According to many commentators and politicians, the Polish political class has been implementing for at least a twelve years a neo-jagelon version of regional policy.
Under this term, there are different versions of the "inter-sea" or "tri-morning", i.e. any kind of alliance of the Central-Eastern European state, covering in peculiar any countries formed by secession or the self-solvation of the USSR (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, Moldova) and the erstwhile east "demoludes" (Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia and possibly besides Romania and Bulgaria). The large absent in this concept is, of course, Belarus, which is the historical heart of the large Kingdom of Lithuania.It is thanks to the power of the descendants of Gedymin (Gedyminovich), and especially Olgird in respective Russian books on the so-called. White Russians have gained forces capable of conquering confederate Russia, which we now call Ukraine. Of course, past is not the most crucial here, but the territorial gap resulting from Belarus' deficiency of participation in this inactive possible venture may have economic, communication and even strategical significance. Why? I already answer: the Neo-Jagelon version of the arrangement of this part of the planet is now openly anti-Russian, so this enemy will do everything to "hold" Belarus to himself in order to break up this relationship.
For a time, the protector and possibly the actual initiator of this imagination were... United States in Government Donald Trump, which was even present at 1 of the meetings of the leaders of the state and government of the region. It is not entirely known that the American protectorate affirmed the anti-Russian version of this concept, especially since the then president of the United States did not belong to enemies of modern Russia, more than that, he was even formally suspected of winning elections through Russian intrigues. He had a clear anti-EU policy, and he said he wanted NATO to be destroyed, so his function could have been rather far from the imagination of our native Russophobes. possibly erstwhile he returns to power in the next election, we will learn more about Washington's possible function in the possible implementation of the task (if it is inactive implemented).
However, in the future of this imagination many express a alternatively profound skepticism: most of the country of this region is reluctant, due to the fact that it simply does not want Polish dominance and should not be surprised, Because the Jagiellonian past divides us alternatively than unite us. All young nationalisms formed a 100 years ago in this region were and are anti-Polish and built (and further build) their identity by deleting or deleting Polish heritage in their territory and "national history". This applies especially to Lithuania and Ukraine, but besides to the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, which in the 15th and 16th centuries were ruled by the Jagiellonians: I will remind you that Władysław Jagiellończyk and his boy Louis wore the crowns of Hungary and the Czech Republic, and the defeat at Mohacz (1526) and Louis's assassination ended definitely this era.
If Ukraine is to be part of the trimorz and 1 day wins the war with Russia, then it and not Poland will be the leader of this concept. It is the country with the largest territory, although it no longer has the top population potential, due to the fact that it has lost over 10 million inhabitants over the last year, who are improbable to return there. But it will have the strongest and “gunned” army in combat, and free equipped with the most modern Western weapons. Will it direct the common interest of all states of the "Trimorese"? This is improbable due to the fact that it was “the Ukrainian soldiers who fought not only to defend their country but to defend Europe against Russian aggression.” It is rather inconceivable that "the wisdom of the historical stage" is besides repeated by Polish politicians. Do they not realize that taking the position of debtor ("they fight for us") degrade us as the leader of this venture. I wonder if, for example, Hungarians or Slovaks or Bulgarians will want to participate in an enterprise whose main force will be the victorious nationalist Kiev?
However, I may be besides far ahead of the future, but it is hard to believe that winning Ukrainian politicians want to make a neo-jagelon union, especially since the national heroes of this country do not just include Stepan Banderabut besides Bohdan Chmielnicki, which effectively rebelled and began erosion of the Republic of both Nations. Is there any way to make a conclusion? I think it's besides soon. First, neo-Bander Kiev would gotta win its (because not our) war.
Prof. Witold Modzelewski
