29 June 2025
Or possibly for starters, an interview like the media looks like... what they might look like:
facebook.com/reel/1226479679484332/The title refers to a post about lgtb, due to the fact that the subject has a much broader context than it would seem.
PICTURES AS IF CONDUCTED AGAINST THE UNION
So the full propaganda manufacture is against women's and men's unions and against having children - as I wrote in my first post. In the media, there is fundamentally nothing random, anything that can be utilized by the service.
Welcome back to 1989.
A lot of women take care of their dogs like kids. Basically, a man has to belong to individual or something. Man desires love – I want to give and receive it. This is happening in relation to a partner, to work or to something material, and even, as in this case, to pets.”
Again inconsistency - as they want to teach people to have a dog (instead of a child), is "a man must belong to individual or something," And if they want to discourage children:
Like any "editors."
What a contrast compared to any bizarre show, where amateurs "play" and the script was written by a individual with no thought of the film.
Every character in the show speaks the same way - it's virtually the same individual - due to the fact that it's 1 and the same person: it's a "scanner".
This "screenwriter" wrote all these "dialogues" and his manner of being manifested in all form.
Why is it produced for years and nobody is ashamed to play it and urge it?
"Because they want to make money!"
Here's another explanation for why there are specified shows as school or clan - so that those increasing up close their generation do not realize how well you can pretend to be a character, how well you can play.
I'm telling you, this device works all the time, 24 hours a day, all the time these stones rotate - very slowly, but they spin and grind your brains - almost unnoticed...
First watch the movies and think about what's going on. Then check the analysis.
These are short films, and there are so many traps in them, I'm not certain I've noticed everything...
I would point out the following:
I mention to the content contained in the following films in the form in which they are, and they are plucked, cut out from the context short statements, phrases, combined into 1 full - I measure the individual phrases and the full of the message consisting of these phrases,
I do not mention to the first statements consisting of a longer interview, due to the fact that I do not know them, the conclusions drawn from the analysis of these short films may be completely different from the conclusions of the analysis of the full interview (though they do not have to) - and this is completely understandable, due to the fact that short films can be a completely different communicative than the first longer films
These short films I treat as Separate Complete Works - due to the fact that that's what they are, that's what the fb gave us, through such, not different selection of phrases the author of these videos had something to convey to us and this is what I am analyzing and describing
so the final transmission of these short films is primarily liable for the author of the assembly, the individual who selected the individual phrases consisting of a short film, not the interviewer - although it may be suspected that his statements, behaviour and manner of speaking were carefully planned and agreed with the film's author
And besides specified a remark about possessions, which cannot be ruled out, even more so due to the fact that it is inactive an unexplored solid issue for me: proving that an alien, unknown individual is possessed, is difficult.
facebook.com/reel/591899783567452
Because a female doesn't request a relation to be happy, but you want to be active.
What, and you're not a female anymore?
half of your another life
The second life of the "second"??
“In my experience of working with my patients, I noticed that during the pandemic the thought of having dogs alternatively of children began to grow stronger due to factors specified as unemployment, isolation at home with lots of free time and loneliness and increased anxiety and depression“ - I'm sorry. [meaning deficiency of a child, partner, family, people taking a substitute... - MS]
‘Some women They don't want to anymore. Get married.This is because popular present concept, that you no longer gotta start a household to be happy - I'm sorry. is simply a false concept, calculated to destruct the demography of the nation not only Polish - MS
There are any symptoms that may propose that individual treats a dog like a child. It's spending more money on animals than on yourself, publishing an exaggerated number of photos of the pet or creating its profile on social networks. Thus the individual begins to put large expectations in his pet.
The consequences of this phenomenon may be separation from the environment, overprotective behavior, worsening relationships at work, school, among friends or family, lowering quality of life on all levels, and even breaking up with reality.
conceptBy English dictionary, it's - consciously adopted way of knowing something, solving the problem or achieving the goal
"because a female doesn't request a relation to be happy"
According to the Polish language rules, at the end it should be an "a".
Because you said "a", alternatively of "a" (and it's not a typo in the text - she said it), it actually breaks the meaning of that sentence, due to the fact that it's not in Polish, it's a fresh gibberish coming out... that is, if anything, it's not a lie...
It's a fake. conceptand the correct thesis is:
"because a female needs a relation to be happy"
Those words in the movie, false - refer at most to:
- women philosophers who spend time lying around reasoning about abstract things,
- to women who are financially independent and pretty, who have adorators (we see them constantly in magazines about fashion, on tv shows, etc. and sometimes in life)
- young, inexperienced girls, surviving safely with their parents
Only specified people can accept these sleazy words as a good coin - others will say to themselves, "Well, that's just any short phrases ripped out of context"...
So CELEM are young girls.
- women are very anxious not to spend their lives alone, the 2 of us in the household always are - man is simply a social being
- women very much want to have their own warm home, or an flat where they could gap up if needed and in peace wait out any uncomfortable period, or simply - a troublesome menstruation - and the 2 of them are easier to get this basic request (living)
- a female has the request to share words and feelings with individual - we see it all day - And relationships are mostly talked about by women and frequently by women.
- women request to have children and to be a parent and a mother
- women are gentle, non-aggressive and are much weaker than men - that's why women depend on uncovering a decent, resourceful and loving man in this twisted planet to defend them in case of anything
- household is simply a safety warrant for a woman, due to the fact that if she's not married, that's father, brother, sons, uncles, etc.
- a individual surviving alone will endure with time - deficiency of relation just, depression etc.
All of this has to do with the most crucial needs of women - the request for security.
A man is the first request of a female - to cover her beloved with her own gem in case she comes from strangers and not just countries.
women now operate in different fields outside the home - so they're active... - MS
In young marriages, usually both spouses work professionally. due to this, their goals are different from those that people had before, that is, the desire to start a household with children.
So women's professional work is not conducive to starting a family?
My mom worked professionally her full life, and she had 3 kids and quite a few women had that, what's the matter?
It's not a job, it's cultural factors, it's a lifestyle -- it's a fashion for not having children. Where is this coming from?
I get the thought that guys spend besides much time in front of the mirror and on the phone, and alternatively of taking cute pregnant women with shitty diapers, they like a gym and lans in company, and a female doesn't want to crap herself in front of everything - but possibly I'm wrong...
It's just a concept...
There are many reasons for this state of affairs, including access to contraception, and so permission, or even fashion for abortion, but above all it is to environment young people with circumstantial patterns of conduct in which there were no children and family.
The German Bravo magazine published in Poland for 26 years (1991 - 2017) raised generations of Poles to a circumstantial way of being, lifestyle.
From the beginning the letter was addressed to teenagers, and his The subject was about pop culture, as well as issues related to puberty and sex. Bravo provided current information from the planet of music, movie and television. In the mediate were published interviews with well-known people, crosswords, advice department, competitions, photostores, horoscopes, movie and serial descriptions, fashion department, posters and others.And there is no Polish culture in the media, you have pop culture!
Same as any another magazine: Pan, Playboy, women's magazines - they were focused on a certain kind of man and female and this kind constantly showed as attractive, and another types simply ignored, not that they ridiculed - it was adequate that they ignored.
If they were all promoting - simply including in their publications - the household type, there would be no problem with demography today.
It is as done, as with the leaching of Polishness from Poles - deliberate negation of Polish culture in the media (can be shown) result in the extinction of Polishness in young generations.
This was done once, this Polishness, simply through contact with the Polish culture, which all Pole carried in his heart, now this culture is not in massmedia, its place has taken up the show, games and dance games, business magazines, bigbraders, films, music videos, amusement music, advertising nonstop, tv shows about nothing, tv shows teaching children that you can assault a friend, collect from him hard work and bear no consequences, horoscopes, advice on how to spin ass, fashion, how to promote, So I don't gotta work. etc., etc.... there are no household patterns - this thought dies in people due to the fact that the amount of information pouring out of the mass media overwhelms the family.
Count which portals, which newspapers, e.g. were not interested The political situation in Poland, as they ignored all the time what the Coalition was doing on 13 December - they don't care that they are smashing the PKP, that they are destroying people, that they are making abroad engineers enter - they are only curious in profit and chatter about business.
Young people think about everything, but not about family, due to the fact that they are forced to do it instagram and facebook and tv - due to the fact that people are turned into Way to earn - due to the fact that individual in the planet wants to make as much money as possible, you must be busy buying things all the time, including the lifestyle you gotta buy things for and all over again...
No good pattern and time filling with amusement and circumstantial models - patterns in which there is no family
That's the reason.
A government of souls - not a deficiency of money.
The news says divorces look like this:
And a small print says it's: ratio of divorces to marriages per year
It's spelled wrong, it should be, no."how many pairs in %"but "indicator"so it's confusing erstwhile individual fails to read exactly... People in Poland don't read with knowing - sure, how is it mauled and gibberish in all another newspaper?!
It truly looks like Polish magazines are occupied by a sieve of gibberish editors who do not inform citizens about something, but pretend to do so by posting gibberish!!
This is not the first case shown on this blog! Does anyone too me show these things, discuss, straighten and brand, publicize?
Last year, 66,000 couples broke up in 181 1000 relationships. This means that the divorce rate (i.e. their ratio to recently married couples) was 36.4 percent.
The first crisis usually comes 3-5 years after the wedding. The couple then realize that the wedding due to the bride’s pregnancy is not a adequate reason to support the family. There are besides betrayals, where sexual neglect with your spouse becomes an excuse.
Look! Again! "Sex disorder"!!! (i.e. this... see the subject of another movie described below)
It all worked out like a glove, a broken bed, a beat-up sink, and then it turned out to be sexual abuse !! What a wonder!!!
Factors that lead most to divorce have always existed. However, as a consequence of the moral changes associated with the household model More and more people decide to break with tradition and life to date. - People started putting force on implementation their own needs, autonomy, individualisation of elections and independency in the relation – explains Prof. Henryk Domański, sociologist from the Polish Academy of Sciences.
That's precisely what it's been about for 30 years in these magazines and movies: rich education from large cities burning like rabbits. Right?
They're all young, beautiful, rich, independent... right? The movie script will take everything...
And most people do not keep up with the trend: they are inactive not rich, they are besides different with beauty, even though the gym, headphones, smartphones and autonomy means - no strings attached.
There's what's on the screen in life...
Were there kids on the "Friends" show?
Once there was a small kid, it turns out that individual on the street of those 2 Chendler and the another one, what he did there... took for gays with a kid... it wasn't random that all this happened, not accidentally...
This is all planned and step by step very slow implemented.
However, as a consequence moral changes related to the household model More and more people decides to break with tradition And life to date.
It's written like Breaking From Tradition It was a individual decision or even a resolution.
People don't decide to break up with tradition, only take the attitude they are dealing with around them! Tradition just dies...
Tradition is this
«totality of customs, norms, views, behaviours etc. applicable to any social group, passed from generation to generation; and: continuity of these customs, norms, views or behaviours»
Since the media changes all the customs, norms and views to those that are different from those that were in force in my mother's generation, people begin to apply them.
If the media did not advance lgtb and dog, etc., people would have maintained customs adopted by parents and surroundings - that was the case for thousands of years ... in Poland we have traditions of at least 20,000 years or more and can show it, but who is aware of it...
If the media were to advance conventional behavior, as in my mother's generation, today's generations would be the same as the erstwhile generations.
Children, youth learn social norms, customs, views, behaviours by imitating parents and surroundings!
Parents have an influence on the kid and the immediate environment besides - but the media, too, due to the fact that they belong to the immediate surroundings - tv always hangs in the surviving area at the central point, smartphone and net are always on the move...
If the media is 1 100 times over the influence of parents and the immediate surroundings, and above, due to the fact that radio stations, tv stations and net portals produce gigabytes of baloney,
this child, youth begins to adopt and apply standards from the media, not from parents - simply, media "wins" for the amount and frequency of the message.
More and more people Lltb, "fashion" on the dog, etc. are the effects of media influence.As many as 100,000 words, 74 GB of data – that's what our brain processes all day according to calculations. A fewer 100 years ago, this amount of information reached a man for... a lifetime! It is not surprising, then, that stimulation has become a real problem, with a number of physical and intellectual consequences.
For the Future of Mankind
ON MEDIA, YOU request TO PUT ON A KAGANIC - MOST authoritative ...
According to the expert, the fact that people are divorced twice as many with mediate and professional education as higher education results from education and, consequently, from a wider worldview of educated people and greater skills of pairing. "The unions force compromises, and they require tolerance and knowledge," explains Prof. Domański.
Maybe they don't look on your tv that much.
In addition, this paper shows in the image that from certain countries - grey, I would say - no data...
And look here: here's the data... divorces per 1000 inhabitants - and they are different from in Europe and not suitable for the nuanced thesis for Poles, that The planet is divorcing itself...
In a news newspaper, 1.5 billion people in India, hundreds of millions of people in Africa, it's not the "world," it's the "gray zone" without data.
Africa is the second largest continent in the planet and it is inhabited by over 1.4 billion people, which accounts for about 17% of the world's population - but in the news it is adequate to compose "no data" And then the divorce thesis "for power" match - And it's consistent with the objectives of the nuance...
comment on divorces
I'm sorry.
Marriages proved to be the most enduring in India (1.5 billion people - MS)
A given planet of statistic may seem a lot to blame, but they find partial support in another reports on the same subject
I'm certain many of you are now asking yourself if the planet of statistic data is credible at all. It is worth mentioning that the profile does not trust on any circumstantial study. Fortunately, the origin of the data was found by vigilant netizens who added context to the information. Turns out The data came from Wikipedia. The results of individual countries come from different years and have been taken from rather a variety of sources. For the countries of the European Union this is primarily Eurostat, for others local equivalents of the Polish Central Statistical Office are the source.
If this is not enough, the percent of divorces should be understood as the ratio of divorces made to marriages concluded in a given year. Theoretically, if people get divorced more frequently in a country than they get married, this rate could exceed 100%. His advanced score does not should be due to highly frequent divorces, but besides to a tiny number of marriages.
At the same time, however, it should be mentioned that another reports on this subject either confirm planet of statistic data or come from precisely the same source. A good example here is this year's study by the German ABCD agency, in which the most likely divorce occurs. It covers 100 countries and takes into account not only our divorce rate, but besides what part of the population will be divorced in the next 12 months.
This time the undisputed winner is Russia, where during the year 1 adult individual on 172 will be affected by divorce. Next in this ranking are post-Soviet and Communist states: Belarus, Moldova, Kazakhstan, China, Ukraine and Russia. Poland took 60th place.
Spain didn't look so bad due to the fact that it was 51st. Portugal ranked 41. High, due to the fact that in 21st place, is Iran. possibly the practice of temporary marriages is besides included here? Persistent Marriages in Change
(India - 1.5 billion people - MS)
You gotta talk about children in the media, and you gotta talk warm and responsible, not something about "bubbles"... These are people, not "bubbles."
Notice, the same inconsistency as in another subjects, as I have already emphasized on the blog:
- children are au, due to the fact that "Take our freedom..."but if gays want to have a baby then "Oh, how great... how wonderful."
- "Bombel free zones!" - "Can't I bring a dog into a diner? You Nazi! That's my dog.!!"
- I'm sorry. "Bombel free zones!", but young people are free, young people may request that the school be as they imagine - classes from 9 to 14th, zero homework, 1 reading a year - preferably "Glass from the deck of Ida" due to the fact that it has only 40 pairs of pages..., can "pick", go to rainbow parades and stick to asphalt
- I'm sorry. "Bombel free zones!"But effort to just say "Lltb-free zones!"
- I'm sorry. balls You can talk, but effort utilizing the word pedal...
- withBelieved: "Oh, oh, they feel!!", don't the kids?
- and the vulva wants to breathe!
What????!!!
facebook.com/reel/1279182723838128
I realize the method - i.e. in addition to the usage of emotional language, they anthropomorphize (humanize) vulva, dog, cat... and then everything can be told to people, due to the fact that if vulva wants to breathe (although it's not lungs), then surely and feels and thoughts - it has consciousness, you can see dogs and cats and oxes besides feel and think... just like people...
vulva wants to breathe (although it's not the lungs)And the lungs want to breathe? They do!
That's what you say sometimes, so, yes, they do!
and you see, that is, we have a comparison in 1 speech (srom and lungs), where in relation to the lungs we can say that they "want to breathe" - specified a phrase functions in circulation (poority) - so that specified comparison matches vulva with "breathing" lungs, that is,
lungs are "humanized" a long time ago, it compares vulva with lungs - now we humanize vulva, i.e. we give it human characteristics, due to the fact that if there is: wanting, that besides feeling and thinkingBecause it involves wanting[like the concept] "little country" is associated with the concept nation...and then small nation...and then small alien nation... until yet A tiny alien nation that wants to separate from you ... - MS]
That's the point. Although it's not the lungs."Humanity" vulva - and now this vulva will decide what's good and what's not, and not you... that's the communicative from next year?
That's why the vulva was followed by this attention to the lungs.
Notice that the phrase (although it's not the lungs) was not said spontaneous - It was a scheduled statement.
Notice what this is about - the natural thing in case of a deficiency of hygiene, etc. is highlighted and exported to extraordinary sizes - "kiss" - why do they do it?
"quick" "dry" and "cracking"
Are all these videos
It's not a coincidence, it's like a method for lgtb-- the same thing.
They talk about it all the time. There's no another content in your life.
It's not, due to the fact that they own the media and there's what they want.
And remember - those words are not directed at you - but to the another woman who sits there,
You're just listening, listening to individual else's private conversation on different subjects.
And it's your business if you soak it or apply it...
"in my opinion"
So they treat people like children - see the table below - in fairy tales besides animals are like people, talk and think (Bugs rabbit - bugs This errors in English, raven and fox in a cheese fairy tale, genetically modified raccoon from the movie Avengers: Game over etc.) and tell us that animals are like people not only in fairy tales....
I remind you that bubbles, that's besides something that's only a moment, and then flies off or breaks and it's gone...
Children are taken distant from the right to exist, the right to life, the right to average functioning, the right to express themselves, and animals defend themselves like independence. Everything's on your mind... because?
Because it depends on who wants to accomplish what goals - and these Objectives are pursued by MEDIA.
Who's "who"?
Let's keep going... so
The intent of these assembled videos is young girls.
How do you believe that - in those nicely served bullshits, and in the 40s ("half your life second") You'll realize it was programming - it might be besides late! And for you and all of us!
White powder, flowery dress, painted lips, prostitutes and Krzysztof Piesiewicz - they are heroes movies that were never meant to see the light of day. In order to do so, Senator PO paid prostitutes who, he claims, blackmailed him with a advanced sum of money. Even half a million zlotys are involved. For compromising recordings But he arrived and published them "Super Express".
They destruct not man, but trust in men.
The mark wasn't Piesiewicz, it was you.
You, the full society, were the targets. This society was expected to respond according to their plan, according to their concept.
And how many videos have never seen the light of day, and why? Have you thought about it?
What's that? always chooses the youngest - He doesn't have videos?
And similarly, it is crucial to see the celebrity case on a journey to Dubai - it was definitely planned and prepared for years, it was a conspiracy, but not individual who wanted to earn, but a conspiracy of services - a individual with a certain position in society was specially selected and worked for this purpose.
In the traditionally understood function of women in society - AND THE FAMILY.
"Hell, honest."
The name suggests honesty and truth, but with any proposition that any dark forces are behind it...
key words:
"for me"
word "arguments" is unambiguous - arguments, it is something real and final - unchanging
Or should there be a reason in that sentence?Because if there's a fight, a disagreement, there are reason for the argumentas regards destruction of the relationship, termination - you gotta have arguments Oh, my God!
It is only this woman that sees situations in a relationship, do not apply them to yourself!!!
Let us remember what is mentioned in this statement, in these "advises":
"DLE ME"!!! These words given at the beginning of the film, at the beginning of the speech, mention to the full speech!!!
"it's not like I want to finish you off"
!!!
The movie is composed of parts, selected by individual short statements and they are combined into 1 message - these moments of merging are marked with a word Cut
Basic For me A successful relation is that we sit and sit other each other, we know that we care and that we play for 1 goal (see: gestures affect the senses - agitation may make you miss something, any content...)And it's not like I'm trying to kill you. And he wants to finish me off. And we hunt each another now, collecting arguments. And that's precisely what sex talks are about.
That if it's in our common interest that this part of our lives be successful, we'll be They had to dare.To talk about it.
video cut
It's besides hard to realize that, for example, we don't get along.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
And it's not like people go to bed first and then live together? And at the level of playing and getting to know each other, they either get together or they don't? So what's the movie about?
Because from those words, it's like people are making love, surviving together, and then it turns out they don't "groom" in bed.
What's "not a match"? From further arguments it follows that: "As a consequence of fatigue"
"because individual is tired?"???????????
Well, physically tired can be, can happen sometimes, but fatigue doesn't mean no match.
In addition, it's like there's a turn of phrase...
It's besides hard to realize that e.g. We're not gonna get along.
It's not the same as:
It is besides hard to realize that e.g. We don't get along sometimes.
Sometimes!
Language matters !!
"we won't get along with anyone." - it MEANS ALWAYS!!! we will always fail!!!
"we don't get along sometimes." - Sometimes, this time, in any case, man... I ran into a weird guy!!!! This time it didn't work out!!!!
It's hard to realize sometimes too. If individual doesn't realize something, they don't realize it anymore, which means they'll never realize it, not at all. Sometimesadults usually realize everything
This is the movie put against the Union!!!
And now, if It's an crucial component for us, and for most (eye thrown into the sky - failure of eye contact - does he not want to look into the eyes of the interviewer? denial?), I think the people are, however,
video cut
This It won't solve itself.
Now, if you have individual on the another side who has much little needs than you, or a full different preference.
Cut
What the relation could be full OTHER preferences???
How come people are in a relation and have sex? FULL Another view????????
And again the key word - in fact the phrase: "It won't solve itself."
So you're the psychologist(?) suggesting what?
"solution" problem, or "resolve a relationship"?
If people have full OTHER - possibly one's gay and the another isn't? - I'm sorry. Of course, it's the only sensible step, the explanation is to "solve a relationship," only then this statement about - There's no point
because how people with different orientations can be in a relation (not in front of a relationship) and it is so that "we sit and sit other each other, we know that we care and that we play for 1 goal" ? ?
It's about brainwashing. "it won't solve itself" !!! And of course - lgtb...
"we sit and sit other each other, we know that we care and that we play for 1 goal" It means, rather, that in a relation everything is fine and buzzing! [I originally wrote: roaring...] - MS]
Such films are made up of selected phrases, if in wikipedia or articles the phrases are embedded in the text, where I choice them out and give them to you, here we have them elevated to the surface and given directly.
again,
It won't happen magically.
If for that person, her being what she is, she's okay, you can't change that.
Cut
If for this person, being what she is, it's okay, you can't change that.
That last conviction is weird, I think it's just the phrase: "you can't change her." and possibly lgtb, and if so:
If for this person, being what she is, it's okay, you can't change that.
I gotta think about precisely what this is about, possibly it's just a kind of summary of the full thing that says: You better not even start a relationship, because, you know, There will be no magic, due to the fact that it's a lie, but there'll be any problems you'll gotta solve because "It won't solve itself."
As a consequence of fatigue, stimulation, individual may not have the strength, may not have the desire.
This is besides a frequently emerging subject about men having erectile dysfunction. Well, they do, 'cause they're tired due to the fact that they're excited due to the fact that it gets porn,
That's why they watch porn? Don't watch it!!
which at the phase erstwhile they are looking for a partner, frequently besides causes this ability to later be with a female actually close
Cut
She's based on a completely different principle.
Cut
But again, the question of intent, empathy, that To communicate
Really close? She assumes that people in a relation can live close in a fake way?
The porn thread - note, is ungrammatically embedded in the conviction - the porn thread is included in 1 passage, "on 1 breath" - 'cause they're excited due to the fact that it gets to porn., mentioned together with the present problems (because "they are tired" - present time) sounds rather unambiguous - like "porno viewed during the relationship"
In the meantime, it's like it's something else, pre-union porn.
the ability to later be with a female actually close Cut is based on completely different principles.
What?
Again:
Well, they do, due to the fact that they're tired due to the fact that they're excited due to the fact that there's porn, which, at the phase erstwhile they're looking for a partner, frequently besides causes this ability to later be with a female actually close.
This conviction is like torn and infinite and by this There's no point, but the full movie consists of sentences ripped out of context, so if anything, it doesn't fall apart, although this extended conviction is rather whole,
Notice - again a highly developed sentence, a statistical individual will remember the last 5 words or phrases - inactive depends on how long, that is, listening to the statements - understands the 5 words utilized together, let's calculate the phrases separated by commas...
Noma, they're tired, they're stimulated, due to the fact that they get there.
She's been talking so long and so long - and she doesn't halt reasoning you're about to forget what she's after, so erstwhile the word "porno" comes out, you think that's what she meant.
There's five-- so I get these together, and I look at the remainder as a different theme, and that's why we get the porn subject as a relation taker, not something before a relationship.
It's like making problems under certain scheduled phrases to fall off the screen.
For them to die, you gotta have a reason, so they're so elaborate and so on...
It won't solve itself.
It's been 4 days since the above... After the action, we have a reaction - And there's a fresh video, this time alternatively of sensual women in full bloom of their femininity we have 2 vulgar caramboules racing, which is simply a bigger soft fuck...
What a filthy language teachers, couchs, mentors, trainers of individual Development, theatre scientists, philologists, doctoralians, journalisticians, writers, and not!
It's the KU...ura department in the W!!!
So what's the game about?
"We have everything to win and nothing to lose"
Two in one... and that paw...
When do you make specified a motion erstwhile you want to control the situation?
Things have come so far...
Don't forget:
They have nothing to lose due to the fact that the stakes are so high.
We Poles - we have everything to win.
And they'll lose everything.
agakozak.com/page
== sync, corrected by elderman == @elder_man
Educational publications WIKING - Educational portal - DEMOGRAPHY in the World
List of countries by natural growth - Wikipedia, free encyclopedia
pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo
newsweek.pl/Polish/divorce-world-divorce-se-on-potege-a-polacy-map-newsweekpl/hfnj984
sjp.pwn.pl/slur/tradition.html
* Oh, my God *
Of course, this conviction is absolutely true, for example, erstwhile a single female watches a movie in a movie and for 2 hours forgets her own problems - 1 can say that she is happy then... for 2 hours.
