An election entry to make it before silence: I made myself “lighthouse“ I came up with 82% of the compatibility with Together. This 18% inconsistency is alternatively a substance of semantics, for example, I answered the euro question differently.
I think that Poland * someday* should accept them, due to the fact that in general I am in favour of Poland which 1 of the United States of Europe. I am in favour of a European federation that should have a common army, currency, diplomacy and even a national Bureau of Investigation.
It is clear that *currently* the euro is badly constructed. The single currency requires a common fiscal policy. So we will answer the question differently if by default we presume "in the close future" or "in the end".
Besides, together, it remains my option. I am not going to follow the polls, due to the fact that either they do not take into account that most people will not go to this election anyway – or they give an unrealistic turnout of 60%.
In the erstwhile years it was 23.8% (and before that 24.5% and 20.9%). I can believe in jumping to 30% from poverty, but not 60%.
In the erstwhile election, fewer more than 7 million crucial votes were cast. 1 percent of that is 70,000.
In turn, the poll draws 1,000 respondents, out of which about 600 declare a willingness to go to elections, and 300 will actually go. 1% of that is 3 people.
Consequently, in Euro-elections there are regular surprises around 5%. It is only 350,000 voters (or 15 people in the poll).
So I will not ban myself for just admitting to voting for Spring or Coalition – unless, of course, those agitating behind these parties will abuse hospitality here! – but I find the polling argument mathematically inappropriate.
Speaking of which, comments referring to “d’Hondt” will fly out if they show that the author does not realize the mathematics behind this ordination.
I vote for Together due to the fact that I don't like Polish elites. I specify elite as a higher class + a higher average; people affected by something, people making decisions (for communes there was a useful word "decision-maker", unfortunately it went out of fashion).
The question of whether journalists number among the elite is incorrect for me. any surely do, if apart from being journalists they besides have managerial / executive positions, or manage their own brand as celebrities.
As a secondary columnist and occasional author of books, I am simply a mediate middle class. I can't control anything.
I don't feel liable for the current form of the country or the media due to the fact that I had nothing to say. conventional ripost of Polish Polyann, that "the voters so decided" is false – the key decisions of 1989-1991 were made by the power, which did not even pretend to be democratic.
And erstwhile the foundations of democratic order were built (for a symbolic beginning I consider the 1997 Constitution), we found ourselves in a situation where THEORETICALLY everyone could already set up a party, a paper or television, but PRACTICELY had to compete with elites who had managed to own and build a number of Silver empires. The elite climbed and kicked the ladder behind them.
The side effect is that Polish politics are inactive the same Tusk, Kaczyński, Niesiolowski, Wałęsa, Komorowski, Kwasniewski and Piechociński, only in the spinning staff of variable configurations. Everyone had already betrayed each another in this dance, and everyone swore eternal relationship to each other.
Today the main division is PO vs. PiS, erstwhile AWS vs. SLD, but it's inactive the same dance. These people don't represent us, they're curious in their position reproduction.
The most crucial problem of today's Poland is that decision-makers making 30 1000 (and more) anticipate eternal sacrifices from people earning 3 1000 (and less). erstwhile we ask for something, we always deficiency money that someway magically finds each another erstwhile it comes to raising them.
There are various mechanisms in the West that oblige these decision makers to take account of the welfare of their subordinates. Collective agreements, strong trade unions, "social pacts" concluded under the aegis of government prevent them from exaggerating with exploitation.
All the equivalents of these mechanisms were dismantled in Poland (the oldest mountaineers remember that collective agreements were a common solution until 1996). Nothing was created in their place.
This is not a question of “PO or PiS” or “private or public sector”. They simply built specified a country in the 1990s (yes, they – not us, and surely not me).
Parties controlled by the current elite will never change that. So they can be little evil to me (happyly unnecessary in these elections).
