German colonisation

maciejsynak.blogspot.com 2 weeks ago

Demography is simply a weapon.

The intent of colonization is always to take control of the territory.

A German map showing the German-speaking population in Central east Europe outside the German state in 1925 - whether the data is actual is questionable, but... in politics what the map is for, not whether it is telling the truth...

I heard specified information on the net that there were about 15 to 30 1000 people surviving in the hub country, and it inspired me to describe my thoughts.

sources of information below are mainly wikipedia
I remind you: all these texts carefully clogged can be written by Ai

1. Known Colonization

- Colonization on German law (based on German law) – a socio-economic phenomenon that took place in Central and east Europe from the 12th to 14th centuries. It consisted of the planned settlement of the population coming mainly from western Germany.

This colonization was carried out under separate agreements specifying the rights and obligations of the colonists, which were concluded between you (the landowner) and a group of settlers represented by the perpetrator. In Poland, it has developed since the beginning of the 13th century with the influx of free population groups from the West (in German), bringing with them the foundations of a fresh settlement law, developed subsequently into a legal strategy called German law.

It's an encyclopedic version of what the reality was, we don't know exactly. In any case, the sword frequently dictated the law.

I utilized to have this thought about Poland in the old days, that there were voids, impenetrable forests, and any villages of peaceful towns...

Then I added to this image evil and greedy robbers of German - monks, and besides worldly masters who oppressed defenseless peasants and under the threat of the sword forced tributes on them....

The knight at a gathering with the people shows them a book and says:
You know what I have here?
And this is simply a secret book containing prescriptions of various kinds, and this book is called the "Treaty of Rabo..." which means... this... this... is eating my Legion, understand?
And now, by virtue of my papers and teams of noble knights here, celebrated all over the world, and girded all day with iron and passiment, I say to you, clogs:

- if you want to fish in MY stream - about that - you gotta carry any of the catch to me, but you are not allowed to fish more than 2 fat men, 2 pikes and a day of glue (or a fence) for 7 days. Understand? due to the fact that this... due to the fact that I have all the fish shaggy...and I've got 12......twelve... Twelve... I got a twelve kids! You gotta live off something, right?

And 10 percent to me... understand?

And who does? our agreement He will break - it is simply a friend of our holy spirit, magnificent and world-famous, and it has shown you our iron and it will take distant everything and nothing will happen to you, realize the Belarusian countryside?

Then I made any observations, and now I think about it differently. I mean, yeah.

If there were emptiness, that means that all the animals and fish in the rivers, the lakes were on kicks - like those bad robbers - who didn't have much at all - controlled these blunders, didn't they, like, catch your fish all day?

After all, the rivers of the plural, what was that probation officer standing on the shore all day, looking for individual without approval to throw the net? He's been watching all day? That's stupid... you can't watch it.

I know that historians will deny me, and too - I don't know myself, I just hypothesize myself, but I think that our lands in the old ages, from the period of, for example, the Piast States, were actually rather populated - at least as in the 17th century.

According to scientists, there were about 30,000 people surviving in the Hub country. (see: movie approx. 1h and 7 minutes) or: 1.5 million...

Today, in order to fish, you gotta have a permit, and they gotta have a permit... so what's the difference between these times?

If present in Poland there were unharmed forests, would you gotta ask individual for approval to fish? surely not. Would it make sense to establish a law that everyone - or almost everyone - would be able to circumvent? They'd just be laughing...

How are these times different from each other?

I say there were quite a few people then - a lot more than the historians say. There were so many of them, that there was a sense of issuing permits (grants) for fishing, and there was individual to "watch".

The last sturgeon in Poland was extinct in the 1960s.

I'm not going to play maps with the Livers, I'll just take Pomerania as an example.

Here's a map from the website: maps.amzp.pl/tk25.cgi?11,36,50,103

map of Pomerania No. 1 broken down by mapsheet

and for comparison of territory (yellow and grey) where 120 years ago there were 3.4 million people

map of Pomerania No. 2

In 1905 Pomorze state had about 1.68 million inhabitants, and in 1910 there were about 1.7 million people ~ 3.4 million people surviving in Western Prussia.

In the territory shown on map 1 present lives:

in Pomeranian Voivodeship 2.3 million people, in Zachodniopomorskie 1.6 million + 650 1000 with kuj-pom. + 325 1000 Wielkopolska + 46 1000 from Lubuskie = 4.92 million people.

And under the regulation of Prussia there were 1/3 of them less, i.e. about : 3.4 million. I number everything so roughly.

Map 1 is Pomerania divided into maps - these sheets are, how easy to calculate, approx. 500. Each sheet of the map covers a section of the territory about 11x11 km, we click e.g. sheet No. 1961 and we have this view:

in the corner of the map the city of Białogard (wikipedia: The area was incorporated into the Polish state by Mieszko I c. 967)

river on the left is Parsley, Radew runs on the sheet slant

And now let's number the largest towns we see here - how many people they presently have.

Whitegard - 24 1000 inhabitants - in 1890 it was 7000

Karlino - 5600 (for comparison the full municipality: 9300)

Lubiechowo - 253

Redlino - 288

Dashevo - 284

Courier - 190

Lulewice - 166 (after the 30 Years' War in the mid-17th Century, the village was inhabited by 83 people)

Parsovo - 304

Shine - 260

Together he gives: 31 345 people

That is, about as much as lived in the full country Lives I.

We have here a map of the bellow prey:

The area described by the red line is about 4x larger than Pomerania- and there lived 30,000 people????

I presume that's the area you mean, prof. Izdebski... I don't know if I understood the message correctly - possibly I didn't... According to the professor's research, (see link: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2409056122 ) This area can be even 2x larger.

Of course, to catch a circumstantial one, we would gotta number each of these 500 sheets separately.

And then you could offer something - possibly I'll number 1 day?

Or else:

Let's go look for any silver,

31,345 multiply x 500 sheets and we get about 16 million people... 3 times besides many, due to the fact that nearly 5 million live in Pomerania - that's different:

So let's divide today's 5 million into 500 -- we get 10,000 people into each sheet -- of course, it doesn't break down like that, but it gives us any average...

Based on this remark recorded in Lulewice, I presume that in the 17th - 19th century, half of today's population lived in villages and throughout the territory. I do this: I take 7,000 for Białogard and half from another towns, or even less:

7+2.5+ 873 = approx. 10 350 people.

So what, the 19th - 17th century was about 10,000 people in the vicinity of Białogard?

And the average present - 10,000 - a akin value...

It's most likely in German statistic somewhere...

I think that in the mediate Ages there may have been at least half the state of the 19th century, or about 5 000 people - but for safety reasons it will divide this value by 3 and accept 1000 people.

So this square of 11x11 km could have been inhabited 1000 people - then it makes sense to impose taxes?

And now we're going to number 30,000 people in the full region of bellow...

Pomerania is about 4x smaller area: 30,000 / 4 = 7.5 1000 people in Pomerania.

Divide by 500 sheets = 15 people per sheet map.

See that green square?

There are 15 people surviving there - 3 families sitting in the woods...

How are you going to taxation them and ban them from fishing in the river with 3,000 guns?

You don't really know about them...

In my opinion, there were a lot more people.

Hyperborea wasn't any kind of deafness, it was all step built, organized, full of people's territory.

== sync, corrected by elderman == @elder_man

The first information about the military strength of the Polan state comes from the account of Ibrahim ibn James, published in the 11th century chronicle of the Book of Roads and Kingdoms of the Spanish author Al-Bekri. Ibrahim describing the country, identified with the State of Lóż I, he determined the numbers of the warriors of the Prince there for 3,000 men. According to his account, these warriors remained under the sole care of the prince, who cared for their weapons, provided means of surviving and paid wages.

Gall Anonym's 12th century chronicle gives information on the size and deployment of Bolesław Chrobry's armed forces. According to the chronicler, the squad was primarily stationed in the main castles of the principality – Gniezno, Poznań, Włocławek and Giecz. full 13,000 shields and 3,900 armored, Although the author of the chronicle points out that in order to [...] spare the tedious calculation, he mentions only the wars stationed in the main centres.

Territory 4x larger than Pomerania - 30,000 people:

War Lives ~ 20,000 - how 10k people fed nearly 20k troops? But possibly the shields are just a peasant being picked up to fight? Let it be 3,000 armed - how did they control and enforce taxes in specified a large territory?

If I'm making a mistake somewhere, correct me.

In my opinion, permanent population density in a given territory was about constant throughout history and in medieval Poland around 1400 was close from 1700 to 1900. It's just that people kind of "close" settled everything they could, and then they went on.

It is safe to accept - 1/3 of this value, i.e. in the case of the vicinity of Białogard - about 1000 people.

x 500 sheets = 500,000 in Pomerania x 4 = approx. 2 million in the country Lives.

Two to six million.

On History.org.pl write:

The State of Housing I consisted of Wielkopolska, Małopolska, Silesia, Mazovia, Pomerania and Sieradsko-Łęczycka land. In total, it was about 250 1000 km2. In the year 1000, at the beginning of the reign of Bolesław Chrobry, before the era of his conquests, Poland had about 1.25 million inhabitants.

In 1350 the population of the state was about 2 million people.

Around 1500 it was inhabited by about 3.8 million inhabitants.

That's like I hit it.

But I truly don't.

According to this page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_country_by_population_in_1000

In the year 1000 it was like this:

Holy Roman Empire - 11-12 million
Kingdom of France - 7 million
Rus Kiev - 5.4 million
Bulgarian Empire - 2 million
The Principality of Hungary - 2 million

Kingdom of England - 2 million
Poland - 1 million

Czech Republic - 0.9 million

W The Czech Republic was as many people as in 4x Poland? Why would they go up there like that?

Now, individual explain to me why the CESARTY of about 10 million people, alternatively of simply conquering 1 million people in Poland, was utilizing any Lisice or another Mouse?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Bohemia

The Duchy of Bohemia - 0.9 million people - must have been 4 million in Poland... or 6... since there were 7...

In my opinion, something's incorrect here, but I don't know...

An ancient cartographer and traveler - possibly the West... or the South...

Al-Idrisi (Arab. الإدريسي ; born 1100 in Ceuta, amended 1166),

formerly besides Edrisi, actually Abu Abd Allah Muhammad al-Idrisi – Arabic cartographer, geographer and traveller operating at the court of King of Sicily Roger II.

In 1138 the king commissioned al-Idris to make a geographical description of the planet containing all cognition of the location of countries, rivers, mountains, cities, and roads of the planet known, and to present it on the Earth's map in a flat throw. He completed this task after 15 years, in 1154, creating a large map of the planet with a confederate orientation, called the Book of Roger (Lat. Tabula Rogerian or Tabula Idrisiana). The geographer besides included information about Poland, which he called Buluniia (from Latin Polonia – Poland), listing its major cities, including Kraków, Gniezno, Wrocław, Sieradz, Łęczyca and Santok.

"As for the earth B(u)luniia, which is simply a country of cognition and Romanian sages (ar-Rum), we have mentioned it before. It is simply a land of beautiful land, fruitful, rich in springs and rivers, about endless provinces and large cities, rich in villages and homes... It has vineyards, olives and multiple trees of various species of fruit. His cities include: Ikraku, G(i)nazna, -r(a)t(i)-slaba, S(i)rad(i)ja, N(u)grada, S(i)tnu.

They are all celebrated capitals and strong centres, where the abundance of various countries is gathered. They besides enjoy respect due to the fact that they include scholars educated in discipline and acquainted with their profession. As regards the city (I)kraku, the city of G(i)na and the remainder of it (Bulunji) mentioned cities, These are towns close to each other. "

From all sides it is surrounded by mountains that proceed to proceed and separate it from the country of S(a)sun(i)ja (Saxonia), the country of B(u)amija (Bohemia=Czech Republic) and the country of ar-Rusija (Rus).

and further on:

- colonization during the war

2. Unknown colonization

- population change:

* secretly carried out during the war

* secretly realized after the war

Information for money.pl

Nearly 300,000 Germans left their homeland in 2024 and returned from the lands - 190 000

in 2010 - 140 000

As of 2020 - 260 000 per year

Direction: German-speaking countries and others.

And what if they're coming down to Ukraine, let's say they get documents, identities, from dead citizens?

Did you hear the word "great substitution" for replacing Europeans with African or Asian visitors? Well, that was most likely all time - from ancient Greece to today's Germany...

But the fact that earlier the Civilization of Death moves to a fresh country nobody says...

Below is an analysis of the 2022 article on reparations for Poland for planet War II - from Germany, which appeared immediately after the government announced that the study is ready and we will request these reparations.

In this full "business" article below, there are a fewer sentences highlighted with fat, mainly concerning amounts, GDP and such, outside of them is just this 1 "non-business" sentence:

"Germany believes the reparations have already settled"

My highlightsIn color.

text was briefly treated, the full in the link at the end of the post

reprint

Businessinsider.com.pl

PLN 6220 billion of reparations from Germany. This is how much Polish GDP, debt, export

Jacek Frączyk
1 September 2022, 14:20

The demolition of Poland was huge, the largest of all countries affected by planet War II. Germany believes that the reparations have paid off, the Polish government has a different opinion. The amount is staggering and amounts to PLN 6220 billion. We've converted it to data from our economy.

The amount of reparations expected by the Polish government is 35 percent of German GDP

It is essential that the reparations are regulated. Germany says yes, Polish page points to crucial legal flaws in the decision of years ago

Do they belong or don't they?

30 scientists worked on the report: historians, economists and property experts. 10 reviewers were besides hired. The full case was led by the Parliamentary Panel on the Assessment of the Heights of Compensation due to Poland from Germany during planet War II, chaired by PiS MP Arkadiusz Mularczyk.So-called"invoice for Germany" is to be the basis for demanding war reparations.

The fundamental question is whether the reparations have been paid or not, due to the fact that Germany has a completely different opinion.

– No German government would agree to this – he was to hear from 1 of German politicians Jarosław Kaczyński.

Germany considers that the reparations have already been regulated.They indicate that PRL was to quit reparationin 1953 and 1970. However, Poland acknowledgesthat it was a step forced by the USSR and thus deprived of legal power. Additionally, the 1953 waiver itself had crucial legal defects. The resignation could be made by the Council of State and the decision was taken by the Presidency of the Government. And yet there is no paper to confirm the government's decision, not Bolesław Bierut himself.

“I must say that it is very clearly indicated in the legal layer that Germany’s compensation liability in no way expired, that the declaration made in 1953 (renunciation from the PRL government in 1953 - PAP) had at least 3 crucial legal flaws, that is where it is desirable,” said Szymon Szymon Szynkowski, deputy chief of the MFA, after reading the report.

As the diary late wrote "Die Welt", in the 1945 Post-Potdam Agreement, the 4 victorious powers agreed that the russian Union would receive compensation from the russian business region (Eastern Germany). "The government in Warsaw, however, argues that Poland had to compensate for its share of coal supplies to the russian Union. In addition, Western countries specified as France and the Netherlands have been treated much better," he emphasised. "Die Welt".
The German national government is presently in the position that the issue of reparation for Poland was legally and politically closed during the conference 2 plus 4 of 1990," he wrote. "Die Welt".
"However, the issue of reparation has not been explicitly mentioned in the treaty between the national Republic of Germany, the GDR and the 4 erstwhile business powers: the USA, the russian Union, France and the United Kingdom," he noted. "Die Welt".
In Germany, publications on the subject operated between 800 billion and 2 trillion euros. However, German society is convinced that even if Poles made any claims, they would have no legal basis.

Jacek Frączyk
journalist, private father of six children

--------

Government in Warsaw - remember that they undermine our borders... the existence of our country.

The editor writes:

Germany believes that the reparations have paid off, the Polish government has a different opinion.

Germany argues that yes, the Polish side points to crucial legal defects of the decision of years ago

No German government will agree to that.

Germany considers that the reparations have already been regulated. They indicate that the PRL was to quit reparation in 1953 and 1970. However, the Polish side acknowledges...

or:

"Germany considers"

"Germany claims"

"Germany considers"

"Polish government has a different opinion"

"Polish side"

"Polish website"

The way I see it:

In German it is written unambiguously and ultimately, with Poland the comment is ambiguous and shows as if the bias of the Polish position, the word "page" can be associated with individual - that is, the Polish position is biased, that is, the NOT-BIE, is written with a finger on the water and is "be!".

We remember this:Werwolf: 8. tiny sabotage – Werwolf's basic method ?

‘from the submission of the various parties to the determination of the circumstances’

“The first side will be a collective hero – witnesses.”

"The second hero is, let's call it, the German side,"

“The 3rd organization is Polish publications....”

What do we see?

Because I see that the German side is simply a hero. I don't know why, but that's what it says. Witnesses and Poles are a party, Germany – a hero. Subliminal information?

A large example of tiny sabotage – there is no way to prove it, but there is something about it....

The full text describes the substance of reparation as something unobvious, for example in the full article is only 1 sentence, which mentions that Poland is making claims, but besides in a conjecture

expected by the Polish government of reparations

The full article concerns the case Polish claims, not alleged Polish claims, but the editor treats them all the time as "presumed", utilizing terms specified as:

PLN 6220 billion of reparations from Germany.

This is how much Polish GDP, debt, export

If the amount were transferred to the Polish budget,
PLN 6220 billion – what does this amount look like for the Polish economy?
would be
How's that for export?
So-called

just all the time "if," he writes around subject, not erstwhile writing straight e.g.:

"Poland demands PLN 6220 billion from Germany for damages for planet War II"

In simplification, this could be described as follows:

"Germans are told, Poland - thesis"

Ai:
"The claims are proven logical sentences describing facts", and
"Thesis is the main claim, presumption or opinion of the author, which requires justification (success) by means of arguments"

These claims are facts, a
These are thesis opinions individual - and with opinions we don't gotta count...

So according to the editor, Germany shows the facts and the "Polish side" - its opinion, although in fact it is precisely the opposite:

The Polish side presents a law-based position, and Germany repeats false opinions about what would have been in post-war years.

The fact that the committee was established and executed for 5 years of calculations, study and obtaining a circumstantial amount proves that Poland will request a reparation, and yet the editor treats the full event as if it is not certain whether it will happen.

He then presents (repeats behind Germany) the German position expressed in the German paper - which is according to the interests of Germany (refuses reparation) - and yet comments from himself:

However, German society is convinced that even if Poles made any claims, they would have no legal basis.

And again, About German society 1 SIGNIFICALLY, about Poles - in fantasy mode - and to the 4th power...:

is convinced

Even if they put out some

Here's 4 "conjections":

even

pushedby

some

How does the editor know what belief German society has? He cites us as a newspaper, or German government, alternatively than a society.

"convincing the German society" does not mention to the "legal basis" - whether claims are legitimate under the law - decide facts and paragraphs, not public opinion. So why is the editor not writing on the subject?

Polish claims state: "even if the Poles put out some" putting these words in the mouth of German society - without citing any data or origin in this regard, so whose opinion is that? Him? Where did he get them?

He writes all the time in conjecture - on 5 words, 4 mention to speculation, whether any situation might happen - "even if the Poles put out some" - and so - as if there were no claims so far - but the study just How can you compose like that?

This text is so written that individual not acquainted with the subject will realize only 1 thing - "we're gonna get a rep."

What happens if a poller calls him and asks him decently prepared questions, for example:

The German society is convinced that the reparations were paid in the 1960s and Poland has no legal basis for claims, even if it wanted to. What do you think:

Even if Poles make any claims, will they fail?

1. It is essential that the reparations are regulated. The Germans say yes. What do you think:

Do they deserve it or don't they?

2. No German government will agree to that. What do you think:

Is the alleged "facture for Germany" going to do anything?

3. The question is whether they have already been paid, due to the fact that Germany has a very different opinion. What do you think: The Germans believe the reparations have been settled?

4. However, German society is convinced that even if Poles made any claims, they would have no legal basis.

And then you see the posters in the papers saying they don't want to and wondering how they got here...

I have a strong impression that your editor is not curious in Polish matters, Polish interests, or even the future of Poland. And he has six children, and Mikke has 8 children - what future awaits them? Who will they be and what will they do here? You know who's interested?

You.

It seems that neither editors nor politicians will do certain things for you - those you want to be in Poland.

We see that in the west it is not better than in our country, abroad cultures are starting to dictate conditions there, you are not going anywhere from here to "better country", due to the fact that this country is here - and you cannot escape it - you gotta do something about it.

for fb:

Ms Margaret Gosievska - associate of the European Parliament

January 12 ·

The statistic below show the countries with the highest number of arrests for online statements. The United Kingdom headed by a disgraceful list of states repressing citizens for words. This is not "content moderating" or "user protection" – it's a blow to freedom of speech and fundamental civilian rights. Over 12 1000 cases in the UK, including Belarus, Germany and China. These are not individual situations, but the effect of systemic action by states on content published online.

Remember ACTA 2? At the same time, we heard that “it is only a fight against hatred” and that “the honest have nothing to fear.” In practice, it starts innocently: comment, entry, release – until freedom of speech ceases to be the foundation and becomes a legal problem. present the subject returns in a different form as #DSA. It is worth noting that Karol Nawrocki did not support these solutions, pointing to threats to freedom of speech on the Internet.