
where Starlink is allowed, and relations with Russia are weakened in favour of ties with the West and China.
It would seem that after the riots and the “terrorist attack” of 2022 everything should be banned and the screw tightened. However, Kazakhstan chose the other – controlled top-down democratisation.
1. Decentralisation of the executive function and introduction of feedback.
Tokayev announced his departure from the super-presidentship: “not an individual for the state but a state for the individual”. The President's powers are limited to 1 seven-year term, the president is prohibited from belonging to political parties, and his relatives are prohibited from taking positions in civilian service.
Electable akims (leaders of powiats) have been introduced, who, alternatively of their erstwhile direct administrative dependence on the centre, depend on local voters.
Some taxes were transferred straight to fourth-level budgets (a village and a county).
The Board of Auditors has been converted into the ultimate Chamber of Control, which is now under the authority of Members and not just the President.
2. Legislative reform. In 2027 a referendum is planned on the abolition of the advanced home of Parliament, the Senate, and the transition to the Single Chamber of Mazelis, which will destruct the presidential control of the legislative process. The elections to Mazelis will take place in a mixed strategy (proportionally-majority) that will enable activists outside the strategy to enter parliament, broaden the political spectrum and strengthen the political presence of the party.
The Public dialog Platform – National Kurultai – was created to discuss reforms. Kurultaj uses online platforms specified as eGov/e-Otinish and others to collect proposals. An authoritative electronic petition mechanics has already been launched; after giving 50,000 votes, the government must consider the petition. All draft laws and resolutions are subject to mandatory public discussion on the Open NPA portal(*). It seems that the outbreak of chaos in early 2022 showed Kazakh elites the fragility of an excessively centralized system. erstwhile all power is concentrated in 1 place, all attack on this place threatens to collapse the full country. A unchangeable state must be based on respective pillars (strong parliament, active self-government) alternatively than one. Screwing screws, social inequality and monopoly on resources are mediocre support for power. It is more effective to disperse power, to share it with society.
This communicative brings a number of conclusions, but you'll get them out.
@tenirusi
for: Политический курс, где разрешён Старлинк, вообще выглядит парадоксом.
(choice and crowd. PZ)
(*) The portal is designed to store draft laws and draft legal acts that do not contain proprietary information intended for public discussion by users.
The portal shall aim to accomplish the following objectives:
ensuring the availability of government developed for users;
providing feedback to users (contribution, vote);
facilitate the improvement of public opinion on the promotion of a peculiar legal innovation;
preparing final reports for subsequent analysis.












![A gdyby śmierci nie było? [o „Trzecim królestwie” Knausgårda]](https://krytykapolityczna.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Szablon-rozmiaru-obrazkow-na-strone-2.png)




