The presidential run is over. Karol Nawrocki – President-elect – completes his cabinet and prepares for swearing in, and his opponents from the ruling coalition inactive dream of questioning the results of his choice and blow to the degree of the "falsification" occurring almost always cases of incorrect work of election committees.
However, regardless of these vectors of the current political tension in Poland, there is simply a fresh conflict for power. On the 1 hand, about her being taken over by the opposition – if not by voting on a vote of confidence/trust for Donald Tusk's government and trying to make a "technical government", then in efforts to advance accelerated parliamentary elections. On the another hand – about its maintenance by the ruling coalition and carrying out reconstruction of the government, possibly with the fresh Prime Minister. The problems of Poland and Poles disappeared from the communicative of the fighting parties.
Commentators and experts – above all in the field of political discipline and sociology – first threw themselves on K. Nawrocki's win and on R. Trzaskowski's loss, and then on issues of endurance of the current power, chances of creating a "technical government" and yet on its reconstruction. Both in the space of the ongoing conflict and in the space of its explanation, we observe the concentration of entities not on the meanings of the declared ideas and concepts and the way they are implemented, but on the form of their peculiar usage – to keep or gain power. For example, not on freedom, sovereignty – the exception is prof. Stanislaw Bielen – or independence, of which he spoke and speaks only to Grzegorz Braun – but to the electorate who is susceptible to these ideas and the ability to keep it or enlarge it.
Destructive Options
In this way, not only is Poland's situation becoming worse compared to the escalation of the war in Ukraine and the expansion of terrorist attacks in Russia by Kiev, but besides the emerging fresh threat to Poland at geopolitical level is underestimated. It comes from the increasing military force of Germany and the increasingly pro-Ukrainian and at the same time aggressive policy towards Russia by their fresh chancellor Friedrich Merz. Both expanding Berlin's support for the remaining power without constitutional legitimacy Volodymyr Zelensky, as well as increased investment in arms in Germany can enjoy only politicians of PO-PiS, PSL and all left-wing formations. Only they – not the Polish nation – sought this in the media and in global forums. Representatives of our mediocre country, severely experienced by their western neighbour, fought to spend at least 2 percent – and now up to 5 – of their national income exceeding many times our Polish.
For the first time in history, Polish politicians and mainstream media began to care about the reinforcement of Germany, despite the fact that their 2 and more 5 percent per German army would make it the first military power in Europe. Moreover, for the first time Poland was included in an uncontrolled arms race imposing a military mode on the European economy. A race that has nothing to do with the necessity of building a strong Polish army, independent of NATO's war programs. However, the most tragic thing is that this devious anti-Polish policy is being implemented under the highest slogans of expanding Europe's safety and strengthening NATO's unity and unity against "the threats from Russia". Polish militarists – who are primates among Natian militarists – not only do not take into account the peaceful coexistence with Russia and its ally – Belarus, but are preparing for a war to annihilate it. Not only are they incapable to tolerate her, they apply racism to Russians. They give Poles the mouth of a nation capable only of war. They are besides doing everything to guarantee that Poland enters the shoes of Israel in east Europe incapable to accept the Palestinian people and their country. They besides change the civilization-cultural face of Poland and the national identity of Poles to a level comparable to destructive anthropological influences of genderism. They form contemporary Polish patriotism on negative ideas and negative community emotions. It has nothing to do with Christianity—our foundation of civilization—promoting peace and peaceful coexistence of nations, the dignity of all human individual and all nation, taking into account their rights.
There is evident political and moral guilt of the ruling Polish self-appointed elites. However, there is no work or even discussion about it. At the most, between the lines, individual farts that specified a suicidal policy stems from a strategical alliance with the US that dictates NATO's direction of action. Almost all day from the mouth of politicians and mainstream media we hear the assurance that this alliance is the highest warrant of Poland's existence. Apart from doubting these assurances, 1 wonders – there is no mention to the Polish nation as a spiritual and civilization-cultural guarantor of Poland. Not only in the historical and axiological dimension, but besides in the political dimension.
Is vassalization inevitable?
Poland is vassalized. Prof. Stanisław Bielen He writes about desuverenisation – since the time of Jean Bodin usually combined with the state concept. Prof. Gracian Cimek on Poland's engagement in global hegemony modes, owned by the USA. From a civilization-cultural point of view, the mechanics of the mentioned hegemony allows to point out negative processes in relation to Poland. To Cracian Silent So we separate in it the existence of 2 currents: neoliberal globalisation, implementing the Davos agenda and Trumpism representing modern American imperialism. Both options mean the desuverenization of Poland, albeit to an uneven extent. A brief look at these 2 hegemonic agendas makes it possible to conclude that Trumpism is little oppressive in its vassalizing practice. Above all, due to the promotion of conservative values in culture and social life.
The most crucial evidence of American global hegemony in Poland is the presence of American bases in its territory and acceptance of this state of affairs by the Polish people. This acceptance is simply a evidence to changes in the national identity of Poles, who in their majority do not imagine Poland's continued existence without an umbrella of the USA and NATO. Illustrate this political and civilization-cultural situation by comparing it with Denmark, whose parliament approved in fresh days a "defensive agreement" with the US. It allows American troops to be stationed in 3 Danish airbases and to be able to store military weapons and equipment in the territory of that country. The majority of Danes argue this "agreement" – in favour of ratifying this form of global hegemony of the United States, which is euphemistly referred to as "defensive agreement", is only 28 percent of Danish society. The vast majority is opposed to its ratification, defining an agreement to lose sovereignty and rejecting the thesis of its supporters on improving national security. The debate accompanying ratification and street protests reiterates the thesis against the danger posed by Russia as its possible enemy, which both US-owned agendas indicate, both neoliberal and the 1 referred to as Trumpism.
The comparison between Denmark and Poland in the field of desuverenisation is disastrous to the detriment of Poles. The smallest of the Nordic countries with full area: 43,094 sq mi and population of 5,756 170 should embarrass us. We can only dream about specified advanced political and national awareness and about specified advanced level patriotism and freedom of expression. In Poland – many times more numerously and surfacely – naming specified agreements by name is regarded as an orwellian thought of crime, for which there is simply a hazard of not only political, but besides civilian and even moral responsibility. Any Pole who dared to publically undermine the sense of stationing American bases in our homeland – even more so, the creation of an global hub in Jasionka close Rzeszów for the spread of weapons to Ukraine – is treated not only as Putin's agent but besides as a traitor to Poland. Moreover, he is treated as a spiritual apostate acting against the position of the Catholic church silently accepting the vassalization of Poland and any assistance to the Bander Ukrainians.
The comparison with Denmark illustrates the large spiritual and moral and cultural effort that Poles must take to regain independency – not only towards the US, but besides towards the European Union. The proverbial light in the tunnel showed the batch Grzegorz Braun, including in its program the regaining independency of Poland. The Confederation of the Polish Crown with its leader made it impossible – without budget grants and abroad funding, and without access to mainstream media including Catholic ones, attracted 1 million 2 100 1000 Poles to the Polish independency program. The only thing to do is to extend the front of the fight to the soul of the nation – to national and cultural awareness of Poles who will become the most safe and ultimate warrant of their independence. This in turn requires going beyond G. Braun's happenings and unifying independence-patriotic environments in the field of not only politics, but besides culture and education. In this respect, the cave is simply a mature initiative to prepare the law on abroad financing not only of NGOs, but besides of political parties, media and individuals.
The function of metapolitics
The conflict for the soul of the nation perfectly fits – as shown by the Polish culture and historiography of the romanticist era – the universe of ideas and metaphysical and spiritual values, which is now symbolized by |Gietrzwald. The full set of ideas and metaphysical-historical values associated with the millennium anniversary of Bolesław Chrobry's coronation should besides be included. This anniversary shows how, on the basis of the Christianity adopted by Poland, its subjectivity and statehood were recognized – without the participation of political guarantors and guarantees, without defence alliances. What constitutes the eventual mystery of the existence of a human individual is at the same time the mystery of the existence of a nation – so it sits at the level of metaphysics, which we cannot explain due to the fact that it transcends the capabilities of the human mind.
Our waresmen knew this very well, fighting for the preservation of the Polish soul, erstwhile its people did not have their own state and had to be under the regulation of 3 invaders. Our modern enemies besides know about this, ravaging Polish culture and saturating it with anti-Polish content. Metaphysical and spiritual mystery of the existence of the nation cannot be thrown out of the national and cultural awareness of Poles or pushed into communicative of conspiracy theories. We can cleverly incorporate it into the database of permanent data shaping our identity. This identity should be understood as the ability to keep in our axiological consciousness faithfulness to the values that shaped our nation—with Christian moral values at the head. Maintaining a national identity besides means being yourself, being subject to these values in global space.
In this situation, the question arises: is it possible, as part of the Trumpism that respects conservative values, with the enthusiasm adopted by the Polish right hand, to be independent? This will be decided by the function of Polish culture, implemented by perpetuating the national memory of its highest achievements in the past, promoting patriotic aspects and fighting for historical truth, by combating the penetration into its space of the Polish society of the threads of pornography, genderism, Satanism, by preventing it from engaging in the Ukrainianization of Poland and shaping rusophobic attitudes. The function of culture in the field of consciousness and national identity is enormous. Since Antonio Gramschi's time, there has been no global political concept that does not include culture.
International hegemony in Trumpist edition without cultural factors is besides hard to achieve. This aspect raises further questions. What will be the function of Polish national culture in the vassalized by the Trumpism of Poland. Will we inactive gotta import low-quality products of American mass culture, undergo anti-Polish education by various “tefalenes” and cultural institutions maintained by hostile American family-type clans George Soros? The answer is: in strengthening the national identity we should verify not only the business temptations of Trumpism, but besides its enslaving mechanisms in the field of culture, remembered for abroad interference in the interior affairs of the Polish woman Georgetty Mosbacher – Ambassador of the United States to Poland during the first word of their current president. At his motto: America First we must answer: After First Poland.
Prof. Anna Raźny
Photo X profile of Karol Nawrocki
Think Poland, No. 25-26 (22-29.06.2025)
