Jakub Ignaczak: A Global Combat of the strategy and Antistem at the Metapolitics Level

What is “System”

In political and social sciences, we specify as a "system" a common set of elements from different areas of social life linked by common relations. Older theories focus on examining the material elements of a given system. On the another hand, fresh theories examine their relation and interrelationships and draw attention to the fact that a strategy that is not a permanent entity but is subject to continuous processes of becoming. In social sciences we separate many specified systems. With the aid of alleged systems theory, global relations can be explored regionally or globally and national interior political systems.

In contrast, under the word “System” written in capital letters, the author understands the deliberal strategy of the modern West. In terms of global demoliberalism, the author always writes “System” through large “S” to identify a circumstantial phenomenon of global reach, to separate demoliberalism from another systems.

The strategy is simply a collection of various liberal elements occurring in the modern West and, citing fresh theories, relationships connecting these elements. The Global strategy includes a liberal economy, politics, global relations, political and legal regimes of demoliberal states, the common relations of these states and non-state entities, social movements and the axiology of the strategy of philosophical and spiritual ideas.

To sum up, the strategy means a de-liberal civilization of the modern Western with a global reach.

Key components of the system

The Demoliberal strategy consists of the following precedence components: economical liberalism, the global dominance of the United States, political liberalism and liberal philosophy. The strategy economy is completely capitalist (economic liberalism). It operates based on the activities of large corporations with a global reach. The modern variant of global capitalism far departed from the assumptions of classical economical liberalism, which was popular in the 19th century. In global policy, the strategy is based on the global dominance of the United States (Western Block). Demoliberal ideology has been full implemented in the modern Netherlands. Amsterdam is frequently referred to as the “most liberal capital of the world”¹. However, Dutch liberalism is only local. It is the hegemony of the United States that makes the ideology of demoleberism scope global reach.

The United States (US) is the world's strongest demoliberal power. Around them the full western block is concentrated. The U.S. is the core and arm armor of the System. Previously, Britain was the most crucial liberal power. The English anthropologists of the second half of the 19th century, in order to justify the colonialism of their country, divided the various peoples of the planet into “wild” (not owning their own state) considered by them to be the most primitive, somewhat above “barbarbaric” (with the ability only to make unstable state structures) and the “civilized” hierarchy (with a unchangeable state and governed by the law). Britain was considered to be the most developed civilised state. It was widely believed that all countries should follow the liberal strategy of Britain.
In the second half of the 20th century, the United States replaced the United States on the place of the planet Hegemon of Britain. Leading Liberal Politologist Francis Fukuyama in his book “End of History”² stated that the optimistic “end of history” would come erstwhile all the countries in the planet adopted the US liberal political and economical model. It is worth noting that Francis Fukuyama himself is of nipponese descent. However, he graduated from the United States, lived there permanently, and made a technological career. He's no longer connected to Japan. He is widely recognized as an American political scientist. specified people who have been taken out of their natural environment are the most zealous followers of the demoliberal ideology and supporters of the U.S. hegemony.

The full demoliberal environment, following Fukuyama, recognizes the USA as the highest developed state of civilization and as a function model for the planet as before, the United Kingdom. This can be seen, for example, in Poland, where all demoliberal environments blindly support US policy, they consider the solutions utilized there to be good and worthy of transplantation. On the another hand, anti-liberal environments are fighting the United States, even American-phobic. For example, the author of this work has anti-liberal views, which makes it besides anti-jankean.

Although the U.S. global hegemony is not yet weakening, any countries are trying to accomplish comparative independency within the strategy and become regional powers (e.g. Turkey or Italy).

Demoliberism is inconsistent and has many local varieties. As each strategy is divided into components belonging to the full (so-called subsystems). We can divide each of these parts into lower order units. In addition to the United States, the western bloc besides includes the European Union (EU) and Asian countries (e.g. Japan or South Korea).

The political strategy of the strategy is liberal democracy. It is based on the regulation of law and political pluralism.

It should be stressed here that not all democracy is liberal. The regimes of countries specified as Belarus and Venezuela are democratic but non-liberal. Their democracy is that power comes from free democratic elections. However, there is no typical political pluralism of liberal Western democracies. Power in non-liberal democracies is legitimized by the advanced attendance and patriotic enthusiasm of the people expressed by the act of voting. If specified enthusiasm is not achieved and the legitimacy of power is high. specified a crisis occurred in Iran after president Ibrahim Ra’isi died in an air accident. At low turnout, the presidential election was won by a Liberal candidate. This greatly weakened the Iranian political system.

Liberal and non-liberal democracy are in acute conflict. Liberal-democratic Western states condemn non-liberal democracy, consider it evil, crippled, immature, etc. This is what the West's Democratic elites call Victor Orban's regulation in Hungary. Orban is accused of subjugating himself to the media and thus not giving emergence to his opponents, which is simply a violation of political pluralism. akin accusations are formulated against Turkey's president Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

However, it should be noted that political pluralism in liberal democracies is apparent. Theoretically, voters can vote for any political option (e.g. PiS, PO or RN, etc.). However, all these options disagree small from each another and all are of a demoliber character. Non-liberal options are excluded from the debate and prohibited. There has never been a democratic election to change the Liberal government to non-liberal. Nicolas Gomez Davilla said, "If elections could change anything, they would be banned."

The philosophical superstructure for the strategy is “postmodernism”. This is no longer classical philosophical liberalism. The liberal mainstream in doctrine distinguished itself from other, more Community currents by denying the existence of nonsubjective existence. He only assumed subjective perception of reality by an individual. In turn postmodernism is simply a full extension of liberalism, "absolute subjectiveism". Even the very nonsubjective awareness of the individual, which is considered only as a consequence of various social influences, is questionable. Postmodernism has already led to attempts to negate simple sex identity or genre identity.

Inside postmodernism there is simply a direction referred to as “memetics”. His main typical is Richard Dawkins, known for his attacks on religion (mainly Roman Catholic). According to memetic theory, man is only a product of replication of memes processed in human consciousness on the same rule as animals are a product of gene replication.

Modern postmodernism has subjugated the individual itself. In addition, modern Christianity is increasingly the transmission belt for liberal ideas in the world.

Demoliberism – sources, inspirations and perfect foundations

It is hard to give 1 thought origin from which modern demoliberalism grows. It derives inspiration from many currents previously occurring. First of all, demoliberalism in modern form is simply a alternatively fresh ideology. It can be linked to the Student Revolution’68 and the emergence of the alleged fresh Left. A generation born after the war of baby boomers who entered adulthood at the turn of the 1960s and 1970s wanted to settle with the fascist past of their fathers. People of the Generation’68 began to see fascism in all social hierarchy.

Earlier forms of liberal democracy looked completely different. Even after the First planet War, erstwhile all Western countries had already had a strategy of parliamentary democracy, they were not deliberal in today's sense (except France and the United States). In most countries, electoral law was restricted by various census (e.g. wealth or education). The parties were besides frequently cast by conventional elites.

Austria had at that time a two-party strategy consisting of the Austrian Christian-Social organization (Christlichsoziale Partei) Ӧstereichs, CS) and the Social Democratic Workers' organization of Austria (Sozial Democratische Arbeiterpartei Partei Ӧsterichs,SDAPӦ). But they both acted in 1 conservative order.

besides in the first years after planet War II, the German chancellor was Conservative Konrad Adenauer. The Conservative Adenauer line continued by the next Chancellor Ludwig Ekhard, who put into effect the pre-war presumption of "ordliberalism".

The West did not change until 1968, erstwhile fresh Left made the alleged "March by institutions". Democracy in the West then became a “fighting democracy” (determination of Donald Tusk) or 1 that all that the demoliberals do not like is “fascism” and fights.

Of course, demoliberalism did not grow out of political vacuum, it had many historical sources of inspiration. surely it was crucial to form the identity of the West: first the Renaissance, then the War of the United States independency 1775-1783 and the French Revolution 1789. Spring Peoples and Romanticism in the first half of the 19th century and later the end of planet War I.

Inspirations for liberalism can be sought even in any directions of the late medieval Christian thought, allowing the "scenes of the people".

Friedrich Nietsche felt that the most crucial breakthrough in doctrine had already been made in ancient times. As its creators he considersed Socrates and Aristotle. They made a transition from mythical reasoning (based on the immanent presence of the sacrum) to rational (perception of reality through subjective reason). Socrates' teachings were expanded by his continuing Plato and Aristotle. They had a different attitude towards the egalitarian society (Platon was a supporter of eliteism³). However, they both began replacing mythical reasoning with purely reasonable thinking.

Brad Miner, a writer associated with a typical conservative-liberal right-wing Yankee in his (according to the author of the poor) book “A Concise Encyclopedia of Conservativeism. individual Look” gives the most crucial foundations of Western civilization: Judaism, Greek philosophy, Roman law and Christianity⁴. akin Western principles are distinguished by Samuel Huntington in his work “The Crash of Civilization” and “The 3rd Wave of Democratization”⁵. This is the same way of reasoning by another Anglo-Saxon authors and most liberal politicians from Western Europe (e.g. Giovanni Sartori)⁶).

In the book “Society and Politics. The basis of political sciences" (the author frequently utilized it during his studies) authors besides claim that liberal political order is based on judaic doctrine (for example, the concept of an autonomous individual facing God according to Baruch Spinoza), Greek, Roman and Christian⁷.

The author agrees with what liberalism itself writes about. The basic sources of the strategy stay the same: judaic religion and the increasing Christianity, Greek doctrine and Roman law.

Alternative to Liberalism

The European political thought besides has anti-liberal traditions. An example is Giovanni Gentile, who began his way as a heglist, later passed through a liberal school of thought, and ended up in a fascist camp. One can only guess how past would have turned out if planet War II had ended with the triumph of the fascist camp. However, it is certain that Europe would not then be a liberal Europe. It should be noted that fascism is besides a doctrine increasing out of Modernity and has nothing to do with traditionalism. Nevertheless, many European traditionalists supported fascism.

Modernity has spawned not only liberalism but besides another directions contrary to it. In addition to Fascism, the modern currents are alternate to liberalism, communism represented by the russian Union and its satellite states, and Jacobinism, which, in addition to France, besides performed in Turkey (Cemism). This last stream is comparatively weak.

It should be noted that the Jacobin model of the state besides prevailed in Iraq, Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein confessed to his individual fascinations with asbinism. The ideology of his Baas organization was a syncretic mix of various Western currents adapted to local realities (ascobinism, communism, Islam, Christianity, etc.).

There is common agreement that demoliberism could only be born in the West and the anticipation of transplanting it into another cultural circles is very questionable. Samuel Huntington, for example, in the book "The 3rd Wave of Democratization", mentioned earlier, writes that the foundations of liberal democracy can be full realised, especially in Anglo-Saxon states. In the Mediterranean region, however, demoliberalism is very weak. A natural model of governance for Mediterranean culture is dictatorship⁸.

In Huntington's opinion, the demoliber institutions are the weakest in Spain and Portugal. Italy, where there is simply a culture of patriarchal families contrary to the principles of demoliberalism, can besides be counted among these countries. The author even met with a explanation that the large families of Florence from the 16th century inactive have a advanced political position and influence. It is besides not accidental that in Spain there were dictatorial “caudillo” governments. They would be impossible in the Anglo-Saxon culture.

Liberal democracy is inactive poorly received in countries specified as Japan and Russia. There is officially a liberal-democratic political strategy in Japan. However, since 1955, 1 Liberal-Democratic organization (Jimin-to) has ruled there. However, Russia inactive has an authoritarian presidential strategy (presidential oligarchy).

World strategy and Poland

Austrian thinker Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddin, conservative-liberal critic of demoliberalism in his “Portland Declaration”⁹, which influenced the author during the period of his formation of political views combines liberal democracy with a spiritual factor. According to him, the liberal-democratic model functions best in the Protestant-dominated Anglo-Saxon world. But it does not work in Orthodox and Roman Catholic communities. For specified communities the natural model is communist dictatorship or right-wing dictatorship. Kuehnelt-Leddin argues that the alleged “rule of the golden measure” is crucial for liberal democracy. In this model, different political options discuss each other. This should lead to consensus and adoption of solutions that are best for the community. Demoliberism is the other of extremes. Its assumptions best implement the political option of the centre. One can agree that this is what politics in the Anglo-Saxon planet looks like. In this cultural ellipse there is always a two-party political strategy consisting of 2 akin demoliberal parties. Voters can only vote for conservative-liberal right (Conservative Party, Tories) or social democracy (Labourist Party). This is best seen in Britain. The British Labour organization (for historical reasons the English Labour Movement is something different from the classical European Social Democracy) has been left-liberal since Tony Blair. On the another hand, the Conservative organization (the erstwhile Tory camp) had already abandoned the foundation of classical conservatism in the days of Margaret Theacher and took on a conservative-liberal character.

Before visiting Japan in 1903, Roman Dmowski, the creator of the Polish endecture movement, set Britain as a function model for Poles. In his “Thinkings of Modern Pole” Dmowski praised the stableness of the English strategy consisting of 2 main parties (one progressive and the another conservative)¹⁰. Both parties acted within a single political order. Apparently, the leading ideologist did not foretell that the most crucial political issues were agreed in Masonic lodges. Unorthodox directions in political discipline have this advantage over classical ones, that they besides consider the unofficial activity of different interest groups.

The regulation of the “golden measure” is completely not applicable in the Orthodox and Catholic world. Catholics and Orthodox tend to choose the far right and the far left.

K Theoryuenelta-Leddina confirms the past of the Polish political scene. Until the Civic Platform (PO) won the 2007 parliamentary election, the Liberal Centre option never held power in Poland. The current PO originates from the Union of Freedom (UW). The UW, on the another hand, was a combination of the left-liberal environment from Warsaw (Democratic Union, UD) and the economical liberal environment from Gdańsk ( Liberal-Democratic Congress, KLD). The Freedom Union never won the election, always ranked second or third. The fight for power took place mainly between the broad posse of post-solidarities parties and the post-communist camp (Democratic Left Soyusz, SLD).

However, considering the current political scene, it can be concluded that the postmodern model has yet acclimatized in Poland. Currently, all political parties (apart from the Law and Justice) are free of more expressive content in their programs, all are approaching the perfect center. All current political parties (PO, PSL, RN, etc.) are becoming more and more similar, the differences between them blur. The exception is Law and Justice (PiS). PiS is the last Polish organization of the old kind with a clear thought message. With the views preached by the Law and Justice organization you can agree or disagree (the author disagrees) but you gotta admit that this is the only organization to base its program on clearly defined ideas. This is due to the strong position of the leader Jarosław Kaczyński. Jarosław Kaczyński is an intelligent old-time, in his youth he acted on the Committee for the defence of Workers (KOR) and later in the anti-communist opposition. This shaped his expressive views, which he advocates by standing at the head of the Law and Justice. However, it is not excluded that in the close future the postmodern stream will besides dominate inside the Law and Justice Office erstwhile Kaczyński replaces the younger generation of activists represented by Mateusz Morawiecki. Morawiecki is an perfect technocrat. If he had taken over the leadership of the PiS after Kaczyński, he would surely have left all the clear elements distinguishing this organization from the others and bet on the alleged good government .

All political parties will most likely be postmodern soon. Political power will be replaced by good governance. Poland is now moving from modern to postmodern, from politics to postpolitics.

Expanding postmodernism is simply a consequence of Poland's engagement in the orbit of influences of global capitalism. The capitalist transformation in Poland conducted in the early 1990s created convenient conditions for large Western companies. The transformation did not lead to the appropriation and enrichment of Polish society. No native “Polish folk capitalism” was born. On the contrary, many Polish companies were bought by Western companies.

The goal of large global companies is to accomplish the maximum profit at minimum costs. Therefore, global companies always strive to harmonise, atomization and blur all differences (ethnic, religious, etc.) between people. Global capitalism leads to the creation of a consumer society. specified a society is always unified in nature and consists of tomized individuals, the sole intent of specified a society is to consume. This is why capitalist corporations frequently finance the fresh Left movement, which aims to destruct all group identities.

In a society of many different groups with strong identities (e.g. religious, ethnic, gender, etc.), large corporations request to diversify their advertising message to scope each specified group, which makes the task hard and increases costs. It is easier to get a circumstantial product advertising into a unified society of individuals.

Postmodern changes in the Western planet are inevitable. Poland is 1 of the Western countries so global processes will besides take place in our country. It will not even halt them being considered a “conservative” organization of the PiS. It does not substance whether at a given minute the power in Poland is exercised by liberals from the PO accepting postmodern changes enthusiastically and freely or Catholic “conservatives” from the PiS, who were drawn into the orbit of planet postmodernism. It is impossible to keep conservative positions and be part of the West at the same time.

The current PiS resembles the German CDU (Christlich Democratische Union, Christian-Democratic Union). The CDU was based on Christian conservatism in postwar Germany. However, it did not block access to postmodern content flowing from the US, abroad media and the unfettered activities of large corporations. They were besides allowed to spread leftist views at universities. This has all led to the emergence of the mentioned fresh Left and its "marss by institutions". We can observe akin processes in Poland today.

Capitalism and “new social groups”

Large corporations, on the 1 hand, aim to unify and destruct all group identities, on the another hand, fund and support the emancipation of alleged "new social groups" (e.g. women, gays, youth) which could be a beneficial mark for them. In their campaigns, the companies mention to groups that did not have much importance in conventional society. A peculiarly interesting example of this phenomenon is the gay movement, which dates back to the 1970s. It should be stressed that the gay movement in the first phase was something completely different from the current trend, which is now referred to as the LGBT. The story underlying it was the celebrated “stonewall brawl” of June 28, 1969, erstwhile a bunch of gays, transvestites and another freaks attacked the police and forced her to flee.

Gays and transvestites created their own neighborhoods. They built their identity by emphasizing a clear discrimination from most societies. Their main motto was “high income, no children!” (high income, no children). The competitions decided to support the gay community precisely due to the fact that they were geared to advanced consumption. In addition, gays as non-compulsive people, liberated from all moral and household restrictions, were large material for employees of specified corporations.

Today, for the needs of capitalist corporations, artificial fresh mark groups are being created and at the same time marginalize the basic groups of conventional society (e.g. men, women in conventional sense, mothers, etc.).

Pursuing the deconstruction of conventional society, the strategy not only creates artificially "groups of excluded" (e.g. gays) but besides refers to groups of genuinely existing, specified as blacks. Capitalism in the United States since Bill Clinton promoted in his black and Native American campaigns. The aim of the affirmation policy is to destruct a conventional society that existed in the United States inactive in the 1950s. On the 1 hand, the strategy strengthens organizations of the Black Live substance type, and on the another it leads to the marginalisation of the conservative identity of white workers from the Midwest and farmers from the South (so-called red necki). The strategy first wants to destruct the indigenous identity of the West. It so promotes various groups which it considers to be "exclusible" (e.g. black and Native Americans in the US, migrants in Western Europe). However, it should be stressed that its eventual nonsubjective is the global uniformisation and demolition of all identities. Under the conditions of demoliberalism, the first non-liberal identity of black, indigenous Americans or Muslims will besides be destroyed.

Republic of Belarus – the last non-liberal state in Europe

Belarus is the only non-liberal state in Europe and is simply a favourite place to emigrate to the opponents of demoliberalism from Western Europe. Western citizens persecuted due to their views can find safe shelter in Belarus (not a European arrest warrant). Many anti-liberal Poles besides emigrate to Belarus. The subject of emigration from the West to Belarus is consistently ignored by all demoliberal media relays.

Unfortunately, the emigration of Belarusians to Poland and Western countries is much larger. A large part of Belarusians leaving for Poland and the West in addition to purely commercial reasons is besides motivated by the freedom to discharge their sexual urges and the anticipation of unlimited consumption. In the communist generation of the author's parents, akin motivations pushed Poles to emigrate to the West. The environment of Polish expatriates in the USA, Canada and Western Europe is frequently composed of people who have abandoned their roots and all restrictions.

The author believes that the fascinations of Belarus as an perfect country are somewhat exaggerated. His experience shows that any elements of Western demoleberism besides pour into modern Belarus. This is seen mainly in the capital city of Minsk. As you know, urban culture is always degenerate. While in Minsk a fewer years ago, the author did not find many cultural and intellectual differences. A part of the young generation of Belarusians besides has, more or less, liberal views. The reason for this trend is mainly that the Belarusian authorities did not set dams for the main transmission lanes of post-modern ideas specified as Netflix.

Anti-liberal states specified as Iran and North Korea have protected their axiology, banned activities by Western corporations and net portals spreading postmodern rot. In theocratic Iran, all Western content is censored. Also, the beginning broadcast of the Olympic Games in Paris was censored in Iranian media, and the scenes of parody of the Last Supper were cut out. akin censorship of Western content is applied throughout the muslim world.

However, countries specified as Belarus and Russia are trying to make their own net portals that are transmission lanes of the native ideosphere (e.g. social networking portal В). This is good but insufficient. These countries do not have adequate censorship of Western content, they do not prohibit the activities of Western corporations and websites. This causes demolecular ideas to spread without major obstacles. Modern Minsk is not as corrupt as another European capitals, but it is besides very different from typical Polish cities. The conventional Belarusian village is an enticing alternate to urban culture. Folk culture, to a large extent, is inactive alive in modern Belarus. specified a village consists of wooden huts and livestock in bypasses. In Poland, villages of this kind died at the end of the 1980s.

Poland as a Conservative State ?

In addition to the Republic of Belarus, Poland is besides recognized by the West-based alt-right identity-right environments (mainly the identity-based environment of the “Arktos”) as a country, even highly conservative. There is an opinion that in Poland conservatism is dominant not only in intellectual environments but even in the street. Individuals from abroad who do not know Polish realities even completely taken over by the Law and Justice, the celebrated Warsaw independency March seems to be an awesome anti-liberal event. Comparing Poland, where the independency March takes place cyclically, e.g. with modern Germany, where all anti-immigration marches organized by AfD (Alternative füDeutschlad, alternate for Germany), on which Ausl was sungänder raus!” sparked the interest of the Constitution Protection Office it is indeed crucial to say that the situation in our country is not besides bad. Related to the alt-right movement, Swedish blogger and bodybuilder Marcus Follin known by the nickname “The Golden One” even moved the production of his shirts with identity motifs to Poland, which he considers to be “conservative”. besides author of the book “The Return of the actual Right”¹¹ Daniel Friberg emigrated to Poland.

In Western environments, the alt-rights are besides attracted by Hungary ruled by Victor Orban. Related to the “Arktos” release, native of the US Rod Dreher, author of the book “Operation of Benedict. How to last the Time of Neo-Paganism”¹² He yet moved to Hungary. Dreher dedicated his life to spiritual quests. He was raised in a Protestant family, later converted to Catholicism, now he is Orthodox.

Another direction of migration for Western Identifiers is Serbia and the autonomous Serbian Republic in Bosnia and Herzegovina. A large part of the editorial publicationInand “Arktos” just settled in Serbia, where they manage the publishing house.

What ‘Antisystem’ should be

The author calls the “Antistem” of all currents and political centres hostile to global demoliberism (System). According to the author, the Anti-system should be like the strategy a working phenomenon In global scale. 1 of the slogans of “Arktos” says: “Make antiglobalism global”, which perfectly reflects the character of the Antisystem. However, the anti-system cannot constitute a unified block akin to the System. 1 should not return to the bipolar world, where the pole other to the world's hegemony of the US was the Communist russian Union. Various very different anti-system currents (e.g. extremist Muslims, alt-rightists, communists, anarchotribalists, etc.) will not function well in 1 block.

The Catholic traditionalist Nicolas Gomez Davila, mentioned earlier, claimed: “Contravolution cannot be a mirror image of the Revolution. It should be the opposite.” On a akin basis, the Antisystem should be the other of the System. The strategy is unified so the Anti-system should be diverse, The strategy is monopolar so the Antipolar strategy should be multipolar, etc. The planet Antisystem should choose an angry swarm of bees strategy. The individual elements of the Antisystem should attack the strategy separately but simultaneously from different sides. The provinces should turn against the center.

In modern social sciences, there is simply a belief that reality is changing, its nature is constant “becoming”. Therefore, a multi-polar strategy based on the operation of "combined vessels" is something better and more durable than a single-polar system. The decline of 1 origin does not preclude the continuation of the remaining factors.

Main currents of the modern Antisystem

The most crucial contemporary trend of the Anti-system is extremist Islam based on literal explanation of the Quran represented by the muslim State, the erstwhile Al-Qaeda and another organizations of this type. It has already reached global scope and has the ambition to make a "second planet pole" against the demoliberal West. The muslim Nurt has large influence in the mediate East and Sahara. Everywhere it seeks to make a state based on a fundamentalist and revolutionary social knowing of the teachings of Islam. specified a state would be based on jammatas (communities of warriors).

From the point of view of another entities of the Antisystem, the muslim current is regarded as problematic, as in addition to attacking the strategy it sometimes besides attacks another entities of the multipolar world. An example of this is an assassination at the amusement centre of “Krokus” in Moscow by the muslim State. Russian authorities have been trying for a long time to shed work for this assassination on Ukrainians. Eventually, however, they had to admit that it was truly done by Islamists from the muslim State.

Another regionally crucial anti-systemic trend is the national liberation left from Latin America, whose ideology is referred to as "bolivarianism". Bolivarianism is simply a syncretic mix of Christian liberation theology, socialism, populism, communism, nationalism, and pantheistic religion of Native Americans. The Bolivian Nut has a large support among the indigenous population of Latin America. For example, the erstwhile president of Peru Ollanta Humala, who for a time was a supporter of Bolivianism referred to the Inca nationalism and the Tahuantinsuyu tradition (Imperium of Inca), which included areas presently owned by Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador. Currently, the improvement of the Bolivian trend in Latin America has been somewhat hampered. Nbut to him the Sandinist Nicaragua ruled by Daniel Ortega, Venezuela Nicolas Maduro, Bolivia Luis Arca and Evo Morales, and Castrist Cuba Miguel Diaz-Canel. respective islands in the tiny Antilles besides turned to the side of Bolvarianism. These countries are associated with the Bolivarian alternate to America (ALBA), an organization that, before the embargo was imposed by the US, was financed mainly by the sale of Venezuelan oil.

The multipolar planet in the mediate East is besides represented by Shiite Iran. Iran's alleged opposition Axis covers Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Iran's influence reaches even African Nigeria, where the Iranian-backed Shiite Intelligence organization Bokko Haram operates. By building Iran's own sphere of influence, it goes even beyond the limitations of Shiite religion. He besides managed to join Sunni Hamas Resistance.

Another regional trend of Antistem is the alleged “Russian world” (русский мир) which includes political and economical cooperation between the states: Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Armenia. improvement of this trend has besides been hampered in fresh years. In addition to the integration of the Eurasian space, Russia is besides active in Africa. Russian mercenaries fought, among others, in Mali, Niger and Burkina Fasso.

The multipolar planet is besides increasingly concentrated around China. Many analysts consider China to be the second most crucial planet power in the United States. In addition to controlling Asia, China is becoming increasingly active besides in Africa. They practically managed to get free of completely British influence, and it is simply a substance of time to displace French influence.

The various currents of the Antisystem can work together despite their differences. An example is the theocratic cooperation of Iran and Venezuela's left-wing oil extraction. Iran provides Venezuela with specialists and technology.

The multipolar planet is that different civilizations work together but no impose their own solutions on others. The solutions adopted in the desert will not be good in the polar climate and vice versa. Controversial contemporary Russian thinker Alexander Dugin claims that all people and all culture has its own “Dasein” ( Martin Heideger term). It is located in a circumstantial place and time. Objectively there are no cultures of better and worse, primitive and civilized peoples, little and more noble. If we were to compare different cultures with each other, only in terms of adaptation to a peculiar environment and surviving in harmony with that environment. We should not be offended, for example, by the fact that in any regions of China women are deformed and in East Africa women are mutilated before marriage. specified customs have a deep root in the culture and tradition of the people. Even if they are degenerous from our point of view, we should not force them to be banned, but to let the people in the process of evolution to abandon themselves.

Optimum anti-system variant – author's observations

Modern political scientists are inactive arguing whether a good political strategy should supply advanced economical growth and comfort for a given community (liberal model of free competition) or better safeguard its endurance and safety (state as an omnipotent ‘Leviathan’ in the concept of Thomas Hobbes¹³). It should be agreed that the top economical growth and comfort of life is provided by a liberal model. Liberal states are mostly richer than non-liberal. The corporateism of the Latin countries was completely absorbed by Anglo-Saxon demoliberism, the fascist bloc lost the war to the Western bloc, German ordoliberism lost the rivalry to Anglo-Saxon capitalism, and the demoliberist West won the rivalry to the Communist bloc.

economical growth, however, is at the expense of the endurance and safety of the community. Only for the consumption of Western demoliberal societies are getting older. Currently, all Western European countries are already experiencing negative growth¹⁴. In order to keep economical dynamics in an increasingly ageing society, Western governments must constantly bring immigrants.

According to the author of the text, the basic social cell should not be an individual, as liberals want, nor a atomic family, as liberal Christians want, but a family. The family-based strategy works perfectly even in conditions of capitalism. The various lists of the richest people in the planet are wrong, due to the fact that they only consider the richest individuals (e.g. Bill Gates), alternatively than the large families (e.g. Wallenbergs, Rotschilds, etc.). The property and position of the household will always be greater than individuals. The household ensures the transfer of culture and property. The advanced position of families is peculiarly visible in Italian culture, as shown by the tv series “Peaky Blinders” and another films of this kind (e.g. “The Soprano Family”, “The Godfather”, etc.). In 1 episode of “Peaky Blinders” the main character of the show Tommy Shelby wins rivalry with Changretta, head of the Italian mafia operating in the US, in specified a way that he kills all members of his household and the people serving Changretta only bribes for money. The car company “Fiat” from Turin has besides been run by the same household of Angellich for decades. As mentioned earlier, Florence is besides unofficially ruled by families dating back to the 16th century. Within the household there should be a community of goods, while outside individual families could compete with each other. specified organized patriarchal families would be like the hordes in which the first people have lived since the Australopitek era. It is the natural communities connected by common origins (nations) and community of destiny (compression) that are an alternate to the central unit of liberalism, on the 1 hand, and the model of the omnipotent state device (the state as the ‘Leviathan’) supported by Tomasz Hobbes and contemporary e.g. Giovanni Sartori on the other.

The liberal political scientist Francis Fukuyama in his work “The foundations of political order from prehuman times to the French Revolution” emphasizes that the first people before the creation of the first civilizations lived in hordes, or groups connected with individual bonds of loyalty. In the same way, there are herds of closest relatives of the man – the bonobo chimpanzees. According to Fukuyama, specified groups are natural communities to man. All another communities specified as nation, state or social class are artificial¹⁵. It is impossible to build loyalty and trust between people who are alien to each other, with whom we have only membership and common bond. Trust and loyalty only unites those who know each another well and share common origin and common fate.

The last group of indigenous Australians (Aboriginals) belonging to the Pintupi strain surviving in a conventional way was only discovered in the late 1980s and 1990s. At the time the researchers found the group's patriarch, his wives and children, were no longer alive. This nine-person Aboriginal group has been wandering through the deserts of Australia for many years, maintaining its collection and hunting without any contact with modern civilization. It should be stressed that for hundreds of thousands of years (taking into account besides the ancestors of man, even for millions of years) this is how all mankind lived. The unchangeable way of life is so profoundly rooted in our mentality that it cannot be converted into an individual, a atomic family, a social class, a nation or a state.

alternate to liberalism, social models (fascist-militaristic model, communist and nationalist-Jobinski) lost due to the fact that they wanted to replace the community with natural artificial creation (state, social class or nation). specified a strategy based on artificial bonds always burns out ideologically and falls down. An example of specified a malfunctioning strategy was the end of communism in the 1980s. The appeals to the worker's ethos and the planet revolution inactive existed, but in practice it was clear to everyone that, in fact, everything possible should be removed from the workplace.

Today's most controversial Polish politician Grzegorz Braun stated in 1 of his fiery speeches that "in politics they regulation the services, lodges and mafias". Braun found these 3 elements to be negative due to the fact that they conflict with the western state of law. Only services as part of the state machinery should be removed from this triad. The lodges and mafias the author finds affirmative due to the fact that they are based on individual ties. Natural communities (communities, families) must be rebuilt. Gemeinschaft (natural community) is always better than Gesellschaft (artificial community). Hence, the various lodges and mafias (in a affirmative sense) request to be valued. Anti-system environments should form their own Camraclinized groups, around which the widely understood possessions (women, children, animals, farmland, etc.) will gather. In muslim culture, these may be conventional jammatas, and in Indo-European culture, various another male-warmen communities that occurred here during conventional times.

Natural Communities and the State

Tomasz Gabiś, 1 of the most valuable modern political thinkers in his book Imperial Games, advocates a model of “ordered anarchy”¹⁶. Gaby believes that humanity should return to pre-state. He advocates life exclusively for life in natural communities.

However, the functioning of natural communities can be reconciled with the existence of a state system. The Catholic social thought of the mediate Ages provides valuable inspiration. The medieval knight swore allegiance to his direct master (senior). The full feudal strategy of medieval Europe relied on the vassal's individual ties to the senior. At the very top of the social hierarchy was the Emperor.

The feudal strategy of the mediate Ages yet collapsed, as it lacked healthy competition between individual actors. The weakness of Catholic social thought is precisely that it assumes the harmony of all elements and excludes any competition. The social strategy is only viable if it is based on free competition.

Another origin of inspiration may be the modern Russian Federation. Opponents of modern Russia (especially those connected with the leftist-liberal trend) frequently describe it as a "neofeudic" state. According to the author, this message is justified and positive. The full “Russian world” consists of independent entities whose leaders are linked to a individual relation with president Vladimir Putin. Alexander Lukashenka, Ramzan Kadyrov, Evgeny Prigozin (rebellious vassal) and Alexey Miller can be called Kremlin vassals. President of the Republic of Belarus Aleksandr Lukashenka has full interior sovereignty. However, in global relations he is full loyal to the Russian Federation. A akin position has Chechnya ruled by Ramzan Kadyrov. Since the beginning of the Russian Federation, Chechnya has been its most unstable component of the Russian Federation. There were strong separatist sentiments. There was besides a strong threat to Chechen muslim terrorism in Russia. Everything changed erstwhile Kadyrov became president. He fulfilled all the demands of Chechen Islamists while remaining in the structures of the Russian Federation. presently Chechnya is an autonomous muslim republic forming part of the Russian Federation. Kadyrov supports Putin in war activities in Ukraine. The Kremlin's next vassal was until late the leader of the Wagner Evgeny Prigozhyn group. The Wagner group created by him was a torture of the men-warriors, whose individual bonds of loyalty and the common ethos of the warrior. Following the death of Prigozhyn, Wagner's chief was a typical Cremolist bureaucrat Anton Jelizarov named “Siwy” (Седый). As long as the Wagner Group maintained independency from the authorities and combined it the common ethos was successful in war. It has now been completely marginalized. In turn, Gazprom head Alexey Miller created a supranational financial empire. He has individual ties and economical relationships with the Kremlin.

On the another hand, antisythemic environments in the West should make their own camaraderie. They could function independently of a demliberal state, as could the communities of Catholic traditionalists centered around the Trident Mass. On a akin basis, another conventional spiritual communities (e.g. Muslim, Orthodox, Neo-Paganic, etc.) besides be in the West.

James Ignaczak