It's my first night. Campus Poland Donald Tusk's future stated that in this word there is no chance of granting reproductive rights to women. Similarly, he spoke in July erstwhile the law decriminating abortion aid was rejected due to the fact that the government lacked 3 votes of the KO MPs and the opposition turned out to be 24 PSL Members. The Prime Minister, who before this vote was suffocating and reminding the Coalition Members on October 15, how crucial this vote is – spread his hands and stated that it was impossible. Although, in fact, it would be adequate if the Prime Minister managed to discipline all the KO Members – there were not a twelve PiS Members in the parliament hall.
Does that mean the Prime Minister admits defeat? I don't think so. I inactive find it hard to believe that he did not find adequate arguments at the time to encourage PSL Members to vote so crucially. I don't think he did. After all, he can gain from his 2 smaller coalitions – after all, where 2 fight, there is simply a third.
The tough placing of the case on Campus, although a second approach to voting on the decrimination bill is planned, puts both coalitions in difficulty. The Levite is portrayed as completely powerless, why Vladimir Czarzasty tried to oppose. "No 1 is bothered, the Left will not halt fighting for fresh abortion laws. I do not agree with the thesis that nothing can be done in this parliamentary term. Donald, I'm sorry, but we won't back down," said the leader of the Left, which did not sound very convincing. The MP and MPs of the Left are simply not adequate in the Sejm, and their politeness with the aggressive attacks of the PSL seems weak. The black man wants to play the same game as last year, the Left sees in position a younger, kind and good sister at the side of KO.
The PSL should besides feel afraid with Tusk's words – the Prime Minister just admitted that the Coalition on October 15 is uncertain that there are besides many right-wing MPs in this Sejm. And PSL is playing for this, that there will be an enfant terrible, inactive blackmailing colleagues, even those closest to it – a throng from the 3rd Way, for which maintaining the coalition is important. Well, the coalition is, but it doesn't should be – the Prime Minister seems to say.
Yes, for Poland 2050 or for the Left, the existence of the Coalition on 15 October is crucial as a commitment to voters who have been offered a "other", cooler, more honest policy. Problem is, the others don't want to play. The PSL, which got into the Sejm on the back of Poland 2050, immediately began to spread its elbows, and the Civic Coalition verbally ignores the coalitions (when you heard a associate of the KO speaking, e.g. on the occasion of the issue of abortion or partnerships, about the coalitions from the Left?), highlighting only its function and its good intentions, which, however, cannot be changed to deeds against the quarrels of the coalitions.
The coalition on October 15 turns out to be an attraction, serving each of the coalitions for something else.
And the weaker the coalition, the more clearly you can see that it was a mistake to go to the election on 3 lists and play in a "common list of tasks", i.e., let's remind – caught from the air by passwords, unthought out, not arranged in any more complex policy. You had to make 1 list, Tusk's list, drive the Law and Justice into 4 winds, and give people what they want, not bargain all inch of the bill. What we request is simply a strong hand rule, due to the fact that only a strong hand can deal with populism. And Tusk just promised it, returning to Poland: that he would teardrop the Law and the Law and reconstruct democracy.
Each subsequent act proving the weakness of the Coalition on October 15 – concluded not for love, but in the absence of another possibility, 1 week before the election – proves the truthfulness of the above thesis. And it will stay actual in the arrangement in which Donald Tusk adheres to the strategy of the lion, ruling indistinguishably – until there are respective strong politicians who choose the strategy of the foxes and bet on a real coalition alternatively than a mockery.
The Lion strategy is characteristic of Polish history: waiting for the marshal, then for Anders, then the long-term fight of Kaczyński and Tusk. Everyone is to save the nation and from this position the coalition is an annoying game, compromises – unsatisfying to anyone. You request to exposure the coalition as weak as possible and get back in the game for everything. Give the chief full authority.
Although Donald Tusk argues that he will not search the presidency, there is inactive adequate time to change his mind. What kind of chief would he be? due to the fact that it's clear that if he becomes president, that function and function will be much stronger, possibly like French. But did Macron's strong presidency weaken populism in France? Nope. France is akin to Poland in terms of its ease of playing on distinctions, dignity and contempt, on aspirations and frustrations – even though in Poland it was possible to make a popular social promotion, in culture memory of deep differences remained.
The governments of the lion, the governments of the strong hand, will so be the governments of those who are right, as was already the case after the transformation, until the despised "moher berets" will again let populists to win.
