UN General Assembly accepted a paper relating to the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The text of the resolution removed ideological wordings concerning "sexual orientation" and "sexual identity", or ideological construct, associated with genderism (neolysenkoism). This decision is the first specified success of conservative environments in the UN. Unfortunately, the Tusk government delegate wanted to overturn the amendment, expressing his support for anti-science.
The UN has withdrawn genderism from the Convention on Persons with Disabilities. The UN General Assembly adopted the 3rd Committee (United Nations General Assembly 3rd Committee) a motion for a resolution, entitled ‘Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol thereto: increased barriers in different contexts” —Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol thereto: amplified barriers in different contexts).
As indicated by the name of the document, it concerns a number of different implementation issues 2006 Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Additional Protocol to this global Agreement. In an extended text of the resolution The UN associate States and the United Nations strategy (i.e. the UN, its bodies, specialised agencies, programmes and funds) are invited to take a number of measures aimed at improving the situation of people with disabilities.
In addition, this paper encourages associate States to review government and guarantee equal access for persons with disabilities to justice, education, the labour market, wellness and public life. As an example, there is simply a request to train judicial staff on the rights of persons with disabilities or to supply available supportive technologies.
The resolution besides highlights the situation of susceptible groups, including women and children with disabilities, migrants with disabilities or people with disabilities surviving in agrarian areas. The paper calls for the elimination of multiple and cross-border discrimination, against violence, including sexual and sex force (gender-based violence) and to advance independent life and participation in the local community.
An example of another recommendations can be given to urge that associate States take action to guarantee that all schools are safe and free from violence, including cyber-violence and sexual harassment, and to deal with all forms of force against disabled children, paying peculiar attention to disabled and susceptible girls.
Egypt submitted on behalf of a group of States associated with the muslim Cooperation Organisation (Organization for muslim Cooperation) Draft amendment, in which the preamble to ‘sexual orientation and sex identity’ was requested to be removed from point 11. The cited provision (points 11, pp. 2-3) of the preamble points to different social, environmental, political, economical or cultural conditions which affect the situation and the anticipation of people with disabilities exercising their rights and reenforce discrimination.
The first motion for a resolution included gender, age, skin color, socio-economic position and sexual orientation (sexual orientation) and sex identity (gender identity).
The European Union opposed the amendment. The Danish typical on behalf of this global organisation stated that the tabled amendment was "deplorable" and that the issues concerning the sodomites and genderists that have been removed hit "the basic rule of non-discrimination".
Furthermore, the previously cited UN Communication stresses that ‘This procedure [notice of amendment] it became an inflammatory point as it afraid wording that many delegations considered to be an integral part of the rule of non-discrimination, while others considered it politically or culturally controversial."
The UN Communication announces that the first vote on the amendment, held on Monday 15 December, ended with a tie of 74-74, with 18 abstentions. A re-vote was so ordered. This time, the amendment was adopted with 81 votes in favour, 77 against and 15 abstentions.
The majority of the countries from Asia and Africa voted for the amendment, and the USA, Argentina, India. All associate States of the European Union voted against, including Poland, Hungary, Italy and Slovakia. As a result, the references to ‘sexual orientation’ and ‘sexual identity’ in the earlier draft resolution were removed from the wording set out in recital 11. The final motion for a resolution, taking into account the amendment tabled by Egypt, was adopted by the General Assembly by a large majority – 176 delegates voted in favour, while only 2 voted against.
The last vote in the General Assembly is simply a peculiar event and without a shadow of a uncertainty worthy of note, as it is the first successful effort to remove from the UN motion for a resolution the wording relating to "sexual orientation" and "sexual identity" (gender identity). akin attempts have been made since 2008, i.e. since specified ideological wording began to appear in draft resolutions of the Assembly, but they have always failed.
Therefore, the last vote in the UN General Assembly can be considered a large triumph for widely understood conservative or pro-family environments. On the another hand, it should be noted that representatives of European states ruled by the alleged right or who are considered conservative have voted against the amendment, mentioning in peculiar Hungary, Italy and Slovakia. The fact that genderism was supported by a typical of the Tusk government should not be surprising.
We besides recommend: From January CBAM will hit average Poles. Among another things, car parts will travel
