I have this dishonest superiority over the (privately sympathetic) married couple Mr. Wielomski, that I published by the Polish thought book by Alexander Dugin [1] read, while they seemingly did not, but in nothing 2 charming polytologists did not prevent the discussion of the said publication.
And in fact, the full polemic could be concluded, simply stating that the attitude of "I do not know, so I will speak" (as typical of the Polish blogosphere and the full pseudo-public debate) does not even bypass as dry analysts and experts of another political issues as ed. Magdalena Ziętek-Wielomska and col. prof. dr hab. Adam Wielomski. And yet, alternatively of my co-authors with Conservatives.pl, accompanied by fights about political rationality and Polish national interest to wash distant with a simple mention to reading prior to writing subsequent reviews – let me draw their attention to a comic paradox. Especially the col. Adam, if only after “Manifesto of the large Awakening and Writings of War Time” erstwhile reached out – he would have discovered in the writings Alexander Gielewicz crucial theoretical and ideological support for its own criticism of the large Reset, and in peculiar its final part, which refers to the final treatment of humanity as such.
Dugin is not just another critic of the most perverted aspects of global liberalism, but a philosopher who draws a clear line between all destructive and anti-human currents, already built on the first rebellion of nominalism against the traditions of Plato, Aristotle and St. Thomas. Yes! Dugin, this terrible rasputino-like prophet, who, according to Prof. Wielomski, wants to baptize on Orthodoxy – acknowledges the value of Western scholastics, recognizing in her an crucial ally against what we know present as liberalism, and what next day will be posthumanism, replacing a human individual by a bizarre conglomerate of virtual reality and sexless, animalless individuals without property. Adam, if individual full understands your capital informing through Harari's imagination (for which you have been met with so many unearned Polish online attacks) – this individual is Aleksander Dugin, coming to almost identical conclusions, only that by exploring the degeneration of doctrine alternatively than the very visible politics and ideology. So you distance yourself, dear fellow, from your most apparent ally.
The Orthodox fan game “In a Painted Chrushniak”?
It is clear that Dugin is reasoning in imperial terms, only that prof. Wielomski knows perfectly well that imperial is not the same as imperialistic. Since we are talking seriously and not under the level of Facebook grunts – we do not gotta explain specified obviousities. The Russian thought is an imperial and civilizational idea, due to the fact that besides Russianness (evolving in its time like the identity of the political nation of the Republic) – it is not ethnicity, it is simply a broader concept, as large as not curious in the further absorption of alien beings culturally.
Kol. I think Adam is just jokingly divorcing, as “Dugin would most gladly baptize us at the Orthodoxy.” Although he knows perfectly well that no one, and even the least connected with the Russian old age Alexander Gielewicz, would not even want to bother. And due to the fact that Dugin, who was powerfully asked before the PRUARY what about Polish political thought and practice he appreciated, mentioned among others Hoene-Wroński and Dr. Well, that only means that he knows and respects what is first and authentically Polish... Nota bene Aleksander Gielewicz knows and appreciates Leśmian very much, but this does not mean that he diabolically wants to attack Poland in order to replace all Mickiewicz streets with the avenues of the author of the "Shadow Drink".
How to Disgust the Polonophiles
Let us be serious. Unfortunately, I do not know how Mr Magdalena Ziętek-Welomska knows for certain and with specified categoricality that In fact, only Dugin's 1998 interview for “Frondy” contains his “real views”For example, 24 volumes of his opus magnum, “Noomachia”, Alexander Gielewicz wrote only for the play and distraction from the most crucial conversation in his life with ed. Górny. However, I realize that erstwhile 1 thing is read, it is worth being faithful in further technological career, as described by Dmowski's wife Dr. Piętek. I know this investigation attitude, and I would never dare to criticize it. On the same principle, he inactive repents that “Dugin wants to destruct Poland!’ which is, after all, a insignificant formal, but a fundamental distortion of his highly pro-Polish call, so that in our own, well understood interest we would cease to form part of Russia's chain of imperialist aggression. However, supporting the liberation of Poland has been presented to the no longer known Russian Poles as a deadly threat, and it is known erstwhile something is dangerous – it is besides not worth reading, due to the fact that why fear and stress more...
Practice of Philosophy
However, curious in a certain expansion of horizons and investigation base can most likely without fear (and without looking at the “reviews” of the unread...) after Dugin's books reach, since the first effort of Revolta Publishing House, and now Dom Wydukniczy Przemyśl Polska are published in Polish. I encourage this especially prof. Prof. Dr. hab. Wielomski, due to the fact that I know perfectly well what offends him in Dugin (without reading, but most likely after a brief look). Adam hates exaltation, rejects all clear commitment, I remember perfectly how years ago at 1 of the Convents of the Conservative-Monarchist Club he could not bear a certain prayer raised in memory by our colleagues at the time, and in which it was swarming with firing acts, devotions and self-beating stylistic figures.
Any text suspected of emotion is rejected by the publisher of Conservatives.pl, so much so Adam believes in his own distance to all the issues raised. Again, however, this is simply a misunderstanding. Dugin doesn't remember. He doesn't confuse dreams with reality. He is an ideologist – MORE practices, due to the fact that he understands perfectly well that today's doctrine utilized by Russia is this “written by rocket artillery”. Although to know why to shoot for – there must be not only a mark for rockets, but besides an ideological goal, so established by its own school of thought, its own philosophy, its own everything, another than the Russian forgeries of BigMac or the Chinese copy of Rolls-Royce. I'm sorry, is anyone in Poland even considering an alternate to liberalism? Does Adam, informing against the elimination of humanity, compose only an obituary for mankind, but does he inactive think that something can be saved? due to the fact that maybe, as he admitted recently, he truly doesn't see the point of writing and commenting on something newer than Innocent III?
Poupits
It is true, Dugin writes, repeats, says how he thinks that the Russian policy should be pursued, but does not claim that it is, nor does he be tempted to advise others how to solve their own problems. For example – again like Adam, but little blind and less... Emotionally, Aleksander Gielewicz agreed to comment on any of the actions Donald Trump. However, he never lost sight of the limitations of his presidency as well as the anachronism of the old paradigm of global realism towards the current phase of globalisation. Similarly, it is with the order of sovereign national states. Unfortunately, in today's world, too, they are treated as outages, utilized during the transitional period, on the way to the planet Government. Adam Wielomski, an enlightened nationalist, has the same consciousness as Eurasian Dugin, standing on the ground of the Russian Idea, i.e. imperial-civilization. Both defend what is natural for their peoples – Polish ethnicity and Russian ethnos. Both of us and them – we have the same enemy, posthumanism and not even cooperating we must see that the activity of Russia, China, as well as Iran and others objectively inhibits, and even tries to reverse the killing processes for Poland and Poland. Therefore, not being the same – we are at least poputchiki, companions of the road, not necessarily leading to the same goal.
Let's not be afraid to start with reading.
Konrad Hand
[1] The president Manifesto of the large Awakening and Writings of Wartime, M. Piskorski, Warsaw 2022.
