Union should be analysed only by the prism of benefits and losses for Polish peoples. All these pathetic and ideological fickles are designed to obscure the real picture.
Łukasz Jastrzeżski