Miksa: Vincent Witos Institute

Today is the inauguration of the Vincent Witos Institute. As for the institute's patron, of course, I have a very affirmative attitude. He was undoubtedly 1 of the most valuable Polish politicians, he deserved Poland, and alongside R. Dmowski and W. Korfanty belongs to a large 3 Polish politicians of the 20th century. On the another hand, the circumstances of the Institute's establishment prompt me to reflect on the following. First of all, congratulations to PSL for their effectiveness in action. Let us remind that PSL played the establishment of the Witos Institute during the fairs related to the support of PSL for the candidacy of Rafał Trzaskowski in the 2nd circular of the presidential election. It is interesting that here the PSL understood that it exists for the rule of a tied transaction and in abroad policy it is someway hard for them to realize and realize it. On the another hand, I remember how the PSL behaved erstwhile Roman Dmowski and Ignacy Jan Paderewski Institute of Heritage of National thought was announced during the regulation of the Law and Justice, then the PSL was against, claiming that spending public funds on specified an institute was an unjustified public spending. The money spent on the Witos Institute is justified and the “Dmowski Institute” was not? This is simply a hypocritical attitude from the “green” side, due to the fact that they already have the Museum of past of the Polish People's Movement in Warsaw, which is controlled by PSL and financed by public money. To be clear, I think the Museum is most needed and its activities are justified. What I do not realize is why cultivating the memory of the past of the folk movement can number on public financiation, and from "The Institute of Dmowski and Paderewski was made the Institute of Gabriel Narutowicz, who, as 1 of the main purposes of his existence, chose the defamation of the Polish national movement. As it is, the Institutes of Law and Justice were according to the PO, the PSL and the Left an unnecessary expense and were to be dissolved after taking over the power, while after taking over the power were not removed only taken over, and in addition they were inactive multiplied. As the Citizens' Platform says, "What harm can be promised."

Arkadius Miksa