Is Trump serious about the war on Iran? To realize this, it is crucial to look at his accounts from Netanyahu and see who has the advantage of bringing the US into war, and whether Israel can actually be a greater threat to the US than Tehran could always be.

The trap Trump falls into is that he has small or no area to control Iran's crisis, while Israel may endanger to isolate him while he himself is carrying out the attack.

There are 2 dynamics that have difficulty uncovering compromise. Trump wants an agreement with Iran that takes distant their atomic capabilities, while Israel wants a war that will overthrow the Iranian government and install the Mosad/CIA puppet.

The problem, however, is that Israel is not an honest middleman and is constantly shifting boundaries.

The latest request is now to remove Iranian ballistic missiles at the center of any deal Trump will carry out.

Trump is trapped and knows how Bibi manipulates him.

He may sometimes curse journalists and pretend to be his own boss and president, and Israel is the client state of Washington, who must stick to it, but in fact it is clear that Israel dictates the terms.

In fresh days, we have heard that the only aircraft carrier the US had in the region, USS Abraham Lincoln, is to join the second USS Gerald Ford.

American media reports that Lincoln is on "Arabic Sea", which is simply a comical word that stays distant from Iran's coasts and Huti missiles off Yemen's coasts.

However, another reports propose that the reason Trump claims to have sent a second aircraft carrier – to strengthen "flotilla" in the event of a war with Iran, it is not true.

Some insiders inform journalists that Lincoln has method problems that will render him useless in combat conditions and so must be replaced by a more advanced Ford.

But even this may be a false communicative portrayed by Pentagon insiders who are not Trump's supporters.

The second explanation for operators is that this gives Trump time.

He even told journalists that Ford would get to this place in about a month, which he thought would be adequate time to make an agreement with Iran, or at least give him 4 weeks to make a way to deal with the threat – that is simply a threat from Israel. Not Iran.

Israel threatened Trump earlier in June last year erstwhile he carried out his bunker-destroying bombs, saying simply:

"If you don't, we'll bomb Iran."

We did it.

This time the threat is:

"If you don't join us, we'll hit Iran alone and you'll gotta face the consequences of being the first president of the United States to explain to the judaic lobby why Iran erases Israel from the map."

This second threat is multi-layered and can besides act on Trump, given that the upcoming elections of the word of office will cost twice as much as the elections that provided him with office.

This time, the judaic money will fund him, with the intention of saving him from the failure of both chambers and the inevitable impeachment.

And so in many ways Trump is closer and more dependent on the Tehran government to aid him.

An agreement that limits uranium enrichment and guarantees that an atomic bomb will not be performed can be something that can present the Americans as a large victory.

Ironically, the agreement may be mostly a copy of Obama, whom he, Trump, rejected during his first word of office, which has sparked the current crisis.

The problem with any current enrichment agreement is that it is likely that it will not satisfy Israelis, who have become increasingly aware of the capabilities of the latest generation of Iranian ballistic missiles both in terms of defence and attack.

Moreover, the US attack on Iran lasting 12 days last year raised the stakes to the summit, making the Iranians clearer and more focused on any attack: The full war.

According to credible reports, Trump late asked Pentagon chiefs if the U.S. could carry out 1 operation "come in and out", which could be utilized to inform Iran, at the same time satisfying Israel due to the threat from the US, and was told that specified options were not possible.

This is due to the fact that Iran is now far better prepared for specified attacks, both military and intelligence, while Mossad's operation of causing interior unrest on the place ended in a spectacular defeat.

The US is presently in a very hard situation due to the fact that their forces and allies in the region are targeting Iran at the time of the first bomb being dropped, so Trump's options for war are very limited.

It would be suicide if Trump hit Iran due to the fact that the losses on the U.S. forces side and the disruption of oil distribution by the Ormuz Strait would be besides large, not to mention the demolition of infrastructure in Israel itself.

But there is another origin that puts all the force on Trump to make an agreement with Iran.

Since June of last year and Trump's last betrayal to Putin in relations with Putin, which had arisen in Alaska, with the coup in Venezuela, both Russia and China increased their support for Iran.

It is now a key origin that stops Trump from hitting Iran any.

China has late given Iran the latest modern radar strategy that can identify US stealth bombers over a distance of 700 km.

Game change.

If we consider Iran, Israel and the US as 3 poker players at the table, it is now clear that Iran now has the best hand with the highest number of options.

It can make maximum usage of its function now and exploit Trump's vulnerability by seeking an agreement to mitigate sanctions, or it can withstand and play on a long scale much beyond Trump's monthly breath zone, upping the tension before November's midterm election.

Iran always plays on time and is good at this strategy.

And given that even the mildest analysis of U.S. attack capabilities in Iran is 2 weeks before all rocket supplies are exhausted, any hawk close to Trump, who is pressing for an attack, must besides have in his strategy the demolition of the U.S., as Iran cannot be forced to surrender in specified a short time.

That can't be Bibi's target. surely not!