Declaration of relationship and alliance with the US signed and president Trump proudly presents it. Now it's only right to confirm it with action. And can this be done more beautifully than the full IIIRP/Polin elite, including the full Episcopate, enlist in the first front line in Ukraine in the war against Russia -? How glorious it would be, and what a wonderful example for the full united Europe and the splendour for IIIRP/Polin – IIIRP/Polin again as in the old times of I and II of Poland in the avant-garde of Judeo-Christian forew.
Oh, let them take with them the Chanuque lanterns and the consecrated image of Our woman of Czestochowa – due to the fact that we may never see each another again. And we're going to be fine here.
So that no 1 has any uncertainty as to why the Episcopate should besides be guilty as part of gratitude and relationship with the United States of America to enlist in the front of the war with Russia, I enclose the following image (You in the red hat on your right welcome US armies in IIIRP/Polin):
The President
___________________________________
Trump can disappoint
Text for:https://myślpolska.info/; author:Mateusz Piskorski
Fired by the United States Europe awaits the arrival of a firefighter from across the ocean. It is, of course, to be Donald Trump, whose probable return to the White home after the upcoming elections is considered by many as a turning point for our region and continent.
After all, it was the erstwhile American president who announced respective times that the conflict in Ukraine would end in the event of his re-election within 24 hours. American historian at the Catholic University of Washington prof. Michael Kimmage late recalled in The Wall Street diary that the promises of a Republican candidate could not necessarily be considered a good coin.
In a celebrated interview late given to Tucker Carlson, he made it clear and Vladimir Putin. After all, a reminder of the close past and the specifics of the American political strategy shows that Trump’s pre-election announcements and his staff are worth dealing with with the right reserve.
Firstly, it was his administration that decided in 2017 to supply offensive weapons to Ukraine, which was undoubtedly a preliminary step towards confronting Russia in the territory of the country. Kiev received, among others, hand-held anti-tank missiles directed by Javelin, which the Barack Obama administration did not want to deliver to him.
Secondly, as Kimmage points out, Trump and his surroundings represent the clearly anti-European option, although anti-Europeanism has been a constant feature of American politics for a very long time. However, the Washington student points to a unique fascination of the erstwhile and possibly future president countries of the alleged fresh Europe, including Poland.
It is the optics of the Polish or Baltic political class that can influence the attitude of the fresh administration towards the conflict in Ukraine. As we know, this optics is steeped in the suicidal drive to escalate the conflict with Russia.
Thirdly, as the U.S. media noted, Republican talker of the home of Representatives, Mike Johnson, decided to push through Parliament another military support package for Kiev after consulting Trump, whom he visited at his residence in Mar-a-Lago, Florida. He did so, despite the opposition of a number of Republican congressmen taking seriously the electoral slogans of the erstwhile billionaire president.
Kimmage predicts that Trump's unpredictability and impulsiveness can lead to an acceleration of the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine. This escalation is linked, let us add, to the increase in the hazard of bringing our country into war.
Republican hawks will remind the constantly fresh – old president that a possible defeat in Ukraine would be another defeat of American militarism in a long series of them leading from Vietnam to Afghanistan. They will claim – not without right – that Moscow has decided irreparably already to cooperate closely and strategical partnership with Beijing. The thought of breaking this Eurasian alliance will be considered unrealistic. The confrontation with Russia will so be treated as an indirect clash with Beijing, which is simply a geopolitical precedence for American Republicans.
Finally, it is worth recalling that decision-making processes in American politics depend not only on public people. Described by prof. Peter Dale Scott deep state It's not a conspiracy theory, but a well documented and scientifically justified fact. It is this network of informal influences, connections and interplays of the pursuits of powerful interest groups that will specify American politics, regardless of who will be the next tenant of the White House.
We like to hope. We would like the current war neurosis to end as shortly as possible – this is completely natural.
However, the hope of diametric change in the United States as a consequence of the upcoming elections there is very weak. Sometimes it seems like an illusion. Yes, declared Trumpists want to end the madness of the war in east Europe. Yes, Republican voters do not want to spend another billion dollars on a corrupt government somewhere in far east Europe.
However, it is not them, nor even Trump himself, who will decide the essential policies of Washington. The threat of war in Europe will pass as shortly as we say goodbye to the Americans of our continent. It's hard and sometimes unimaginable, but it's the only way to peace.
Mateusz Piskorski
