Whether Kaczyński's tape is simply a "bomb" or a "capist", I do not know that and I do not intend to lower myself at all to measure it in specified categories. This way of dealing with public affairs seems to me worthy of being pushed on Twitter, let the curious people decision there.
What I'm curious in as a citizen of this country is the regulation of law. The PiS defenders immediately assured that Kaczyński's tape did not show a violation of the law.
"I see nothing illegal there. This is the older, cultural master who wants to build high-rises,” wrote his leading representative, Grzegorz Wszołek, in his celebrated Salon24 website.
I will put good will here – let's say that everyone writing in this way simply does not know the law. So here's the teacher.
Before a cultural old man who dreams of building high-rises, the law fundamentally sets 3 roads. He has to make up his head about 1 of them.
In 1 of these ways, our old man can become a businessman. He can straight manage these skyscrapers, building them, for example, through his hotel network, as Conrad Hilton did a fewer decades ago. He can besides lend them his name as a brand, like Donald Trump.
To this end, our old gentleman must registry his business. In practice, it will do so in the form of a company, but very theoretically it could put up a tiny skyscraper as part of self-employment (PPHU Interntransjanusz Tower).
The second road is simply a non-profit path. Our charming cultural old man can registry an association or foundation to build Cat Tower – a skyscraper, a gathering place for cat lovers.
In practice, non-profits actually frequently invest in real estate. In the centre of Stockholm and Oslo there are buildings with trade union office – they are not skyscrapers in today's sense of the word, but they show any momentum and optimism of social democracy from almost 100 years ago.
The biggest investors of this kind are most likely spiritual unions. I erstwhile described on a blog a unusual vicinity of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the heart of fresh York City. In Warsaw Nycz Tower is about to stand, we see evidence that the Christian denomination is doing best in the developer.
Finally, the 3rd option is the way of politics. Our beautiful old man can become a social or political activist whose dream is to put skyscrapers in the public interest (such as he understands) – here are any real examples, specified as Robert Moses in fresh York.
And now we have the key question: What precisely does Jaroslaw Kaczyński do in the recorded conversation?
The gag is that these roles must not be mixed. Donald Trump is not allowed to combine the function of developer with the function of president, or even a presidential candidate (the investigation of the alleged collusion concerns the alleged mixing of these roles, for example to get approval for Trump Tower in Moscow).
Commercial activities (for-profit), social activities (non-profit) and political activities are governed by applicable laws. The parties are not allowed to carry out economical activities, to profit from foundations, to usage protection for business – etc.
Well, all answer to the question about the function of Kaczyński in this conversation leads to the conclusion that he has broken at least 1 of these laws. If he was there as a politician – he broke the organization bill and anti-corruption regulations. If as a businessman, he participated in the alleged firmactwa (there is simply a time erstwhile someone, colloquially called a ‘slut’, only pretends to be conducting an economical activity, in reality conducted by individual else). The treatment of the foundation as its own company is besides unhalo, as James W.
Some of these violations are prosecuted by the prosecution, any by the taxation office, any by civilian law. Given that an Austrian entrepreneur is involved, action at global level may besides be excluded. I hope that his lawyers are worth paying their own – it is their next move.
The argument “everyone does so” is so pointless that even if: well, if individual captures them or otherwise, I will besides say it is simply a scandal. Even if it concerns Zandberg (not to mention Schetyn). I will have no mercy for those I vote for.
However, at the end I will note that the PiS had a good 3 years to find evidence of akin illegal activities of the Platform – and it was only a wet cap. Even on octopus tapes there is no evidence of crime – there are only any ugly words.
It is sad that individual prefers cultural criminals to law-abiding citizens who curse at vodka.
