https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/ukraine-why-defeat-is-inevitable-part-3/
How will the war in Ukraine end? It seems that the United States – and consequently the full West – falls into a devastating humiliation of global importance. The Ukrainian summertime offensive was unintentionally met by Russian strategical goals and that is why Zelenski and his officials warned against it in the spring. It is in the offensive, not in the defense, that immense human and equipment losses arise. It is simply a permanent part of the war effort; however, armed drones, precision fire and aerial reflection have compounded this imbalance on the modern battlefield. Moscow did not lose any territory and bled the specially built Ukrainian forces from a comparative safety position. How warned American military commanders, the offensive can only take a fewer days before the rainy weather completely stops it.
In this way, the offensive has not only not achieved none from its targets, but it actually helped Russian targets, wasting equipment, consuming immense amounts of ammunition and throwing the lives of tens of thousands of soldiers at the wind. John Mearsheimer predictsthat Moscow is likely to exploit the demolition by entering into Ukraine at the end of this year. Kremlin now controls – and de facto rules – 4 circuits (regions) in the east of Ukraine, accounting for about 23 percent of the country's surface area. Mearsheimer predicts that the Russian army will carefully grow into another 4 circuits, stopping over Dnieprem and thus master 43% of Ukraine's surface. He says Moscow will halt at Dnieprem. The river is simply a natural obstacle, with which all forces, including NATO, would be hard to overcome against the forces of the size of Russia involved. More importantly, Putin found that he had considerable support among the population only in the east part of Ukraine. The further he continues to lead his army, the greater the threat of constant and fierce uprisings from Western nations, which in the past were profoundly hostile to Russian national existence.
Time will show whether Mearsheimer's forecast of Russia's march over Dniepr will be fulfilled. The alternate is that Putin fearing the further escalation of the United States decide to either stay on the current front or only modestly go west. Large-scale offensive operations would besides origin far greater losses in humans and equipment than Moscow experienced in the summertime defense. However, as shown in The first essay in this series, the Russian army historically established its way to devastating victories despite terrible fatalities. Whatever happens, Ukraine is surely incapable to push Russia east. The second Ukrainian offensive on specified a scale as this summer, we will not see. And due to the Kremlin He's not gonna give up. Any future peace agreements will gotta take account of the fact that at least 22 percent of the territory Ukraine before 2014 is now in fact Russian.
Henry Kissinger From the very beginning he warnedThat Washington would regret fueling the replacement war against Moscow on her own flank. By doing so, he argued, the West would inevitably make a monster from the Russian state. That is precisely what happened: Moscow's forces were drawn into Ukraine, tilting territorial and military balance of forces towards the Kremlin. Since March 2022 rejecting many calls from Putin and Zelenski to peace, Washington has now faced the dreary reality of its war policy: the Ukrainian economy is in ruins, the male population is greatly depleted, and the full state is completely and infinitely dependent on Western support. As Kissinger insisted, diplomacy would prevent the ravages of Ukraine and the Ukrainian people from beginning.
Thus American decision-makers face a dreary dilemma: either proceed utilizing Ukraine as a military platform against the Russians with declining profits; or accept actual Failure. The erstwhile will become virtually impossible and grossly absurd; and the second will signal the deep defeat of the American power and credibility. In both cases Ukraine will be a corrupt, hopeless country for decades to come – a fragile point of eternal crisis and conflict between East and West.
It seems that this full episode boils down to any kind of slowed down Suez crisis over US power. In 1956, Egypt's president Nasser announced that he nationalizes the Suez Canal Company, a gateway between Europe and Asia, even though it is controlled by European stakeholders. In response, Britain and France and Israel invaded Egypt to recover the canal from Egyptian control. president Eisenhower, fearing a wider war in the mediate East, yet ordered Prime Minister Anthony Eden to retreat his troops and endanger oil supplies to Britain. In the face of the wrath of a much stronger power, Eden had no choice but to agree. The crisis marked the end of Britain's function as a large power – a minute erstwhile seemingly proportional strategical ambitions were humiliated. Although the British people fell economically and imperially for half a century – previously losing the largest estates (the Indian subcontinent, regained freedom in 1947) – this crushing embarrassment of Suez abruptly exposed the magnitudes of the fall, beginning an era of almost unwavering obedience to the American power.
The Suesque crisis is instructive to realize the patterns of the fall of large powers in the modern age. The United States remains a global hegemon for the time being; however, their comparative strength has been decreasing for decades. Meanwhile, China emerged as the main economical and technological competitor, challenging the power of the United States in the Indo-Pacific region, effectively competing for imperial influences worldwide developing and conducting an interior trade war against US interests. United States Navy regularly loses computer-simulated war games against China, which fuels fear of violent defeat in the event of the Pacific Intercivilisation War.
Moreover, America itself upholds the NATO alliance, which is nothing but an empty fiction—a specified appearance of united military force and political cohesion. Most of its members, specified as Albania and Romania, would most likely never appear in the event of a confrontation with Article 5. The ones that would do this, like the United Kingdom and France, now have so limited military capabilities that their contribution would only be footnotes to an overriding run under the leadership of the US. The U.S. spends $811 billion a year defending itself. Another largest contributor to NATO is Britain, which spends only $72 billion. Although Poland and France plan to importantly increase military spending in the coming years, America inactive spends more than all another NATO members together – now annually by $448 billion. In the theoretical future wars with Russia and China, the United States can only number on itself that only they will bring crucial combat power.
Most importantly, the U.S. military force has late fallen rapidly. During the 1990–1991 Persian Gulf War, the United States was able to exhibit 5,000 fighters, which would give them a complete air advantage over their possible opponent. 3 decades later, as commentator Douglas Macgregor notes, due to staff shortages and logistical limitations, only 500 fighters could be displayed. Moreover, in report The Heritage Foundation, a conservative squad of advisors of 2022, considered the United States Air Force to be ‘very weak’ as the main factors listing an ageing fleet of aircraft and deficiency of pilots. The study states that USF's armed forces will fight “an equal competitor” and that, similarly, a sharp decline in real terms took place quietly throughout the US Army.
They besides endanger serious economical problems. Tens of large emerging countries, including China, South Africa, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia, are increasingly trying to abandon US dollar and permanently weaken itusing alternate currencies. On the planet stage, there is simply a circumstantial anti-American economical and diplomatic movement that presently aims to take over and reduce US influence. Alastair Crooke, erstwhile British diplomat and manager of the Conflict Forum, notes that upcoming global de Dollarisation It will inevitably increase inflation and interest rates in both the US and Europe in the coming years. In parallel to the increasing abroad threat, the US national economy is presently based on a dangerously fragile and rapidly increasing debt systemAnd many prominent scholars foretell a catastrophic fall.
Washington is still, for now, a large planet power. However, as Orwell told us, it counts destination. It is besides apparent that the comparative power of America, undefeated and certain in erstwhile decades, is weakening at an alarming rate. Her enemies unite and actively conspire to halt her influence. At the same time, according to nonsubjective indicators of economical and military strength and diplomatic force, America is weakening year by year.
Suez teaches us that military crises are utilized to exposure falling empires, uncover hidden weaknesses. The failed Washington policy in Ukraine is just a crisis in which US strategical objectives are thwarted at all turn. Almost unlimited sanctions imposed in early 2022 – initially hailed by a disastrous blow to Moscow – not only proved ineffective, but turned the Russian economical and industrial engine towards the most powerful opponents of the West, creating irreversible diplomatic and financial alliances now. Faced with Western's heaviest efforts – playing for the full stake – the ruble remained stable, and the Russian economy forecasted to proceed to grow rapidly.
Similarly, on the battlefield, increasingly desperate measures were applied to destruct Russian forces, ranging from delivering top-class western vehicles and weapons, through rockets of expanding scope to cluster ammunition. Each subsequent addition is presented by hawk commentators as a decisive instrument of triumph [wuderwaffe?]. Yet Moscow's forces not only stay rooted and stable, but they are constantly increasing in size and capacity. crucial battles, specified as the terrible demolition at Bachmut or the Ukrainian summertime offensive, bring devastating losses to Kiev. Western equipment, erstwhile regarded as the best technologically, chokes on battlefields in Donbasa, destroyed by mines, drones and rockets. Time will show whether Moscow will push deeper into Ukraine or keep the current front line forever. In any case, Russia's territorial buffer in east Ukraine is safe, and the Russian army will be against Kiev and its supporters for many years.
Western defeat in the region is now fact, From the very beginning a determined pursuit Ahabs to a substitute war against a historically threatening power. Logically, specified a policy could never succeed. The consequences of Western defeat and the deep decay it constantly exposes will reflect far beyond Russian limits.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Sign up for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
