Can military action (i.e. "war" virtually and not legal) be completed in a fewer days? Turns out you can erstwhile at least 1 side wants to or needs to. The fact that many call this ending a "capitulation" or a "defeat" or a "win" of 1 organization does not substance at all.
In fact, everyone has the right to interpret the events in any manner biased or even hostile. individual forced Israel to end the genocide war with the Palestinians. Could individual besides force the parties to the war in Ukraine to halt shooting each other? Listening to the “free media” message of propaganda on the already (not our) war in the east of Europe, it could be concluded that the past 3 years of this conflict were a series of triumphant victories of Ukrainian troops over contemptible and, above all, the inept “aggressor”, besides “damaged” regular by the sanctions of the “Western collective”. In addition, the intent of the West's participation in the war was (and remained?) unchanging: Russia must (as if) lose, be humiliated, pay reparations, and surrender all occupied territories of the erstwhile Ukrainian Socialist russian Republic, whose "socialist authorities" declared "independence" in 1991.
As you can see in the consciousness of the collective West, the russian Union, which was a associate of this creation, is eternally alive and "perpetual" (as it is now said): billions of dollars or euros must be spent to defend it to the degree of absurd decisions, e.g. to join in 1954 this "socialist republic" of Crimea, which in the last millennium belonged to the Crimean Khanate, i.e. to the Tatar rulers and was never part of any "Ukraine". I will not be ironic, but the only crucial link of this Chanat with the Malorussian tradition (i.e., as it is termed "Ukrainian"), is the support of Tatar troops led by Tuchaybej for the Cossack revolt led by Bohdan Zenobi Chmielnicki in 1648.
If individual is without ideological confusion describing the Russian-Ukrainian war from 2022 to 2025 (maybe individual will find one), he will most likely diagnose this conflict as follows: after the Russian army attack in 2022, there may have been a compromise over a fewer months to put an end to this dispute, but for incomprehensible reasons individual persuaded the Kiev authorities to proceed resisting it, he spent unimaginable amounts of money so that, after 3 years, a Russian-Ukrainian compromise could be concluded for much (for Ukrainians) worse conditions than in 2022. After all, it is absurd, which in addition definitely crossed out all the plans to deepen European integration without exception, that led to: the collapse of governments in all the major capitals of the old Europe and deprived the economy of these countries of the only strategical advantage in the form of access to inexpensive Russian natural materials, and to the unification of the political Global South, in which 1 of the major roles of the full northern Russia.
Must specified a war be ended as shortly as possible? Yes, from the interests of the West. Of course, it would be best (also from his perspective) for individual else to bear the remainder of the cost of this absurdity, and peculiarly the foolish in their rusophobia any states of a fresh Europe that will be "faithful to the end" of their foolishness. But whether Russia will agree to this, which notabene besides lost in old Europe everything she could lose, even though objectively no 1 had defeated it.
I wonder if the fresh “world leadership” will keep its word and lead to the end of the war besides in this closest European east. I think so, due to the fact that the mass desertion of Ukrainians from the front of “our war” is already a fact and there are less and less people willing to die for “single Ukraine”.
I have a somewhat bitter satisfaction with the collapse of successive governments in the European leadership states. I erstwhile wrote that changing a vector to anti-Russian in their capitals would be the origin of their political and economical crisis. Not only in Paris and Berlin but besides in London. Let me remind you that the failure of “their” politicians is much wider, due to the fact that they were not the only ones who were besides silent or even loud opponents of Donald Trump. Will the political crisis come to Warsaw after his swearing in, due to the fact that the doors to the White home are alternatively closed for the current government team? If “GazWyb” convinces itself that president Donald will appreciate the function (what?) of Prime Minister Donald, it is most likely bad or very bad. After fresh statements by public officials about censorship of the net and the ongoing Polish-Russian war, it cannot truly be worse. This “war” can besides be completed in a fewer hours.
Prof. Witold Modzelewski
Think Poland, No. 5-6 (2-9.02.2025)
